Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 322

All’s fair in love and super: why couples should equalise super

It is common for couples to have very different super balances. If one partner has taken time out to care for children, undertake casual work, or work part-time, the disparity can be pronounced. Super balances will also vary depending on the individual’s age and salary.

But changes implemented by super reforms since 1 July 2017 have brought greater incentives for spouses to consider equalising their superannuation balances, including tax and estate planning benefits.

Some of the major changes

The transfer balance cap limits the total amount of superannuation that can be transferred from the accumulation phase to the tax-free retirement phase.

This cap starts at $1.6 million per individual. Any excess transfer balance amount must be removed from the retirement phase and will be subject to tax. Equalising super between spouses can therefore maximise the amount that can be invested in the tax-free retirement phase and the amount that can be kept in the tax-friendly super environment if one spouse were to die.

In addition, from July 2018, individuals with a total super balance less than $500,000 are allowed to carry forward unused concessional contributions (ie pre-tax super contributions) and ‘catch them up’ in later years.

This rule also creates an argument for equalising super between spouses, so both can potentially use the catch-up concessional contribution measure to maximize their retirement savings.

How to equalise super between spouses

A number of strategies can be used to equalise super balances between spouses, including regular spouse contributions, contributions splitting and recontribution strategy.

If a member’s income is below $37,000, their spouse may receive a tax offset of up to $540 if they make a spouse contribution of up to $3,000 to their spouse’s super each year. If the receiving spouse’s income exceeds $37,000, the amount of the tax offset available starts phasing out and cuts out completely at $40,000.

Couples can also consider contributions splitting, which allows one member of a couple to roll over up to 85% of their concessional contributions made in a year to their spouse.

Another option for couples who have reached age 60 is a recontribution strategy. This involves withdrawing some super benefits from the account of the spouse with a higher balance, by starting a transition to retirement income stream or making a lump sum withdrawal (if a condition of release is met) and recontributing to the spouse’s super account.

These withdrawn funds can then be contributed to the spouse’s account either via a spouse contribution or a personal contribution (ie the spouse making a member contribution for themselves).

Either way, the contribution counts towards the receiving spouse’s non-concessional contribution cap, which is $100,000 per year, or if the receiving spouse is under 65, the bring-forward cap of up to $300,000 may be available.

These strategies can be a useful way for couples to maximise the amount that can be held tax-free at retirement, which is $3.2 million in total. For members in the accumulation phase with a total super balance of less than $500,000, they can also help both members of a couple qualify to make catch-up concessional contributions to maximise their super savings in the lead to retirement.

The recontribution strategy can also be useful for estate planning purposes, as it potentially reduces the tax payable from death benefit proceeds. It may boost an older spouse’s amount of age pension if the older spouse is the person with the higher balance where the younger spouse is under their qualifying age pension age and their super accumulation accounts are not assessed for social security purposes.

Other considerations

The new catch-up rule for concessional contributions will also increase the flexibility of salary sacrifice arrangements.

For example, if Anne receives $5,000 in employer superannuation contributions and does not make any additional pre-tax contributions, she will have $20,000 of unused concessional contributions left in the 2018-19 tax year. This can then be carried forward for up to five years.

For Australians who have been funneling income into other areas, like a mortgage, kids’ education, or paying off personal debt, this new rule provides a welcome way to add more to super when they can afford to.

If both partners have low super balances, for example if both are self-employed, low income earners or recent immigrants to Australia, there may be no need to split contributions. But there are still strategies available to help with maximising super.

Those with income below $38,564 may consider taking advantage of the government co-contribution of up to $500 by making an after-tax member contribution of $1,000 if eligible. The cut-off threshold is $53,564. To qualify, the member must be under 71 and have personal exertion income (such as a salary) of over 10% of their total income.

The increase in the spouse income threshold from $10,800 to $37,000 for spouse contribution tax offset purposes also provides greater incentive for partners to make super contributions on behalf of a low-income spouse. The contributing spouse can potentially claim a tax offset up to $540 per year by making super contributions on behalf of a low-income partner.

Concluding observations

Members of a couple equalising their super balances can bring tax benefits, help with estate planning and boost the retirement nest egg of a partner with minimal retirement savings.

While couples may be concerned about the impact of equalising super in the event of divorce, as super is considered a divisible asset under Australian Family Law, there should be little impact.

There are, however, other risks to consider, such as ensuring no caps are breached and that members meet the conditions required for each strategy.

Given the number of potential strategies on offer and the complexity of some of these, we recommend that anyone who is considering ways to boost their super should seek financial advice.

 

Craig Day is an Executive Manager at Colonial First State. This article is for general information only and readers should seek professional advice on their personal circumstances before taking action.

 

  •   5 September 2019
  • 3
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

When losses in super become irreplaceable

The quirks of retirement planning with an age gap

Investment bonds should be considered for retirement planning

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.