Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 322

All’s fair in love and super: why couples should equalise super

It is common for couples to have very different super balances. If one partner has taken time out to care for children, undertake casual work, or work part-time, the disparity can be pronounced. Super balances will also vary depending on the individual’s age and salary.

But changes implemented by super reforms since 1 July 2017 have brought greater incentives for spouses to consider equalising their superannuation balances, including tax and estate planning benefits.

Some of the major changes

The transfer balance cap limits the total amount of superannuation that can be transferred from the accumulation phase to the tax-free retirement phase.

This cap starts at $1.6 million per individual. Any excess transfer balance amount must be removed from the retirement phase and will be subject to tax. Equalising super between spouses can therefore maximise the amount that can be invested in the tax-free retirement phase and the amount that can be kept in the tax-friendly super environment if one spouse were to die.

In addition, from July 2018, individuals with a total super balance less than $500,000 are allowed to carry forward unused concessional contributions (ie pre-tax super contributions) and ‘catch them up’ in later years.

This rule also creates an argument for equalising super between spouses, so both can potentially use the catch-up concessional contribution measure to maximize their retirement savings.

How to equalise super between spouses

A number of strategies can be used to equalise super balances between spouses, including regular spouse contributions, contributions splitting and recontribution strategy.

If a member’s income is below $37,000, their spouse may receive a tax offset of up to $540 if they make a spouse contribution of up to $3,000 to their spouse’s super each year. If the receiving spouse’s income exceeds $37,000, the amount of the tax offset available starts phasing out and cuts out completely at $40,000.

Couples can also consider contributions splitting, which allows one member of a couple to roll over up to 85% of their concessional contributions made in a year to their spouse.

Another option for couples who have reached age 60 is a recontribution strategy. This involves withdrawing some super benefits from the account of the spouse with a higher balance, by starting a transition to retirement income stream or making a lump sum withdrawal (if a condition of release is met) and recontributing to the spouse’s super account.

These withdrawn funds can then be contributed to the spouse’s account either via a spouse contribution or a personal contribution (ie the spouse making a member contribution for themselves).

Either way, the contribution counts towards the receiving spouse’s non-concessional contribution cap, which is $100,000 per year, or if the receiving spouse is under 65, the bring-forward cap of up to $300,000 may be available.

These strategies can be a useful way for couples to maximise the amount that can be held tax-free at retirement, which is $3.2 million in total. For members in the accumulation phase with a total super balance of less than $500,000, they can also help both members of a couple qualify to make catch-up concessional contributions to maximise their super savings in the lead to retirement.

The recontribution strategy can also be useful for estate planning purposes, as it potentially reduces the tax payable from death benefit proceeds. It may boost an older spouse’s amount of age pension if the older spouse is the person with the higher balance where the younger spouse is under their qualifying age pension age and their super accumulation accounts are not assessed for social security purposes.

Other considerations

The new catch-up rule for concessional contributions will also increase the flexibility of salary sacrifice arrangements.

For example, if Anne receives $5,000 in employer superannuation contributions and does not make any additional pre-tax contributions, she will have $20,000 of unused concessional contributions left in the 2018-19 tax year. This can then be carried forward for up to five years.

For Australians who have been funneling income into other areas, like a mortgage, kids’ education, or paying off personal debt, this new rule provides a welcome way to add more to super when they can afford to.

If both partners have low super balances, for example if both are self-employed, low income earners or recent immigrants to Australia, there may be no need to split contributions. But there are still strategies available to help with maximising super.

Those with income below $38,564 may consider taking advantage of the government co-contribution of up to $500 by making an after-tax member contribution of $1,000 if eligible. The cut-off threshold is $53,564. To qualify, the member must be under 71 and have personal exertion income (such as a salary) of over 10% of their total income.

The increase in the spouse income threshold from $10,800 to $37,000 for spouse contribution tax offset purposes also provides greater incentive for partners to make super contributions on behalf of a low-income spouse. The contributing spouse can potentially claim a tax offset up to $540 per year by making super contributions on behalf of a low-income partner.

Concluding observations

Members of a couple equalising their super balances can bring tax benefits, help with estate planning and boost the retirement nest egg of a partner with minimal retirement savings.

While couples may be concerned about the impact of equalising super in the event of divorce, as super is considered a divisible asset under Australian Family Law, there should be little impact.

There are, however, other risks to consider, such as ensuring no caps are breached and that members meet the conditions required for each strategy.

Given the number of potential strategies on offer and the complexity of some of these, we recommend that anyone who is considering ways to boost their super should seek financial advice.

 

Craig Day is an Executive Manager at Colonial First State. This article is for general information only and readers should seek professional advice on their personal circumstances before taking action.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

How the super contribution changes may benefit you

Five things SMSF trustees should consider right now

Putting the ‘self’ into self managed super

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Who's next? Discounts on LICs force managers to pivot

The boards and managers of six high-profile LICs, frustrated by their shares trading at large discounts to asset value, have embarked on radical strategies to fix the problems. Will they work?

Four simple things to do right now

Markets have recovered in the last six months but most investors remain nervous about the economic outlook. Morningstar analysts provide four quick tips on how to navigate this uncertainty.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 373

It was a milestone for strange times last week when the company with the longest record in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) index, ExxonMobil, once the largest company in the world, was replaced by a software company, Salesforce. Only one company in the original DJIA exists today. As businesses are disrupted, how many of the current DJIA companies will disappear in the next decade or two?

  • 2 September 2020

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 374

Suddenly, it's the middle of September and we don't hear much about 'snap back' anymore. Now we have 'wind backs' and 'road maps'. Six months ago, I was flying back from Antarctica after two weeks aboard the ill-fated Greg Mortimer cruise ship, and then the world changed. So it's time to take your temperature again. Our survey checks your reaction to recent policies and your COVID-19 responses.

  • 9 September 2020

Reporting season winners and losers in listed property trusts

Many property trust results are better than expected, with the A-REIT sector on a dividend yield of 4.8%. But there's a wide variation by sector and the ability of tenants to pay the rent.

Every SMSF trustee should have an Enduring Power of Attorney

COVID-19 and the events of 2020 show why, more than ever, SMSF trustees need to prepare for the ‘unexpected’ by having an Enduring Power of Attorney in place. A Power of Attorney is not enough.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

Who's next? Discounts on LICs force managers to pivot

The boards and managers of six high-profile LICs, frustrated by their shares trading at large discounts to asset value, have embarked on radical strategies to fix the problems. Will they work?

Shares

Have stock markets become a giant Ponzi scheme?

A global financial casino has been created where investors ignore realistic valuations in the low growth, high-risk environment. At some point, analysis of fundamental value will be rewarded.

Gold

Interview Series: Why it’s gold’s time to shine

With gold now on the radar of individual investors, SMSFs and institutions, here's what you need to know about the choices between gold bars, gold ETFs and even gold miners, with Jordan Eliseo. 

SMSF strategies

SMSFs during COVID-19 and your 14-point checklist

SMSFs come with an administration burden underestimated by many. For example, did you know trustees need to document a member’s decision to take the reduced pension minimum under the new COVID rules?

Retirement

Funding retirement through a stock market crash

On the surface, a diversified fund looks the same as an SMSF with the same asset allocations. But to fund retirement, a member must sell units in the fund, whereas the cash balance is used in an SMSF.

Australia’s debt and interest burden: can we afford it?

Australia has an ageing population and rising welfare and health costs, but it is still the best placed among its ‘developed’ country peers. Here's why the expected levels of debt are manageable.

Weekly Editorial

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 375

There are many ways to value a company, but the most popular is to estimate the future cash flows and discount them to a present value using a chosen interest rate. Does it follow that when interest rates fall, companies become more valuable? Perhaps, but only if the cash flows remain unchanged, and in a recession, future earnings are more difficult to sustain. What do Buffett and Douglass and 150 years of data say?

  • 16 September 2020
  • 5

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.