Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 218

Retirement planning improved by grey hairs

Most planning advice regarding saving for or the enjoyment of retirement is given by people who are not retired. While the advice may be well meaning, it could inadvertently suffer from a lack of empathy with the realities of retirement.

In addition, the experience and expectations of current and previous retirees may differ significantly from that of the vast numbers of baby boomers that will increasingly dominate the ranks of the retirees over the next decade. As a result, retirement advice based on researching earlier generations may not be as relevant as expected.

A recent article in The New York Times, titled "Three Things I Should Have Said About Retirement Planning" is a confession. Paul B. Brown co-authored two books on saving for retirement while he was in his 30s and 40s. He is now aged over 60 and his typical advice suffered some inadequacies, now made apparent by his own life experience.

Retirement planning meets reality

He provides three examples where his generic approach to retirement planning failed to accord with the reality he experienced.

1. Working longer

The first example concerns a typical response to inadequate retirement savings. Rather than the suggestion to a client that they need to save more and spend less, the more palatable advice is often to suggest they work longer. Together with the fact that we are usually living longer, working longer doesn’t appear an unreasonable proposition.

The obvious argument against this for those in labour-intensive jobs is they may be physically incapable of working longer. But Brown’s experience is consistent with that of a number of our clients:

“… I now realize … just how hard it is to keep working as you age. My job doesn’t require much more than typing all day long, and I find myself getting fairly tired by day’s end. I can’t imagine I am going to have more energy a decade from now.”

So, unless you remain extremely passionate about your work, working longer to rectify an inadequate savings problem isn’t necessarily the easy option it is often held out to be. If our clients are to work beyond a desired retirement age, we prefer it to be by choice, rather than driven by financial necessity.

2. Life is not predictable

Brown’s second example concerns an assumption that ‘life moves in straight lines’, for example, once you begin saving, you keep saving. His earlier advice assumed that when children moved out of home and were financially self-sufficient, the money previously directed to children would then all be available for retirement savings.

His reality was that for some considerable time those ‘available’ funds went to home repair that had been deferred during the high cost years of raising and educating children. His retirement planning advice had not allowed for the significant and ongoing cost of what we call ‘capital maintenance’.

In our view, Brown’s previous retirement planning advice failed to sufficiently drill down into the financial expectations of his clients (or book purchasers). We ask our pre-retiree clients, regardless of their current age, to not only tell us how much they are spending now but also what they would like to spend in retirement. We go through a list of likely household expenditures line by line and over time, on the understanding that the pattern of spending may change.

For example, more money may be devoted to travel, sports and entertainment in the early years of retirement. Spending may reduce in later years as mobility and, perhaps, enthusiasm for such activities decreases, but expenditure on medical costs and support for children/grandchildren may rise.

One area of spending that receives special focus is what we call capital maintenance. This usually refers to the cost of updating the family residence and replacing motor vehicles. These generally imply lumpy, irregular outflows that are often overlooked when determining expected ongoing expenditure.

No client has ever told us that they want to run their existing motor vehicles into the ground or let their house fall down around their ears in retirement. The general expectation is that these capital items will be refurbished or replaced so that their pre-retirement standard is at least maintained.

3. Incurrence of large, one-off expenses

This is supported by the third example, where Brown’s personal experience included a large one-off expense for a combined major trip and wedding that had not been contemplated and seriously affected the family’s financial position. It underlines the need to budget for future desired ongoing holidays and other major, highly likely, expenses (e.g. weddings, support for adult children), so that should a large unplanned once-off expense occur it does not cause an entire financial plan to unravel.

‘Rules of thumb’ solutions may not be helpful

Brown’s solution to the conflict between his earlier advice and actual experience leads him to recommend: “And no matter how much money you think you are going to need, save another 15%, just in case”.

We believe this advice will fail to handle reality adequately. There is no substitute for:

  • A detailed examination of the financial implications of lifestyle expectations, and
  • A regular review (at least annually) of the resulting lifelong cash flows, given changes will inevitably occur.

The actual experience of a wealthy accountant, who sought a second opinion from us regarding the veracity of his financial planning, is salutary. He planned to retire within two years and, among other things, estimated a desired retirement lifestyle of $120,000 per annum.

A more thorough analysis of his expected spending and incorporation of overlooked allowances for capital maintenance (of a principal residence, holiday house, investment property and two luxury cars) suggested that $200,000 per annum was more realistic. An additional 67% retirement capital required a dramatic change in lifestyle expectations. In the case of this client, adding another 15% would have been wholly inadequate.

The future is unpredictable and an opinion on a desired future lifestyle many years ahead may change by the time the date arrives. But not making some reasonable guesses makes it almost certain that unplanned adjustments, most likely significant, will be needed at some stage.


John Leske is a Principal of Wealth Foundations. This article is general advice only as it does not take into account the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular person.


Leave a Comment:



10 strategies for retiring retirement: life, liberty and happiness

Making judgments based on age


Most viewed in recent weeks

Lessons when a fund manager of the year is down 25%

Every successful fund manager suffers periods of underperformance, and investors who jump from fund to fund chasing results are likely to do badly. Selecting a manager is a long-term decision but what else?

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

In almost 1,000 responses, our readers differ in voting intentions versus polling of the general population, but they have little doubt who will win and there is widespread disappointment with our politics.

Now you can earn 5% on bonds but stay with quality

Conservative investors who want the greater capital security of bonds can now lock in 5% but they should stay at the higher end of credit quality. Rises in rates and defaults mean it's not as easy as it looks.

30 ETFs in one ecosystem but is there a favourite?

In the last decade, ETFs have become a mainstay of many portfolios, with broad market access to most asset types, as well as a wide array of sectors and themes. Is there a favourite of a CEO who oversees 30 funds?

Betting markets as election predictors

Believe it or not, betting agencies are in the business of making money, not predicting outcomes. Is there anything we can learn from the current odds on the election results?

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Latest Updates


'It’s your money' schemes transfer super from young to old

With the Coalition losing the 2022 election, its policy to allow young people to access super goes back on the shelf. But lowering the downsizer age to 55 was supported by Labor. Check the merits of both policies.

Investment strategies

Rising recession risk and what it means for your portfolio

In this environment, safe-haven assets like Government bonds act as a diversifier given the uncorrelated nature to equities during periods of risk-off, while offering a yield above term deposit rates.

Investment strategies

‘Multidiscipline’: the secret of Bezos' and Buffett’s wild success

A key attribute of great investors is the ability to abstract away the specifics of a particular domain, leaving only the important underlying principles upon which great investments can be made.


Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.


Confession season is upon us: What’s next for equity markets

Companies tend to pre-position weak results ahead of 30 June, leading to earnings downgrades. The next two months will be critical for investors as a shift from ‘great expectations’ to ‘clear explanations’ gets underway.


Australia, the Lucky Country again?

We may have been extremely unlucky with the unforgiving weather plaguing the East Coast of Australia this year. However, on the economic front we are by many measures in a strong position relative to the rest of the world.

Exchange traded products

LIC discounts widening with the market sell-off

Discounts on LICs and LITs vary with market conditions, and many prominent managers have seen the value of their assets fall as well as discount widen. There may be opportunities for gains if discounts narrow.



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.