Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 234

Summer Series, Guest Editor, Noel Whittaker

At a time when we are overwhelmed with information, getting back to basics is crucial. This desire to focus on the fundamentals has guided the selection of my favourite Cuffelinks articles, mainly from 2017.

Whenever I give a seminar, many of the questions are from people who want to know where the stock market is going, where interest rates are going, where commodity prices are going and where they should invest next. My reply is always that if they focus on things they can control, they won't need to be unduly worried about things they can't.

This is why the article on Howard Marks is so important. It goes right back to basic principles, explains the dangers of forecasting, and how many of them are wrong.

This leads naturally to the next article by Don Stammer. Just before the 2016 presidential elections, I received many emails and calls from people telling me proudly they had cashed in their portfolio "in case Trump got elected". And we know what a bad decision that turned out to be.

In my 20 Commandments of Wealth for Retirees (also available as a PDF by free download from my website) I point out that one of the worst enemies of the investor is the media – it only focuses on bad and pessimistic news.

The Labor attack on family trusts showed a deplorable lack of knowledge about how they work. It also had the potential to scare people away from what has long been one of the most attractive and effective entities for minimising tax legally, and protecting assets. Therefore, Sam Wylie’s article was timely inasmuch as it explained in a simple way how trusts work and the benefits they could bring to investors.

As I have said many times, the main enemy of an investor is not the markets or taxation, it is simply ignorance. Having reached the ripe old age of 78, my focus has moved from acquiring assets for myself to spending my money in a way that enables me to leave a legacy. And all the research shows that giving money to worthy causes produces enormous personal happiness and satisfaction.

After I read the article by Antonia Ruffell, I phoned Chris Cuffe for advice on what my next step should be. This led me to a meeting with Antonia, and subsequently to starting my own endowment fund. I am delighted with the process.

We are now 30 years from the 1987 crash. For many of us old grey hairs it is still memorable, but most Australians who have reached investing age know nothing about it. Ashley Owen has been a friend of mine for many years, and is one of the most knowledgeable people about markets I have ever met. This article is an outstanding contribution to the pool of knowledge that any successful investor needs to have.

Noel Whittaker, Guest Editor

Noel Whittaker is one of Australia's foremost authorities on personal finance and a best-selling author of many books including Making Money Made Simple. See www.noelwhittaker.com.au.

8 Comments
William
January 18, 2018

Trusts and Negative Gearing are minor when compared to the spectacular gains made by those who own and/or speculate in land, especially land with a high locational value.
These gains are largely untaxed and contribute to the transfer of unearned wealth to those lucky enough to own land in these locations. The next major collapse (a la 2008) will occur when there is excessive credit fuelled speculation in land - aided and abetted by the banks and other lenders.
Interested - For more information try googling Fred Harrison and Phillip J Anderson.

James
January 16, 2018

People are just using a structure that is there, to legally minimise their tax. Human nature. Whether the structure is appropriate for use as described is a different matter, and up to governments to determine.

A bit like negative gearing. Can be good for those that elect to use it. Probably disadvantages those that don't, as less tax paid by some yet the amount required to run the country the same. Net winners and net losers.

I believe a lot of politicians use family trusts and/or negative gearing!!!

Neil
January 15, 2018

Noel, I'm left a little confused after re-reading Sam Wylie's article on how trusts work.
Not by the maths mind you, but by the appropriateness of such legal structures.
Are you really suggesting that allowing very wealthy people to achieve an effective tax rate of 13.5% (as in the example given) is a good thing for our society? If so, that's a pretty big nod to neoliberal ideology and as a regular reader of your columns it does surprise me a bit.

I understand that trusts may have their place in protecting business assets (farms are often given as an example), and in succession planning, but Sam's article didn't touch on these benefits.

Alex
January 11, 2018

Noel, Sam Wylie’s article is fine as far as it goes (i.e. how trusts work), but it doesn’t address why they are allowed. I suggest this be the focus of another article. I expect it will be a very short article, explaining the appropriateness of a trust when an adult beneficiary is incapacitated from decision-making or where children are wards of the state, but otherwise observing the inappropriateness of such structures.

Best wishes, Alex

Fred Randall
January 11, 2018

So people are offended by the truth now. What princesses we've become.

Stan
January 17, 2018

Your agreement with Noel Whittaker's opinion does not make it a "truth".It is possible that rather than Labor having a "deplorable lack of knowledge of how trusts work", they fully understand them and that is precisely why they want to remove them.

Geoffrey
January 11, 2018

The email you sent out where Noel Whittaker is the guest editor contains the following sentence,
"The Labor attack on family trusts showed a deplorable lack of knowledge about how they work."
I am interested in hearing yours and his opinions on investing, not on politics. Perhaps a more neutral tone might be better in the future.

John Bannister
January 10, 2018

On the family trusts article, costs of set up and operation must be taken into account.
Compliance costs on a company and trust structure will be at least $5,000 pa.

Also there is no reference to the Centrelink Controlled Private Trust or Income Tax Division 7A rules.

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Planning

Will young Australians be better off than their parents?

For much of Australia’s history, each new generation has been better off than the last: better jobs and incomes as well as improved living standards. A new report assesses whether this time may be different.

Superannuation

The rubbery numbers behind super tax concessions

In selling the super tax, Labor has repeated Treasury claims of there being $50 billion in super tax concessions annually, mostly flowing to high-income earners. This figure is vastly overstated.

Investment strategies

A steady road to getting rich

The latest lists of Australia’s wealthiest individuals show that while overall wealth has continued to rise, gains by individuals haven't been uniform. Many might have been better off adopting a simpler investment strategy.

Economy

Would a corporate tax cut boost productivity in Australia?

As inflation eases, the Albanese government is switching its focus to lifting Australia’s sluggish productivity. Can corporate tax cuts reboot growth - or are we chasing a theory that doesn’t quite work here?

Are V-shaped market recoveries becoming more frequent?

April’s sharp rebound may feel familiar, but are V-shaped recoveries really more common in the post-COVID world? A look at market history suggests otherwise and hints that a common bias might be skewing perceptions.

Investment strategies

Asset allocation in a world of riskier developed markets

Old distinctions between developed and emerging market bonds no longer hold true. At a time where true diversification matters more than ever, this has big ramifications for the way that portfolios should be constructed.

Investment strategies

Top 5 investment reads

As the July school holiday break nears, here are some investment classics to put onto your reading list. The books offer lessons in investment strategy, financial disasters, and mergers and acquisitions.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.