Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 298

Cuffelinks Firstlinks Edition 298

  •   22 March 2019
  •      
  •   

The Reserve Bank has not moved the cash rate since 3 August 2016, which suggests its website might be struggling for a bit of action. But the cash rate is not the only policy tool in its kit bag, as it can opine on almost anything. In recent weeks, two issues have caught widespread attention. 

In the first, a Reserve Bank paper on Australian housing fessed up that:

"We find that low interest rates (partly reflecting lower world rates) explain much of the rapid growth in housing prices and construction over the past few years. Another demand factor, high immigration, helps explain the tight housing market and rapid growth in rents in the late 2000s."

It's almost an admission that the reductions in the cash rate, twice in 2015 and twice in 2016, were steps too far. The FOMO pushed up residential property prices until the mid-2017 peak, which is now inflicting pain as recent buyers fall into negative equity or struggle to settle amid falling prices. There's also less cash rate firepower to stimulate the economy as it slows.

The timing on the second paper, this one on climate change, appears spot on, catching a mood perfectly. It feels like a tipping point when politicians such as Tony Abbott (who reversed his call for Australia to leave the Paris Accord) and Peter Dutton (who refused to support the government building a coal-fired power station) change their tune just before an election, realising that most voters have accepted the dominant science. One of the Reserve Bank charts shows wind and solar are finally competitive sources of electricity, promising a strong future for solar when combined with storage capacity. It's a good story in this land of sunshine.    

 

 
The latest Essential Vision poll shows the majority of Coalition voters and those over 55 believe climate change is caused by human activity, with young people leading the way in their views.  
 


For investors, including those who reject the climate change science, it's time to recognise the impact on portfolios. On the weekend, the AFR reported the first chair in 2008 of the UK Climate Change Committee, Lord Adair Turner, now saying:

"It's so embarrassing. I mean, we knew the price of wind and solar was coming down but we thought it might come down at, you know, 20% a decade or something like that. Solar has come down by 90% or so, wind has come down by 70%."  

Two articles this week look at ESG investing. Use the Have Your Say section for comments.

Moving on from the franking credit debate, we look at Labor policies on negative gearing and capital gains. Noel Whittaker reports on a housing policy roundtable he attended, and he is especially concerned about the price impact when a 'new' property becomes 'established'. However, Richard Holden argues negative gearing creates intergenerational inequality and financial instability. The debate highlights how investors should watch the interlink between policies, as switching to assets without franking might generate more capital gains which might be taxed at a higher rate than in the past.

On investing, Oscar Oberg sees better growth prospects in offshore markets as Australia slows, and Ilan Israelstan reports on ETF research showing changes in investor and asset composition. Pablo Berrutti and Mark Nieuwoudt explain new moves in ESG principles. 

The big news in asset management this week was Brookfield taking a majority stake in Howard Marks' Oakfield Capital, so it's instructive that Jonathan Rochford reviews the latest Marks book on market cycles. Did Marks pick the top of the value cycle for his firm?

I met with Nobel Laureate, Robert Merton, a few years ago, and he espoused the merits of reverse mortgages as part of the retirement income solution. Most Australian banks have exited the product, and Joshua Funder makes the case for a revival of home equity access. 

We recently ran a 'face off' on the use of government bonds in all portfolios, and Warren Bird has a short reply as a referee after judging both cases.

This week's White Paper from Vanguard examines How Australia Saves. It includes great insights into super defaults among millions of Australians. Plus we have the monthly report from BetaShares on ETF trends after a record month for growth. Also, many new LICs are coming this year, especially with an income focus, although the Bell Potter report below suggests their total returns have lagged the broad market in 2019 due to discounts to NTA widening. 


Graham Hand, Managing Editor

For a PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles, click here.

 

  •   22 March 2019
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.