Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 262

Cuffelinks Newsletter Edition 262

  •   13 July 2018
  •      
  •   

There are many theories about why most active fund managers fail to consistently outperform their benchmarks. It takes many years of study and market experience to become a portfolio manager, but good results are often elusive. One theory is that there are so many skillful managers pricing shares that the market is relatively efficient and tough to beat.

Research by Hendrik Bessembinder of Arizona State University shows active management and stock selection is really difficult. He found that most stocks listed in the US since 1926 delivered lifetime negative returns relative to one-month US Treasury bills. Only 4% of companies (represented by the blue box below), or about 1,000 out of a total data base of over 25,000, produced half the returns of the entire market.




The grey space of the outer box represents the vast majority of companies that generated no returns, with 12% delisting at an average of 2.5% of their listing price. It's more common to invest in losers than winners, especially when competing against other talented analysts.

It's even more difficult to value a loss-making startup that has a good idea gaining traction. We take a close look at Raiz Invest, the former Acorns Australia, both as a micro investing platform and a company recently listed on the ASX. What's it worth? Take a guess.

Banks compete aggressively in many products, such as housing loans, but bank retail FX rates have always been pathetic. As I write this, the wholesale AUD/USD is 0.7419 and the retail rate from a major bank is 0.71. So A$100 buys US$71 at a branch instead of US$74, a difference of over 4% and a costly start to a holiday. Matthew Hayja uncovers the choices for a better deal.

The $1.6 million pension cap opens a number of financial planning choices, and Graeme Colleyand Emma Partenza explain how to contribute for a spouse with lower balances. Julie Steedalso shows how disability insurance works, something we all hope we don't need but might.

Longevity? 120 years is just the start

Few retirees know how long their money needs to last, and the doubt causes many to live frugally. Adam Curtis examines the dilemma that sequencing and longevity risks create. 
   
In the King James Bible, 2 Kings 25:27, the King of Babylon releases the King of Judah ...

"And set his throne above the throne of the kings that were with him in Babylon;
And changed his prison garments:
And he did eat bread continually before him all the days of his life.
And his allowance was a continual allowance given him of the king, a daily rate for every day, all the days of his life."


Average life expectancy in biblical times was less than 40 years, so the cost of this promise was probably not great. But in a presentation last year, Hamish Douglass of Magellan said that medical advances would allow people to live to 500. What about 1,000 years? While scientists do not unanimously support the claims of Ori Eyal, it's thought-provoking for how long retirement may last some time in the future.

Also looking into the future, the White Paper from MFS Investment Management is 'Dawn of the Urban Epoch', with the consequences for investing in an increasingly urbanised world.

ASIC on property spruikers for SMSFs

ASIC is watching SMSF service providers closely. The regulator recently found 90% of advice given to SMSFs was non-compliant and 30% risked disadvantaging the client. There was also a focus on 'one-stop shops' for the purchase of geared property through SMSFs, with groups of agents, lenders, brokers, developers and financial advisers all working together, even when a property was not suitable. So we reprise my article published in 2013 where I attended one of these spruiking seminars, when I was shocked by what happened. It's taken five years to 'crack down'.

A reminder that some new super regulations came in last week, including topping up unused $25,000 concessional limits over the following five years for super balances less than $500,000, and the new downsizing rules for people over 65 to make a non-concessional contribution.

Mark your diaries for 6 August 2018. The Financial Services Royal Commission has asked 30 superannuation funds to make a director available to give evidence. More sweaty palms.

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

 

Edition 262 | 13 Jul 2018 | Editorial | Newsletter

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Superannuation

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

Have Apple and Google reached the beginning of the end?

It might be hard to imagine a world where Apple and Google aren’t dominant, but disruption often starts with tiny cracks. AI's emergence into the mainstream might have set the stage for a new generation of leaders.

Superannuation

Did retirees lose out when they accepted defined benefit schemes?

Defined benefit pensions were designed to offer security in retirement. But new tax policies and arbitrary limits now erode their value - especially for Australians who contributed their own savings to these plans.

Property

Why Australia's agricultural land boom has stalled

Farmland prices have flatlined, bringing one of the most dramatic rural property cycles in Australian history to an end. The market for agricultural land now seems to be entering a new and more nuanced phase.

Property

The retail property niche offering income and growth

Neighbourhood shopping centres have fought off one perceived threat after another. What's more, they continue to offer secure income from blue-chip firms and other tenants linked mostly to essential spending.

ASX plans to attract more IPOs don’t go far enough

High-profile Australian stock market listings, like Guzman Y Gomez's IPO in 2024, are rare. ASIC aims to streamline the IPO process to boost listings, but faces barriers like share structures and governance.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.