Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 579

Avoiding destructive M&A and hype cycles in mining

This article is an edited transcript of Justin Halliwell’s segment in Schroders’ recent broadcast “What happens when concentration cracks?”


We talk a lot about the asymmetric risk associated with M&A [mergers and acquisitions] with all companies. We have seen a lot of value destruction from M&A over time and miners have been very much at the forefront of that issue. BHP’s failed bid for Anglo American feels like they escaped, like they were saved from themselves.

The miners have extremely privileged assets. They generate amazing cash flow and really their key job is to allocate that efficiently. We really felt with the Anglo bid that was not the case, and I can put a few numbers around that.

It was a complicated transaction with Anglo owning a lot of assets which everyone will have slightly differing views on regarding value, but really all BHP wanted was the copper. And our numbers showed they were paying about $30 billion for the copper assets, which is about $50,000 a ton of copper production.

That's around triple the typical greenfield cost of late. And in fact, one of Anglo’s copper assets they would have been acquiring was a greenfield just completed. So for a brand-new asset, they were going to pay triple what was paid for the building of that asset.

The important part there is that, I mean, that's probably a good asset. It's probably going to generate 15%, 20% returns on that recent capital investment. For BHP to make that kind of return, which is what they're looking for on the acquisition, we're looking for implicit returns north of 50% on that asset. That's just not feasible.

Even if the asset is good enough and copper prices are high enough, we'd expect governments to want to take more and more of that profitability. So, we just think it's a one-way risk in terms of that transaction. Now, like I said, they were saved from themselves. They've gone into a smaller asset in copper with less scope to destroy value.

On the flip side, they're also selling assets. So, they've been getting rid of what they consider poorer-quality assets, such as in the coal space where there are less buyers. And you can see the Whitehaven transaction, you kind of feel like Whitehaven has done well out of that one. So, BHP should just stick to their knitting, generate cashflow and allocate it more efficiently.

Future facing metals still small fry in Australia

Copper is important for electrification and decarbonisation, and lithium obviously gets a big play in that as well. BHP are very bullish on copper, there's no question, and that was a big driver behind the Anglo transaction. But the numbers are small still - even within copper, which is obviously a far more developed commodity than something like lithium.

If you look at Australia specifically, the numbers in 2023 in terms of export value were something like $90 billion of iron ore, $60 billion of coal and $5 billion of copper. And lithium, with an incredibly strong price, was about $10 billion.

So $15 billion for the future facing materials, which is what the companies like to call them, versus $150 billion for the dull and boring iron ore and coal. So, we're a long way from those green and future facing commodities, certainly in Australia, from overtaking the more mature commodities.

Now it's probably worth reflecting on something like lithium, and it really comes to how we look at commodities and how volatile commodities have become. There's a lot of money washing around the system, trying to find a home in commodities. What we're trying to do, like with lithium, is avoid the storytelling that comes with some of these commodities.

So, this is a chart from UBS. It's not to pick on them. But what we can see here is the bars on the chart are the forecast of the market surplus or deficit.


Editor’s note: the forecast from 18 months previous is shown in the dark bars and predicts a significant deficit. The lighter bars show the surplus that is now being forecast by the same broker for the same periods in the future.

It's been a huge turnaround. The lithium price has gone from a peak of $8,000 a ton 18 months ago to now sitting at $700 a ton. I mean it's a huge, huge fall. Like nothing that we've ever seen in commodity land. And as that's happened, the market and the consultants have started to change their forecast dramatically.

It's also a commodity acting like all commodities do when there's high prices. Guess what?  Supply comes in that no one dreamt of. 18 months ago, it was a race for forecasting electric vehicle penetrations. As the prices of those vehicles have risen, in part due to the commodity inflation, consumers have become more focused on the price of those cars, demand started to fall a bit and at the same time, supplies come in.

What we're trying to do is we're trying to look through those cycles. We try not to get caught up in the hubris when things are very bullish, but also, we're not trying to get too bearish at the bottom.  The flip of that would be something like alumina, where 12 or 18 months ago, everyone was super bearish and the price was maybe $300 a ton. Few people were making money and guess what? Supply starts to get shut down, demand stays robust and the price flips around.

So, that's what we're trying to do. We're trying to look through cycles, trying to not get too caught up in the ups and downs and try and keep a steadier view.

 

Justin Halliwell is Head of Research for Australian Equities at Schroders, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This extract was taken from a recent Schroders webinar titled “What Happens When Concentration Cracks?”. You can view the full webinar and selected highlights from it here.

For more articles and papers from Schroders, click here.

 

  •   25 September 2024
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Australia’s bounty: is it just diversified luck?

Why ASX miners will handily beat banks in the long-term

Banks, BHP, RIO, CSL and the tyranny of size

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

Why super returns may be heading lower

Five mega trends point to risks of a more inflation prone and lower growth environment. This, along with rich market valuations, should constrain medium term superannuation returns to around 5% per annum.

The hidden property empire of Australia’s politicians

With rising home prices and falling affordability, political leaders preach reform. But asset disclosures show many are heavily invested in property - raising doubts about whose interests housing policy really protects.

Preparing for aged care

Whether for yourself or a family member, it’s never too early to start thinking about aged care. This looks at the best ways to plan ahead, as well as the changes coming to aged care from November 1 this year.

Our experts on Jim Chalmers' super tax backdown

Labor has caved to pressure on key parts of the Division 296 tax, though also added some important nuances. Here are six experts’ views on the changes and what they mean for you.        

Latest Updates

A speech from the Prime Minister on fixing housing

“Fellow Australians, I want to address our most pressing national issue: housing. For too long, governments have tiptoed around problems from escalating prices, but for the sake of our younger generations, that stops today.”        

Taxation

Family trusts: Are they still worth it?

Family trusts remain a core structure for wealth management, but rising ATO scrutiny and complex compliance raise questions about their ongoing value. Are the benefits still worth the administrative burden?

Exchange traded products

Multiple ways to win

Both active and passive investing can work, but active investment doesn’t in the way it is practised by many fund managers and passive investing doesn’t work in the way most end investors practise it. Here’s a better way.

Economy

The Future Fund may become a 'bad bank' for problem home loans

The Future Fund says it will not be paying defined benefit pensions until at least 2033 - raising as many questions as answers. This points to an increasingly uncertain future for Australia's sovereign wealth fund.

Investment strategies

Managed accounts and the future of portfolio construction

With $233 billion under management, managed accounts are evolving into diversified, transparent, and liquid investment frameworks. The rise of ETFs and private markets marks a shift in portfolio design and discipline. 

Property

Commercial property prospects are looking up

Commercial property is seeing the same supply issues as the residential market. Given the chronic undersupply and a recent pickup in demand, it bodes well for an upturn in commercial real estate prices.

Infrastructure

Private toll roads need a shake-up

Privatised toll roads in Australia help governments avoid upfront costs but often push financial risks onto taxpayers while creating monopolies and unfair toll burdens for commuters and businesses.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.