Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 376

How the age pension helps retirees cope with losses

The immense value of the age pension is often underappreciated when markets are strong, but its worth is never greater than in a crisis.

The government age pension can potentially offset a one-third decline in the value of a wealthy retired couple's investment portfolio, according to our analysis. This revelation will provide some much-needed comfort to investors as the COVID-19 pandemic creates widespread job losses and wipes billions of dollars from retirement balances.

How the age pension makes a difference: a practical example

Theo and Sue are a hypothetical 65-year-old couple who own their home and have $1 million in pension assets.

Their comfortable position means they initially aren’t eligible for the age pension. However, they may well become eligible in future as they draw income from their investments. This can provide them with enormous additional value.

Milliman has modelled thousands of future scenarios for the couple, which demonstrates that the potential future age pension payments they might receive over the next 25 years have a median value of about $180,000 over the course of their retirement.

If Theo and Sue’s assets fall by 30% in a major shock to the market, the value of the age pension increases even more. This is because they are more likely to receive larger age pension payments, as well as benefiting from receiving them earlier into their retirement.

In fact, the median value of their age pension more than doubles, rising to approximately $500,000, essentially offsetting the entire fall in their retirement savings.

(The current level of a full age pension is $37,000 a year or $1,423 a fortnight including supplements for a couple).

What it means for different people

Wealthier retirees often receive the largest financial buffer from the age pension as their private savings decrease, even where they consider themselves to be self-funded retirees.

That’s because retirees with lower retirement savings already receive a full age pension. Those people, most of whom don’t receive financial advice, benefit far less as there is no more age pension to receive either now or in the future.

This is demonstrated in the following graph, which shows how the median value of future age pension amounts (the black line) can combine with the value of their private superannuation savings (blue line) to protect the value of their total retirement income (orange line) as retirement savings fall.

As eligibility for the full age pension becomes more likely at around a $400,000 pension balance, the value of future age pension payments levels off, leaving these individuals' retirement incomes more exposed to further market falls.

Source: Milliman analysis

Register here to receive the Firstlinks weekly newsletter for free

Financial advice in turbulent times

The emotional impact on retirees of seeing huge falls in the value of their retirement savings needs to be appreciated, along with the behavioural biases that come to the fore at times like these. The pain felt by many retirees has been proven to be much greater than that experienced by younger people.

In the current environment of falling investment values, understanding the role of the age pension as part of their retirement plan can provide welcome reassurance.

These complexities underline the value of ongoing advice and analysis to assist retirees in navigating turbulent and volatile environments. Advisers can help retirees better manage this issue in the current climate, by implementing portfolios that provide explicit protection against current and future market falls.

Key assumptions and methodology

Analysis is modelled using the Milliman GBA Platform to model 1,000 random future scenarios. Analysis assumes a couple, both aged 65-years-old who own their own home. The couple’s assets are all invested in a 70/30 Growth/Defensive asset mix within an account-based pension, with no further sources of income or assets (for age pension means-test purposes).

The couple draw down the usual minimum required income each year from their pension account (not the temporary COVID levels). All income (including age pension) is assumed to be spent, with no reinvestment of future income.

Future age pension payments are valued by means testing to determine payment amounts in each modelled scenario, then discounting those payments to today’s dollars using modelled wage inflation in each scenario. Future age pension amounts assume payment rates and thresholds (indexed in line with AWOTE) as at 20 March 2020 with deeming rates based on the announced deeming rates effective from 1 May 2020.

The analysis runs 1,000 stochastic simulations through to age 90 (i.e. over 25 years), assuming both of the couple survive to this time.

Economic models use Milliman’s standard Australian Stochastic ESG calibration and setup as at 31 December 2019. This setup is intended to be used to model the long-term dynamics of a wide range of economic variables, including asset returns, income, inflation and interest rates, and is updated quarterly as part of Milliman’s GBA Platform modelling services.


Wade Matterson is a Principal, Senior Consultant, and leader of Milliman’s Australian Financial Risk Management practice and a fellow of the Institute of Actuaries of Australia. This article is general advice only as it does not take into account the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular person.


Andrew Long
October 02, 2020

This is a fantastic article! Is there a link to white paper at all by any chance that delves into this analysis further?

Janis Flynn
October 01, 2020

Doesn't this show that it would be better to make superannuation voluntary and give workers their 9.5% now, save the Govt $43B a yr now in tax breaks for the high income contributor to Super and increase the age pension which has been shown does not get affected in times of financial downturn. We don't need to be told when, how, and how much to save. Go back to Simon Crean speech in 1981 when he said "the early stage of union involvement in Superannuation issues is that control over funds will provide unions and govt with financial leverage which can be used to advance the cause of Socialism in Australia" 

September 25, 2020

I still can't see how the government justified giving jobseekers more fortnightly income than people who worked for 50 years paying the government taxes.

September 27, 2020

Maybe the government realised that the sudden huge increase in unemployment would lead to massive social unrest and likely reduce their chances of staying in power. Also, consider the ramifications across the whole economy. We would likely be in a depression, not just a recession. The Newstart payment was/ is barely enough to live on. People receiving it still rely on charity to survive. The poorest people spend all their income. The government needed to keep money flowing around the economy and keep businesses going and people employed. I actually think that this was one of their better decisions. Imagine how much worse things could be.

September 24, 2020

Retirees who get the age pension should be the least affected by the current situation. Their age pension payments have likely gone up, they've got two extra payments of $750 per person (so $3,000 for a couple), their expenses have likely gone down, and the value of their investments assuming a 50/50 split between broadly diversified growth and defensive investments has fallen by maybe 5-7% or so from a year ago. There are a lot of people who are working who would love to be in that position!

October 01, 2020

"There are a lot of people who are working who would love to be in that position!" Really? Swap  youth and opportunity for a pitiful income ? Those "beneficiaries" are old and reduced to living on "the pension" having worked and paid taxes almost all their lives ! There were no "hand-outs" for them during the polio and flu epidemics so they could "shelter at home" in style! It's amazing to me how people can justify this governmental-largesse to support a lifestyle that is profligate and "unsustainable" at the very least ! Can't even be bothered to accept a job fruit-picking when it is urgently needed. There seems to be no end to the "feeling of entitlement" evident in your envious remarks. 


Leave a Comment:



Retiree spending patterns differ from most expectations

Four reasons many Australians will work until they're dead

How to give retirees the confidence to spend


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.