Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 317

Beat the market: active ETFs v LICs v unlisted managed funds

Today, investors have a dizzying array of choice when it comes to accessing hands-on professional investment management. They can invest in:

  • Units in an unlisted actively managed fund – a structure where investors pool their capital with other investors. The combined capital is invested by a fund manager on their behalf into assets like shares or bonds.
  • Units in an exchanged-traded managed fund (or active ETF) – similar to an unlisted investment trust except that investors can buy and sell units in the trust via an exchange; or
  • Shares in a listed investment company (LIC) – a structure which allows investors to buy shares in a listed company whose business it is to invest in a range of companies (and other assets).

Never has it been so easy for everyday investors to access a range of asset classes. We’re not quite at Uber Eats-level convenience, but it’s a step in the right direction.

To the untrained eye, these structures offer different but equally beneficial ways to access an actively-managed investment portfolio. And there are many similarities, particularly around investment objective, style and management teams. But there are subtle differences in the ways each structure allows portfolio managers to manage your money and distribute income. There are also concerns around the way in which these structures are priced and traded.

How the three structures operate

Next time you’re presented with these three options – the ABC Global Equities Fund, the ABC Global Equities Exchange Traded Managed Fund or the ABC Global Equities Listed Investment Company – you should know what to look for.

How actively managed fund structures compare

Access for retail investors

Unlisted managed funds

For a retail investor without a financial adviser or access to an investment platform, buying units in an unlisted managed fund has historically been difficult. Download a paper application form, print it, fill it in, sign it and send it via snail mail. The forms are a headache. The Bennelong Funds Management application form, for instance, is 27 pages long and this is not unique to them.

The ASX’s mFund service now makes it easier for individuals to buy and sell unlisted managed funds through their broker. However, not all funds and brokers have signed up.

Active ETFs and LICs

As both structures are listed on the ASX, investors can access them as they would a normal share.

Portfolio disclosure

Unlisted managed funds and LICs

Australian unlisted managed funds are not required to disclose their portfolio holdings, and often only list their top 10 investments. Australia is now the only market (out of the 25 assessed) that does not have portfolio holdings disclosure requirements, according to the Morningstar Global Fund Investor Experience report.

Most LICs publish their top 20-25 holdings each month.

Active ETFs

Active ETFs, on the other hand, are required to disclose their full portfolio holdings, comprising the names and weights of the investments, on a quarterly basis. Product providers typically disclose their full positions to internal market makers so they can price the underlying securities. A market maker is a dealer in securities or other assets who undertakes to buy or sell at specified prices at all times.

Pricing and trading

Unlisted managed fund

When you invest in a fund, you’re buying units in that fund. The unit price is calculated by dividing the fund’s total assets minus the value of any liabilities – known as the net asset value (NAV) – by the number of units on issue at the end of each business day.

LICs

The pricing of LICs can be more confusing because of the way they’re structured and sold. Investors buy shares in a listed company whose business it is to invest in a range of companies (and other assets). The asset value of the LIC moves in line with its underlying investments. Under ASX listing rules, LICs have 14 calendar days after the end of each month to disclose their net tangible asset (NTA) backing – the measure for what a LIC’s portfolio is worth – although some voluntarily provide weekly or daily pricing online.

However, as LICs operate in a closed-end structure (more on that later), they don’t necessarily trade at the NTA value. Often, LICs trade at a substantial premium or discount. This is because the price of the shares can be influenced by the level of liquidity and demand for the asset (among other things). If you buy at a premium, you may be overpaying for those assets, while selling at a discount means you might not be getting the full value of the assets.

The LIC board may implement measures to close these gaps, such as share buybacks, rights issues, increased marketing efforts, or in extreme cases, winding up the LIC.

Investors must pay a broker to purchase LIC shares, which adds to the cost of investment.

Active ETFs

The value of an active ETF also represents the value of the securities it holds. Its value is determined intraday by dividing its total assets by the number of units on issue.

Active ETFs should trade close to the fund’s underlying NAV of its holdings because when there is excess supply or demand, an internal market-maker steps in to create or redeem units. However, there may also be circumstances where the iNAV – the estimated intraday net assets under value – is inaccurate, particularly where there is a major market event, according to ASIC.

ASIC last week called for a “pause” in the listings of new exchange-traded managed funds that rely on internal market makers to make their market, due to concerns around potential conflicts of interest. A review is currently underway and is expect to last till the end of the year.

Like LICs, investors must pay brokerage to purchase active ETF units, which adds to the cost of investment.

Entry and exit

Unlisted managed funds

For investors wanting to directly purchase units in an unlisted managed fund, managers will typically set a minimum entry threshold. Some managers allow investors to participate in a regular monthly investment plan. Direct investors can withdraw from the fund at any time, although some funds set minimums. Again, this is done via a paper form and payments can take up to a week to appear.

LICs and active ETFs

Investors can buy shares in LICs or units in active ETFs trading on the ASX via a broker. Providers typically have no minimums, but the broker may apply minimums, as they do with shares. To exit these structures, investors must find a willing buyer of their units or shares. In the case of active ETFs, this can be the market maker.

Structures

Unlisted managed fund and active ETFs

Unlisted managed funds are open-ended. This means they’re always open to daily inflows and outflows. If an investor wants to leave the fund, the manager may be forced to liquidate some assets to finance the redemption.

LICs

LICs are closed-ended structures. When an asset manager creates a LIC, they raise capital via an initial product offering (IPO). When the IPO is fully subscribed, they list the company on the ASX and issue shares to the participants. The funds are considered ‘captive’ in the sense that the assets are closed-in for the manager to invest and cannot be redeemed. Investors who did not participate in the IPO can trade shares on the ASX.

This type of closed-end structure can be advantageous for LICs because the portfolio manager doesn’t have to worry about investors pulling money out of the fund.

Distributions/dividends

Unlisted managed funds and active ETFs

In an unlisted managed fund, all net income is distributed on a pre-tax basis and the end investor is liable for any taxation at their marginal tax rate. This may result in unpredictable income streams. The biggest advantage is the investor may be eligible for a discounted capital gains tax concession for assets held longer than 12 months.

An unlisted fund may also present the manager with more flexibility in paying distributions, being able to pay over and above the underlying income levels, through a return of capital. This can be useful where a manager wishes to pay out a set proportion of the fund each year to provide investors with a predictable income stream.

LICs

There are two types of LICs: those that hold their investments on capital account, and those that hold their investments on income account.

The capital account LICs are also known as ‘Buy and Hold’ LICs. These are low turnover and trade rarely. Capital gains from these LICs are eligible for the CGT discount.

Income account LICs are also known as ‘Trading LICs’. These are higher turnover and the profits on trades are treated as income, so they are taxed at the company tax rate and are not eligible for the CGT discount.

Capital account LICs generally pay franked dividends by passing on the franking credits received from their underlying investments. They may withhold some dividend income and franking to be able to smooth dividends from year to year. If the underlying stocks drop their dividends, then more than likely the LIC will have to reduce its dividend.

Income LICs need to build up a profit and franking credit reserve to pay fully-franked dividends. The reserves can be eroded when the market falls, but the LIC may be able to continue to pay dividends for a time depending on the buffer built up.

 

Emma Rapaport is a reporter for Morningstar.com.au. This article is for general information only. It has been prepared without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a licensed financial adviser. Article reproduced with permission. 

 

6 Comments
Dane Allen
August 05, 2019

It’s a bit strange that fundies still play secret squirrel with their portfolios compared to everywhere else where full holdings are disclosed with an appropriate lag. Another reason to largely eschew active especially as majority cant beat the market net of costs. The ‘front running’ excuse for lack of disclosure is nonsense in an efficient market.

Steve
August 02, 2019

I still have a fundamental problem with ETFs no matter what the composition of the fund. When the next market capitulation occurs, the role of the market maker in providing that liquidity will be tested to the extent that there is a flood of sellers and a scarcity of buyers. If the market makers are not willing to step in, liquidity becomes an issue which inevitably leads to the possibility of the ETF not trading at its NAV.

Graeme
August 01, 2019

There are also unlisted investment companies eg. DMXCP and a number of listed managed trusts including FOR, OPH and RF1. Even more choices, or more complication depending on your viewpoint.

Carlos
August 01, 2019

the main downside to LICs is the annoying, frustrating and often inexplicable discounts and premiums to NTA which forever plague the sector.
at least with active ETFs you always buy and sell at, or very close to, NTA. bring on more of them !

michael danziger
August 01, 2019

Impressive article. The only exclusion I noticed was the different tax paid by lics. Franking at 27% or 30%

Craig
August 01, 2019

Nice write up Emma. can you see more LIC wind ups occuring? considering the large amount of substantial and sustained discounts in the sector?

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Know your fund types and structures – an acronym odyssey

ETFs are the Marvel of listed galaxies, even with star WAR

Listed Investment Company deals for 2019

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Unexpected results in our retirement income survey

Who knew? With some surprise results, the Government is on unexpected firm ground in asking people to draw on all their assets in retirement, although the comments show what feisty and informed readers we have.

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Six COVID opportunist stocks prospering in adversity

Some high-quality companies have emerged even stronger since the onset of COVID and are well placed for outperformance. We call these the ‘COVID Opportunists’ as they are now dominating their specific sectors.

Latest Updates

Retirement

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Interviews

Sean Fenton on marching to your own investment tune

Is it more difficult to find stocks to short in a rising market? What impact has central bank dominance had over stock selection? How do you combine income and growth in a portfolio? Where are the opportunities?

Compliance

D’oh! DDO rules turn some funds into a punching bag

The Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO) come into effect in two weeks. They will change the way banks promote products, force some small funds to close to new members and push issues into the listed space.

Shares

Dividends, disruption and star performers in FY21 wrap

Company results in FY21 were generally good with some standout results from those thriving in tough conditions. We highlight the companies that delivered some of the best results and our future  expectations.

Fixed interest

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Investment strategies

Seven factors driving growth in Managed Accounts

As Managed Accounts surge through $100 billion for the first time, the line between retail, wholesale and institutional capabilities and portfolios continues to blur. Lower costs help with best interest duties.

Retirement

Reader Survey: home values in age pension asset test

Read our article on the family home in the age pension test, with the RBA Governor putting the onus on social security to address house prices and the OECD calling out wealthy pensioners. What is your view?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.