Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 243

GPS Framework: A new way to think about SMSF retirement income

Australia’s SMSF retirees should change their thinking about spending their savings to determine the best strategy for retirement, according to new research presented at the recent SMSF Association national conference. The 'GPS Framework' (Grow, Preserve, Spend) helps SMSF retirees set a direction for consumption of their retirement capital.

Melanie Dunn, Accurium’s SMSF Technical Services Manager speaking
at the 2018 SMSF Association National Conference in Sydney.

As people retire the key question changes from ‘Have I saved enough?’ to ‘How much can I spend from these savings?’ To answer this question, the retiree should consider whether their goal is to Grow, Preserve or Spend their savings over retirement.

Chart 1: GPS Framework: setting a direction for retirement spending

At one extreme are people with more than enough who will continue to grow their wealth during retirement. At the other extreme are those who don’t have enough to last and will run out of money. In between are the options of trying to preserve the value of the initial wealth or taking a path that maximises consumption but leaves little or nothing for the next generation.

Are SMSF retirees Growers, Preservers or Spenders?

The Accurium report considers the proportion of SMSF households that fall into the different segments of the GPS Framework. This assessment requires an understanding of the household’s desired spending level and amount of savings at retirement to support that lifestyle.

Accurium’s retirement healthcheck is a retirement planning tool that assesses the likelihood of retired households being able to meet their retirement spending goals. Analysis of nearly 800 SMSF households’ detailed retirement plans over the year to June 2017 showed a range of desired annual spending levels.

Chart 2: Desired annual spending levels in retirement for SMSF trustees

The ASFA Retirement Standard identifies approximately $60,000 per annum as a sufficient budget to enjoy a comfortable standard of living in retirement for a couple. The median spending level in retirement for SMSF couples in the Accurium database was $80,000.

While some households are spending at the ASFA standard or less, other SMSF households are looking forward to a more aspirational lifestyle in retirement. Accurium’s research showed 24% of SMSF couples aiming to spend over $100,000 per annum.

Accurium’s research also suggests that, on average, an SMSF couple might have about 35% of their total retirement savings outside the SMSF. Using SMSF asset data from their actuarial certificate database of over 60,000 SMSFs from the 2015-16 tax-year, Accurium estimated the proportion of 65-year-old SMSF couples with different balances.

Chart 3: Estimated distribution of total savings at retirement for SMSF couples

SMSF retiree balances are typically larger than those of members of other superannuation funds. Accurium estimated the median balance at June 2016 for a two-member SMSF at retirement was around $1,137,000. This is about four times the level of an average APRA-regulated household approaching retirement. The median couple with $1,137,000 in their SMSF therefore might have total retirement savings of around $1,750,000.

Our research shows that about 25% of SMSF retiree couples are Growers, who will increase savings in retirement, 28% are Preservers who will retain the majority of the value of their savings, and just over 20% are Spenders who will spend most of their savings across their retirement, based on a typical SMSF retirement spending goal of $80,000 a year. The remaining 26% are at risk of running out of savings during retirement and might need to spend less so that their money lasts as long as they do.

However, it varies by annual expenditure. While 38% are Growers, 35% Preservers and 18% Spenders at $60,000 a year spending (the ASFA ‘comfortable’ standard), this declines to 18%, 25% and 18% respectively at a more aspirational $100,000 a year spending level because they are spending more of their retirement savings.

Using the GPS Framework when setting retirement income strategies

Accurium’s research concludes that in retirement, it is the level of spending rather than investment returns which is the primary determinant of retirement outcomes. SMSF households can utilise the GPS Framework to assess whether their retirement spending is aligned with their goal to Grow, Preserve or Spend retirement savings.

“Many SMSF retirees adopt similar financial strategies when it comes to spending but this report highlights that retirees should think differently”, says Accurium’s General Manager, Doug McBirnie. “The amount they can spend and the appropriate retirement strategy depends on where they sit in the GPS Framework. The financial risks faced are different in each segment and the GPS Framework can provide a guide for retirees when it comes to setting their retirement income strategy.”

The report suggests that a simple bucket approach to generating retirement income might be appropriate for the limited risks faced by Growers. However, a more detailed cashflow strategy might be needed for Preservers who are more exposed to market timing risks, while Spenders need to focus more on managing the risk of outliving their savings and should consider the benefits of an income layering approach to ensure they have enough to continue to meet their needs.

The full GPS Framework is linked here.


Melanie Dunn is SMSF Technical Services Manager at Accurium, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.



When the $1.6m cap is no longer relevant

Moving your SMSF into pension phase

Misplaced focus on high yielding stocks in retirement


Most viewed in recent weeks

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Two strong themes and companies that will benefit

There are reasons to believe inflation will stay under control, and although we may see a slowing in the global economy, two companies should benefit from the themes of 'Stable Compounders' and 'Structural Winners'.

Latest Updates


Stop treating the family home as a retirement sacred cow

The way home ownership relates to retirement income is rated a 'D', as in Distortion, Decumulation and Denial. For many, their home is their largest asset but it's least likely to be used for retirement income.


Hey boomer, first home buyers and all the fuss

What is APRA worried about? Most mortgagees can easily absorb increases in interest rates without posing a systemic threat to the banking system. Housing lending is a relatively risk-free activity for banks.


Residential Property Survey Q3 2021

Housing market sentiment has eased from record highs and confidence has ticked down as house price rises slow. Construction costs overtook lack of development sites as the biggest impediment for new housing.

Investment strategies

Personal finance is 80% personal and 20% finance

Understanding your own biases and behaviours is even more important than learning about markets. Overcome four major cognitive biases that may be sabotaging your investing and recognise them in others.

Where do stockmarket returns come from over time?

Cash flow statements differ from income statements and balance sheets, and every company must balance payments to investors versus investing into the business. Cash flows drive the value of the business.

Fixed interest

How to invest in the ‘reopening of Australia’ in bonds

As Sydney and Melbourne emerge from lockdown, there are some reopening trades in the Australian credit market which 'sophisticated' investors should consider as part of their fixed income portfolios.


10 trends reshaping the future of emerging markets

Demand for air travel, China’s growing middle-class population, Brazil’s digital payments take-up, Indian IPOs, and increased urbanisation are just some of the trends being seen in emerging economies.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.