Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 243

GPS Framework: A new way to think about SMSF retirement income

Australia’s SMSF retirees should change their thinking about spending their savings to determine the best strategy for retirement, according to new research presented at the recent SMSF Association national conference. The 'GPS Framework' (Grow, Preserve, Spend) helps SMSF retirees set a direction for consumption of their retirement capital.

Melanie Dunn, Accurium’s SMSF Technical Services Manager speaking
at the 2018 SMSF Association National Conference in Sydney.

As people retire the key question changes from ‘Have I saved enough?’ to ‘How much can I spend from these savings?’ To answer this question, the retiree should consider whether their goal is to Grow, Preserve or Spend their savings over retirement.

Chart 1: GPS Framework: setting a direction for retirement spending

At one extreme are people with more than enough who will continue to grow their wealth during retirement. At the other extreme are those who don’t have enough to last and will run out of money. In between are the options of trying to preserve the value of the initial wealth or taking a path that maximises consumption but leaves little or nothing for the next generation.

Are SMSF retirees Growers, Preservers or Spenders?

The Accurium report considers the proportion of SMSF households that fall into the different segments of the GPS Framework. This assessment requires an understanding of the household’s desired spending level and amount of savings at retirement to support that lifestyle.

Accurium’s retirement healthcheck is a retirement planning tool that assesses the likelihood of retired households being able to meet their retirement spending goals. Analysis of nearly 800 SMSF households’ detailed retirement plans over the year to June 2017 showed a range of desired annual spending levels.

Chart 2: Desired annual spending levels in retirement for SMSF trustees

The ASFA Retirement Standard identifies approximately $60,000 per annum as a sufficient budget to enjoy a comfortable standard of living in retirement for a couple. The median spending level in retirement for SMSF couples in the Accurium database was $80,000.

While some households are spending at the ASFA standard or less, other SMSF households are looking forward to a more aspirational lifestyle in retirement. Accurium’s research showed 24% of SMSF couples aiming to spend over $100,000 per annum.

Accurium’s research also suggests that, on average, an SMSF couple might have about 35% of their total retirement savings outside the SMSF. Using SMSF asset data from their actuarial certificate database of over 60,000 SMSFs from the 2015-16 tax-year, Accurium estimated the proportion of 65-year-old SMSF couples with different balances.

Chart 3: Estimated distribution of total savings at retirement for SMSF couples

SMSF retiree balances are typically larger than those of members of other superannuation funds. Accurium estimated the median balance at June 2016 for a two-member SMSF at retirement was around $1,137,000. This is about four times the level of an average APRA-regulated household approaching retirement. The median couple with $1,137,000 in their SMSF therefore might have total retirement savings of around $1,750,000.

Our research shows that about 25% of SMSF retiree couples are Growers, who will increase savings in retirement, 28% are Preservers who will retain the majority of the value of their savings, and just over 20% are Spenders who will spend most of their savings across their retirement, based on a typical SMSF retirement spending goal of $80,000 a year. The remaining 26% are at risk of running out of savings during retirement and might need to spend less so that their money lasts as long as they do.

However, it varies by annual expenditure. While 38% are Growers, 35% Preservers and 18% Spenders at $60,000 a year spending (the ASFA ‘comfortable’ standard), this declines to 18%, 25% and 18% respectively at a more aspirational $100,000 a year spending level because they are spending more of their retirement savings.

Using the GPS Framework when setting retirement income strategies

Accurium’s research concludes that in retirement, it is the level of spending rather than investment returns which is the primary determinant of retirement outcomes. SMSF households can utilise the GPS Framework to assess whether their retirement spending is aligned with their goal to Grow, Preserve or Spend retirement savings.

“Many SMSF retirees adopt similar financial strategies when it comes to spending but this report highlights that retirees should think differently”, says Accurium’s General Manager, Doug McBirnie. “The amount they can spend and the appropriate retirement strategy depends on where they sit in the GPS Framework. The financial risks faced are different in each segment and the GPS Framework can provide a guide for retirees when it comes to setting their retirement income strategy.”

The report suggests that a simple bucket approach to generating retirement income might be appropriate for the limited risks faced by Growers. However, a more detailed cashflow strategy might be needed for Preservers who are more exposed to market timing risks, while Spenders need to focus more on managing the risk of outliving their savings and should consider the benefits of an income layering approach to ensure they have enough to continue to meet their needs.

The full GPS Framework is linked here.

 

Melanie Dunn is SMSF Technical Services Manager at Accurium, a sponsor of Cuffelinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

When the $1.6m cap is no longer relevant

Moving your SMSF into pension phase

Misplaced focus on high yielding stocks in retirement

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Lessons when a fund manager of the year is down 25%

Every successful fund manager suffers periods of underperformance, and investors who jump from fund to fund chasing results are likely to do badly. Selecting a manager is a long-term decision but what else?

2022 election survey results: disillusion and disappointment

In almost 1,000 responses, our readers differ in voting intentions versus polling of the general population, but they have little doubt who will win and there is widespread disappointment with our politics.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Betting markets as election predictors

Believe it or not, betting agencies are in the business of making money, not predicting outcomes. Is there anything we can learn from the current odds on the election results?

Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 455 with weekend update

The resolve of many investors to focus on the long term with their share portfolios is increasingly tested as the list of negatives lengthens. There is a lack of visionary policies during an election campaign and stimulatory spending is contradicting the aims of tighter monetary policy.

  • 28 April 2022

Latest Updates

In praise of our unique democracy and its sausage

For all the shortcomings of our political campaigns, our election process is the best. We are blessed with honest administrators and procedures that we all trust to hand over power peacefully, with a big snag. 

Investment strategies

Is the investing landscape really different this time?

Many market analysts argue that the pandemic has changed everything but we must judge whether the circumstances are as drastic as billed. A quick review of four major events helps decide if this time is different.

Economy

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Retirement

When will I retire? Economic impact of an ageing population

About 39% of the labour force is aged over 45. Intergenerational reports highlight the challenges of an ageing population and the impacts on consumption patterns, dependencies, public finances and economic growth.

The real story behind the crypto crash

The recent sell-off in the crypto market and its trigger - the collapse of the Terra UST coin - has affected many institutions either holding or trading crypto assets, including crypto fund managers.

Investment strategies

Cash is the nightingale, the bird in the hand

The bird in the hand is worth two in the bush, and it's an apt metaphor for investment choices. In 2021, as investors hunted in the bush for decent returns, demand overwhelmed supply. Cash is the bird in the hand.

Strategy

Book review of 'Putin’s People' and his motivation for war

Author Catherine Belton argues Putin’s sole ambition is to hold onto power. Her book seeks to understand why Putin invaded Ukraine after he became isolated and out of touch with reality during the pandemic.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.