Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 280

When the $1.6m cap is no longer relevant

The year is rapidly drawing to a close, which means it’s highly likely that you will now hold completed financial statements for your SMSF. If your balance is over $1.6 million, the first thing you may notice is that your imputation credits refund is down from last year.

This is due to the change in rules made by the Turnbull Government, which restricted the amount that could be held in tax-free pension mode to $1.6 million, leaving the rest of the fund’s earnings to be taxed at 15%.

When trustees no longer need to worry about the cap

The next thing you might discover is that the $1.6 million that was your Transfer Balance Cap (TBC) at 30 June 2017 has now grown. It could easily be worth as much as $1.7 million if your fund earned, say, 7%, while you drew the mandatory pension of 4%.

This situation has triggered a few emails asking what the trustees of the fund should do. Will the TBC now stay at $1.7 million or will it go back to $1.6 million if the amount in pension mode drops as a result of bad performance or increased pension drawings in the current year?

Superannuation guru Monica Rule has good news for you. She tells me that your TBC is no longer relevant, provided the documentation was done properly as at 30 June 2017. As long as your fund did the paperwork correctly on that date, the fund trustees no longer have to concern themselves with the $1.6 million TBC.

Thus, there is no limit to what your super in pension mode could grow to if you had excellent returns, way in excess of the compulsory drawdowns. And there is no penalty if, for any number of reasons, the amount you hold in pension mode drops below $1.6 million.

Continue to draw minimum

But one factor is critical. If all or part of your fund is in pension mode, you are required to draw a set percentage of the balance of the fund that was in pension mode at 30 June. The factor is 4% for anybody under 65 and rises progressively to 14% at age 95 and above.

Age Minimum pension drawdown factors
55–64 4%
65–74 5%
75–79 6%
80–84 7%
85–89 9%
90–94 11%
95 or older 14%

For example, if you are aged between 65 and 74 you should be withdrawing at least 5% of the previous June balance each year. Therefore, if your balance was $1.6 million at 30 June 2017, you should have drawn $80,000 in pension for the year ended 30 June 2018. However, if your financial statements now show that your TBC has become $1.7 million, you will need to increase your drawdowns in the present year to $85,000.

This is a further example of the complexity of our superannuation system, and the dangers for people running SMSFs who don’t get it right. Despite the penalties, which can be heavy, I am still amazed by the number of questions I receive from people who obviously don’t know what they’re doing. Often, they simply don’t know what they don’t know. This is an area where expert advice is critical.

 

Noel Whittaker is the author of Making Money Made Simple and numerous other books on personal finance. Contact him on [email protected]

 

  •   14 November 2018
  • 5
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Moving your SMSF into pension phase

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

2 billion reasons to fix retirement income

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Latest Updates

Exchange traded products

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Taxation

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Retirement

Three considerations before reshaping your legacy plan

Many retirees hope to leave a legacy. Proposed trust tax reforms could force families to rethink. The question is not how much to leave behind, but whether today's inheritance plans will still make sense as circumstances change.

Investment strategies

Why experienced investors still get markets wrong

Retirement is approaching. Markets are noisy. And every headline seems to demand action. The biggest investment risk isn't fear, greed or market volatility, it often arrives disguised as research and sensible risk management.

Shares

Why pay more for less?

Conditions were stacked in favour of professional investors in 2026. Most still fell short, raising questions about where investors should look for value. Meanwhile, an alternative strategy continued to make its case.

Investment strategies

Bleeding air out of the bubble

Equity valuations have fallen sharply over the past year, yet investors have largely been spared the volatility and losses that typically accompany a de-rating. What explains this unusually orderly reset? Here are five key drivers.

Strategy

Has AI gone rogue?

We worry about AI becoming conscious. But what if consciousness isn't the issue? The more unsettling possibility is a machine capable of pursuing objectives relentlessly, without motives, emotions, or awareness of any kind.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.