Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 356

Payment deferrals more expensive than borrowers expect

It has been reported that more than 320,000 home owners and 170,000 businesses have put loan repayments totalling $6.8 billion on hold since banks first announced support for borrowers as the Covid-19 pandemic unfolded.

Most banks introduced a loan deferral arrangement where loan repayments could be suspended for up to six months. But it’s important to note that this is a payment holiday, not debt forgiveness. Interest will continue to accrue on outstanding loan balances and will be capitalised.

The financial implications of taking up such offers is therefore worth considering.

How much extra will be repaid? 

Assume a 25-year principal and interest loan, established five years ago. The current variable interest rate is 3.5%, and the current minimum monthly loan repayment of $2,030 has just been locked in. The outstanding loan balance is $350,000 and loan repayments will be postponed for the next six months.

If at the end of the deferral period, the borrower resumed paying down the loan at the minimum amount of $2,030 per month, then the term of the loan would be extended by a little more than 12 months, and an additional $12,544 would be paid over the term of the loan.

Alternatively, in order to repay the loan in full by the end of the original 25-year term, some $72 per month extra would be required, being an additional $4,765 paid over the loan’s term.

Loan payment deferral is expensive

Deferring loan repayments therefore comes at a significant cost, and the full implications need to be understood prior to undertaking such an approach. Perhaps reduced payments instead of no payments could be discussed with banks, to lessen the blow on the other side. For example, an arrangement whereby interest only is payable for the six months, and no principal.

Then CBA Chief Executive, Matt Comyn, said the following after the Reserve Bank cut interest rates by 0.25%:

“We will also help up to 730,000 customers by reducing repayments to the minimum required under their loan contract from 1 May. On average, this will release up to $400 per month for customers and create up to $3.6 billion in additional cash support for our economy. Customers will be able to opt out after the change is effective should they wish to keep their current repayment”.

When the interest rate on a variable rate property loan reduces, the amount required to pay the loan out over the original term will also reduce. But many CBA customers choose to continue to pay the higher amount, thus reducing the loan term. And if they do want to pay the minimum, they must contact the bank to ask for payments to be reduced. That is, it is an 'opt in' arrangement.

But what CBA proposed is the reverse. An 'opt out' arrangement whereby the loan will automatically revert to the minimum required payment on 1 May, unless the customer actively vetoes the procedure.

This will also have consequences for borrowers. Five years ago, the official cash rate was 2.25%. So let’s assume our 25-year principal and interest example loan established five years ago, commenced at a variable interest rate of 5.5%. The original loan amount was $392,000 with a monthly loan repayment of $2,408. Assume the monthly repayment was left unchanged over the five years. So that now, with the loan balance at $350,000 and the variable interest rate at 3.5%, the minimum monthly payment required to pay the loan out in 20 years as already noted, is $2,030. That is, $378 less per month.

But if the customer opts out of the proposed CBA arrangement, maintaining repayments at $2,408, the loan will be paid out in 15.8 years, cutting 4.2 years off the loan term, and saving about $31,000 in interest.

Most people do not respond to 'opt out' requests. There is little doubt that customers will unwittingly or otherwise not 'opt out'. And if that happens, the financial consequences for the borrower are significant. While the CBA says this approach will 'help up to 730,000 customers' in terms of cash flow, one wonders if it really does help overall.

 

Tony Dillon is a freelance writer and former actuary. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Should I pay off the mortgage or top up my superannuation?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?

Interviews

Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.

Superannuation

Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.