Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 356

Payment deferrals more expensive than borrowers expect

It has been reported that more than 320,000 home owners and 170,000 businesses have put loan repayments totalling $6.8 billion on hold since banks first announced support for borrowers as the Covid-19 pandemic unfolded.

Most banks introduced a loan deferral arrangement where loan repayments could be suspended for up to six months. But it’s important to note that this is a payment holiday, not debt forgiveness. Interest will continue to accrue on outstanding loan balances and will be capitalised.

The financial implications of taking up such offers is therefore worth considering.

How much extra will be repaid? 

Assume a 25-year principal and interest loan, established five years ago. The current variable interest rate is 3.5%, and the current minimum monthly loan repayment of $2,030 has just been locked in. The outstanding loan balance is $350,000 and loan repayments will be postponed for the next six months.

If at the end of the deferral period, the borrower resumed paying down the loan at the minimum amount of $2,030 per month, then the term of the loan would be extended by a little more than 12 months, and an additional $12,544 would be paid over the term of the loan.

Alternatively, in order to repay the loan in full by the end of the original 25-year term, some $72 per month extra would be required, being an additional $4,765 paid over the loan’s term.

Loan payment deferral is expensive

Deferring loan repayments therefore comes at a significant cost, and the full implications need to be understood prior to undertaking such an approach. Perhaps reduced payments instead of no payments could be discussed with banks, to lessen the blow on the other side. For example, an arrangement whereby interest only is payable for the six months, and no principal.

Then CBA Chief Executive, Matt Comyn, said the following after the Reserve Bank cut interest rates by 0.25%:

“We will also help up to 730,000 customers by reducing repayments to the minimum required under their loan contract from 1 May. On average, this will release up to $400 per month for customers and create up to $3.6 billion in additional cash support for our economy. Customers will be able to opt out after the change is effective should they wish to keep their current repayment”.

When the interest rate on a variable rate property loan reduces, the amount required to pay the loan out over the original term will also reduce. But many CBA customers choose to continue to pay the higher amount, thus reducing the loan term. And if they do want to pay the minimum, they must contact the bank to ask for payments to be reduced. That is, it is an 'opt in' arrangement.

But what CBA proposed is the reverse. An 'opt out' arrangement whereby the loan will automatically revert to the minimum required payment on 1 May, unless the customer actively vetoes the procedure.

This will also have consequences for borrowers. Five years ago, the official cash rate was 2.25%. So let’s assume our 25-year principal and interest example loan established five years ago, commenced at a variable interest rate of 5.5%. The original loan amount was $392,000 with a monthly loan repayment of $2,408. Assume the monthly repayment was left unchanged over the five years. So that now, with the loan balance at $350,000 and the variable interest rate at 3.5%, the minimum monthly payment required to pay the loan out in 20 years as already noted, is $2,030. That is, $378 less per month.

But if the customer opts out of the proposed CBA arrangement, maintaining repayments at $2,408, the loan will be paid out in 15.8 years, cutting 4.2 years off the loan term, and saving about $31,000 in interest.

Most people do not respond to 'opt out' requests. There is little doubt that customers will unwittingly or otherwise not 'opt out'. And if that happens, the financial consequences for the borrower are significant. While the CBA says this approach will 'help up to 730,000 customers' in terms of cash flow, one wonders if it really does help overall.


Tony Dillon is a freelance writer and former actuary. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.



Most viewed in recent weeks

Unexpected results in our retirement income survey

Who knew? With some surprise results, the Government is on unexpected firm ground in asking people to draw on all their assets in retirement, although the comments show what feisty and informed readers we have.

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Six COVID opportunist stocks prospering in adversity

Some high-quality companies have emerged even stronger since the onset of COVID and are well placed for outperformance. We call these the ‘COVID Opportunists’ as they are now dominating their specific sectors.

Latest Updates


10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?


Sean Fenton on marching to your own investment tune

Is it more difficult to find stocks to short in a rising market? What impact has central bank dominance had over stock selection? How do you combine income and growth in a portfolio? Where are the opportunities?


D’oh! DDO rules turn some funds into a punching bag

The Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO) come into effect in two weeks. They will change the way banks promote products, force some small funds to close to new members and push issues into the listed space.


Dividends, disruption and star performers in FY21 wrap

Company results in FY21 were generally good with some standout results from those thriving in tough conditions. We highlight the companies that delivered some of the best results and our future  expectations.

Fixed interest

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Investment strategies

Seven factors driving growth in Managed Accounts

As Managed Accounts surge through $100 billion for the first time, the line between retail, wholesale and institutional capabilities and portfolios continues to blur. Lower costs help with best interest duties.


Reader Survey: home values in age pension asset test

Read our article on the family home in the age pension test, with the RBA Governor putting the onus on social security to address house prices and the OECD calling out wealthy pensioners. What is your view?



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.