Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 12

There’s no such thing as an average investor

Last week’s Cuffelinks contained three interesting articles on life expectancy, lifecycle funds and investment strategies. Amongst other things, these articles discussed the following concepts:

  • the ability of the state to pay the age pension due to the decreasing number of workers versus the increasing number of retirees
  • the appropriateness of having a more conservative investment allocation as we grow older, and whether superannuation funds should be structured so this happens automatically.

Here are some comments based on my observations as a financial planner, and many years discussing retirement and superannuation with clients.

Although the raising of the superannuation guarantee charge to 12% of salary will assist many to accumulate enough money for their retirement, for most this comes too late as they have not had enough time to benefit from the government initiative. Treasury’s 2010 Intergenerational Report projects that by 2050, 75% of the population will still be receiving some age pension.

I have come across many people in their late 50s who have relatively small amounts of super but live in a home that is debt free. One challenge for them is to fund the gap between the time they finish work and the time they can access the age pension.

An ABS study, the 2010-11 Multipurpose Household Survey, revealed a significant gap between the average retirement age and the age pension age. According to the survey, the average age at retirement from the labour force for people aged 45 years and over in 2010-11 was 53.3 years (57.9 years for men and 49.6 years for women). Of the 1.4 million men who had retired from the labour force:

  • 27% had retired aged less than 55 years
  • 53% had retired aged 55-64 years
  • 20% had retired aged 65 years and over.

Although many people in their late 50s and early 60s would like to continue working, a high percentage of them are not able to do this. According to the ABS study, 36% were made redundant or got sick. In my experience, relatively few finish work because they have enough money. Many are forced into lower income jobs, perhaps because they are considered to be more expensive or less innovative than younger people. Perhaps they no longer ‘fit in’ with younger colleagues.

I suspect that in future years this problem will become more significant. The high cost of housing and the associated debt repayments, plus the inclination to pay for private schooling means that many Generation X families are spending their entire incomes and saving nothing beyond the minimum superannuation requirements. In many cases, affordability of their current lifestyle and preferences is only possible because both parents work and interest rates are low.

Annuities or endowment funds have been mentioned as a potential solution to the longevity problem. This might seem a reasonable idea if these products are CPI-linked, but if they aren’t, unforeseen rises in interest rates and inflation will be disastrous for people who lock into annuities at today’s low rates.

The two most important messages I give to clients about superannuation are:

  • during your working life you must build up sufficient money to create an income stream that will last for the 25 years or more you will spend not working
  • once you have finished work, your super must grow faster than tax and inflation, and if it doesn’t, then you may run out of money.

I suspect ‘lifecycle’ funds fail these tests in two ways. Firstly, they move members’ money from ‘risky’ assets to ‘secure’ assets too soon. Secondly, in the current environment, ‘secure’ assets are not delivering returns that exceed tax and inflation.

In essence there are four parties that can help super fund members with their investment decisions – the government, the super fund manager, a financial adviser and the member themselves. The government has a duty to incentivise people to secure their own retirement because the government knows they will not have the money to pay for health and pensions over coming decades. Based on demographics and the ageing of our population, there will only be 3.5 workers for every retiree in 2025. If the government ignores this statistic and introduces policies that assume that the average retirement age will rise to 73, there will be negative ramifications if it does not come to pass.

Wealth managers also have a duty of care as they are the trustees of super funds. They appear to have two choices when it comes to default design under the MySuper regulations – a lifecycle approach or a balanced fund approach (where asset allocation is not linked to age). Members can of course opt out and choose from a number of asset allocations based on risk profile (defensive, conservative, balanced, growth, etc). This relies on the member choosing the right profile. Whether a member remains in the default option or makes an active choice, neither solution is perfect.

Into this imperfect world steps the financial planner. He or she should have the experience, ability, desire and tools to guide a member into the most appropriate investment option. The advice is based on individual circumstances and should involve the following steps:

  • establish how long the member has between now and retirement
  • find out how much super they have already and what they are contributing
  • help the person assess how much income they will need in retirement
  • calculate the shortfall or surplus based on some assumptions about future employment income and fund performance
  • if there is a shortfall, will non super investments or the age pension cover it?
  • if not, the member either has to save more money, accept a lower retirement income or try and achieve better performance.

An individual can follow these steps themselves but I question whether most have the time or the expertise.

The actions of governments and super fund managers are based on actuarial statistics focussed on averages. But the average investor does not exist. The true value of a financial planner is the ability to blend a super fund member’s personal situation, objectives, time frame and risk profile with the generalist policies of governments, super fund managers and administrators.

 

Rick Cosier runs an independently-owned financial planning business, Healthy Finances Pty Ltd.

 

  •   26 April 2013
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

When you can withdraw your super

Should access to super and pensions depend on life expectancy?

When will I retire? Economic impact of an ageing population

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Retirement income expectations hit new highs

Younger Australians think they’ll need $100k a year in retirement - nearly double what current retirees spend. Expectations are rising fast, but are they realistic or just another case of lifestyle inflation?

Four best-ever charts for every adviser and investor

In any year since 1875, if you'd invested in the ASX, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods. It's just one of the must-have stats that all investors should know.

Why super returns may be heading lower

Five mega trends point to risks of a more inflation prone and lower growth environment. This, along with rich market valuations, should constrain medium term superannuation returns to around 5% per annum.

Preparing for aged care

Whether for yourself or a family member, it’s never too early to start thinking about aged care. This looks at the best ways to plan ahead, as well as the changes coming to aged care from November 1 this year.

Our experts on Jim Chalmers' super tax backdown

Labor has caved to pressure on key parts of the Division 296 tax, though also added some important nuances. Here are six experts’ views on the changes and what they mean for you.        

Why I dislike dividend stocks

If you need income then buying dividend stocks makes perfect sense. But if you don’t then it makes little sense because it’s likely to limit building real wealth. Here’s what you should do instead.

Latest Updates

Investment strategies

LICs vs ETFs – which perform best?

With investor sentiment shifting and ETFs surging ahead, we pit Australia’s biggest LICs against their ETF rivals to see which delivers better returns over the short and long term. The results are revealing.

Retirement

The growing debt burden of retiring Australians

More Australians are retiring with larger mortgages and less super. This paper explores how unlocking housing wealth can help ease the nation’s growing retirement cashflow crunch.

The ASX is full of broken blue chips

Investing in the ASX 20 or 200 requires vigilance. Blue chips aren’t immune to failure, and the old belief that you can simply hold them forever is outdated. 

Shares

Buying Guzman y Gomez, and not just for the burritos

Adding high-quality compounders at attractive valuations is difficult in an efficient market. However, during the volatile FY25 reporting season, an opportunity arose to increase a position in Mexican fast-food chain GYG.

Investment strategies

Factor investing and how to use ETFs to your advantage

Factor-based ETFs are bridging the gap between active and passive investing, giving investors low-cost access to proven drivers of long-term returns such as quality, value, momentum and dividend yield. 

Strategy

Engineers vs lawyers: the US-China divide that will shape this century

In Breakneck, Dan Wang contrasts China’s “engineering state” with America’s “lawyerly society,” showing how these mindsets drive innovation, dysfunction, and reshape global power amid rising rivalry. 

Retirement

18 rules for ageing well

The rules to age successfully include, 'the unexamined life lasts longer', 'change no more than one-eighth of your life at a time', 'nobody is thinking about you', and 'pursue virtue but don’t sweat it'.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.