Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 124

Busting the bond myth

The decline in interest rates to historic lows in recent years has led to anxiety among Australian investors about what will happen to their fixed interest holdings when overnight interest rates begin to rise.

This apprehension is based on the conventional view that longer-dated bonds underperform in this type of rising interest rate environment.

However, historical analysis of past periods of increasing interest rates in the US and Australia show there is no guarantee that bonds do badly relative to short-dated securities at such times.

In fact, in most of the five distinct periods covered by this study, longer-dated bonds outperformed their shorter-dated equivalents.

The second deduction from this analysis is the reinforcement of the virtues of global diversification in fixed interest. In each period, a globally diversified portfolio of bonds outperformed an Australian-only portfolio.

Thirdly, the experiment confirms that even during periods of rising short-term interest rates, bonds can continue to play a diversification role in a balanced portfolio, reducing overall volatility and expanding investors’ opportunity set.

Background

Interest rates and monetary conditions in developed economies have been maintained at extraordinarily easy levels since the global financial crisis as central banks sought to generate self-sustaining recoveries.

A dominant theme recently relates to how and when central banks will start to reduce this level of accommodation and what the impact on risky assets will be. Market sentiment has waxed and waned. Most attention has been on the US Federal Reserve, which has flagged an increase in its funds target rate over the coming months. The rate has been close to zero now for nearly seven years since the peak of the GFC.

The Fed began the process of normalising monetary policy in late 2013, gradually winding back its purchases of bonds. This ‘quantitative easing’ programme added more than $US3.5 trillion to the Fed’s balance sheet over five years.

But central banks elsewhere have shown no hurry to follow. The Bank of England has kept its benchmark at 0.50% for six years. At its August 2015 meeting, just one of the nine members of its monetary policy committee voted for an increase.

The European Central Bank, having resisted quantitative easing for years, began its own programme this year. It is buying 60 billion euros of assets a month in a bid to lift inflation back towards its target of just under 2% by late 2016.

The Reserve Bank of Australia has cut the official cash rate 10 times since November 2011 to 2.0%. With commodity prices falling and inflation pressures contained, the bank has recently indicated that it is in no hurry to raise rates.

Bonds 101

The market values of bonds rise and fall on changing expectations for inflation and interest rates, shifting perceptions about the creditworthiness of individual issuers, and fluctuations in the general appetite for risk.

The yield on a bond and the price of that bond are inversely related. If the price falls, it means investors are demanding an additional return to compensate for the risk of holding the bond.

So if interest rates ‘can only go up’ from current levels, why hold bonds? There are a few points to make in response.

First, it is extremely hard to accurately forecast interest rates with any consistency. Standard & Poor’s regular scorecard shows most managers fail to outpace bond benchmarks over periods of five years or more (Standard & Poor’s Indices Versus Active Funds Scorecard).

Second, outside of the US, there is no guarantee that rates will rise anytime soon. Even in the US, some observers doubt whether the Fed will carry through.

Third, bonds perform differently to shares. Regardless of what is happening with the rate cycle, there is a diversification benefit in holding bonds in your portfolio and making for a smoother ride.

Fourth, each investor’s allocation to the risks associated with bonds, both from a maturity and credit quality standpoint, is an individual decision dependent on each individual’s risk appetite, circumstances and goals.

Finally, if you look at history, it has not always been the case that longer-term bonds have underperformed shorter-term bonds when short-term interest rates are rising.

A case study

To test that last statement, we carried out a case study of periods of rising rates from the last three decades in both the US and Australia.

To meet the definition of a rising interest rate environment, the increases had to be spread out over 12 months or more and cumulative increases had to be at least 1.5%. Table 2 shows the periods under study.

In the US case, using Barclays’ indices, we found that in two of these four periods long-term bonds did better than shorter-to-intermediate-term bonds. In the other two periods longer term bonds underperformed. See Figure 1.

For the Australian case study we used Citigroup World Government Bond indices. Figure 2 compares the performance of Australian Government bonds over the 1-3-year maturity (in blue) and longer maturities (in green).

We can see that the longer-term bonds actually outperformed the shorter-dated bonds during all periods except for the infamous 1994–95 market correction.

Similar results were seen when we compared the performance of a global bond portfolio, hedged to the $A, compared with a domestic-only portfolio.

While this may seem counter-intuitive, remember that longer-term bond holders are often reassured when a central bank is perceived as moving pre-emptively against this threat of higher inflation.

The study also shows bonds continued to provide positive returns, contradicting the often expressed view that rising interest rates are always associated with bond losses. The exception in this study is the late 70s when the longest-term US bonds suffered during a period of very sharp increases in rates.

Summary

Investors are worried about what will happen to their fixed income portfolios when central banks begin normalising interest rates, yet recent decades show longer-term bonds do not always underperform when short-term rates are rising.

In any case, there is no need to forecast. There is sufficient information in today’s prices to base a strategy on. Furthermore, we believe risk can be tempered by diversifying across different types of bonds, different maturities and different countries.

 

Dr Steve Garth is a Portfolio Manager in Sydney with Dimensional, a wholesale asset manager with more than $500 billion under management globally. This article is for educational purposes and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Stars align for fixed income

Is 'shaken and stirred' coming? The risky business of bonds

Are you in fixed interest for the duration?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.