Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 427

Antipodes’ Jacob Mitchell on his biggest investing lessons

Jacob Mitchell is Founder and Chief Investment Officer of Antipodes Partners, managing over $8 billion and part of the Pinnacle Group. Jacob spent 14 years at Platinum Asset Management before starting Antipodes in 2015.

GH: What attracted you into this business at the start?

JM: Even in high school, I was interested in understanding linkages between business, the world economy and politics, and looking up the stock pages - what it meant and why share prices react. It became a lifelong pursuit, and I was fortunate to start my career with a fundamental approach to company analysis and (at?) an early quantamental shop. That put me on a journey to global equities at Platinum and then to starting Antipodes in 2015.

GH: And if after all this time, you could go back and give your 20-year-old self one lesson which you didn't fully appreciate at the time, what would that be?

JM: As we've gone through each cycle, policy responses have become more and more dramatic, and we've now gone way beyond cutting interest rates to extraordinarily imaginative policies with QE and central banks socialising credit risk. The key lesson is don't underestimate how pragmatic central banks will be in the face of weakening economies.

And western central banks, especially, are committed to protecting asset prices as the key transmission to the real economy. They talk about targeting inflation but really, they're targeting and supporting the economy via higher asset prices – understanding, in my earlier years, how extreme this would become would have been helpful.

GH: Yes, it has been extraordinary how much support the central banks keep giving. You specialise in global equities and we have seen more Australian investors allocating to global whereas in the past the home bias dominated. What do you tell investors are the main reasons to hold global equities?

JM: The great opportunity is to diversify from a relatively-concentrated Australian stock market, especially away from financial and resources, and also domestic economic risk. Australia is a concentrated play on the health of the local economy and the health of China.

And the other opportunity is exposure to sectors that are not represented in the local stock market, such as semiconductors, critical enabling technology where the leading companies are American, Japanese, Taiwanese, Korean and European but not Australian. If you want to participate in certain parts of the market,  you have to go offshore.

GH: We’ve had a great run in the market since the GFC and it recovered quickly from COVID. As purchase prices drive future returns, do you think it will be difficult for equities to perform as well over the next 10 years as they have over the last 10?

JM: Most definitely, yes. The best predictor of future returns is the starting multiple and that is elevated. It is very high in the US and the US represents roughly 60% of the global benchmark. So we struggle with the valuations for US equities, which are roughly 65% more expensive than the rest of the world, close to all-time highs. And then the other 40% is quite cheap in an absolute sense, certainly allowing for interest rates, and in a relative sense, as cheap as it's ever been.

GH: Compared with the US?

JM: You've got this bifurcation in potential outcomes, I think similar to 2000. There is P/E dispersion everywhere, even in the US and the US represents our largest exposure. Yes, we're underweight the benchmark significantly, but it's still a large exposure for our portfolio.

GH: It's very difficult to ignore the US in a global portfolio. What percentage of your book is in the US?

JM: In our long exposure, it's roughly 40% versus a benchmark of 60%. The average P/E valuation is hiding some very expensive stocks and some very cheap stocks, so we still think there are great stock picking opportunities and we do see different investment cycles starting to emerge, such as decarbonisation.

GH: Are there any big market trends you're backing at the moment and a couple of companies in this trend?

JM: Yes, we see reopenings emerge at a different pace around the world. One sweet spot in the next 18 months will be a return to cross border travel. Europe as an economy will do quite well and it has underperformed the US because it's so much more dependent on international tourism. So we broadly want to be exposed to Europe domestics, whether it's financials, specific travel exposures like Airbus and GE.

Then on the consumer side of travel, a company like Ctrip. It’s the leading online travel portal in China with a high share of outbound bookings and a dominant position. It’s a part of the market that's not experienced a proper recovery so stocks are quite cheap. It’s a structural opportunity. We are constructive on the emergence of the Chinese middle class, and the aspirational premium consumers that we may have forgotten. But they will come back to travel. They love spending on luxury and that spending hasn't gone away.

The theme with deep implications is decarbonisation.

Investors often play conceptual stocks as opposed to thinking about what it really means, and it means a lot for power infrastructure. It will take years. It changes the fundamental underlying composition of capital spending towards power infrastructure.

It’s a little bit like cloud computing. In the early days of the emergence of cloud computing and the evolution of SAAS software models, you really needed to work out what the longer-term implications were because it was a trend that will be around for a while.

GH: It will play out over decades. Are you seeing some winners in that space or is it too early?

JM: We like three themes. A utility company with sound regulatory protections that we like is Fortis, which will connect renewable energy to load centres. Then there’s the ‘picks and shovel’ stocks like Siemens, which is well exposed to this capex cycle of reengineering the industrial base and reinforcing the grid. And third, companies in the materials space that need to decarbonise or build that power infrastructure. Switching the auto fleet to EVs changes the demand profile for copper. Also, aluminium has an excellent supply story as China has stopped adding capacity, and it has a great demand story as a lightweight metal. So those three buckets are all interesting.

GH: And you talk about the market “irrational extrapolating”. What's a good example of that?

JM: Well, look at what's happening in China with tech regulation. We think the market is extrapolating in a somewhat irrational manner. We acknowledge the uncertainty but in some ways, China is catching up to the rest of the world in terms of anti-monopoly, consumer data protection, cyber security. We don't think this is a move by the Chinese Government to stamp out these companies in their provision of consumer and ecommerce services. They still want to encourage basic consumer services and successful businesses.

Look at patents which originate in China. There is a critical dependency and that innovation is coming out of the private sector, it's not the state-owned enterprises. I think the Government wants to coexist with the private sector and as investors, we should be able to navigate that uncertainty and use it to our advantage because I think it will reduce over time.

The strongest, largest and most dominant companies are in the best position to face that regulation, as we've seen with Facebook and the dominant tech companies in the world. When uncertainty has come to the fore, it’s typically an opportunity to buy the company cheaply. And then, as uncertainties dissipate, it's typically those larger companies that have the financial and business capabilities to implement the change. Ironically, the regulations have reinforced their dominance because they have the resources to deal with the issues.


Register here to receive the Firstlinks weekly newsletter for free

GH: Let’s look at your listed vehicles, the closed-end LIC (ASX:APL) and your plan to give investors the choice to switch into your open-ended active ETF (ASX:AGX1). Can you give some insight into why the Board chose this approach when other methods have been tried in the past, such as a tender offer structure, as the best way to remove any discount in the share price to Net Tangible Assets (NTA).

JM:  AGX1, as an exchange-traded active ETF, solves permanently the NTA discount. So while we took a path to get there - buybacks, tender offer - it is the best outcome. It's the same approach, but within a long only rather than long-short strategy, same investment philosophy, same investment team. And combining the two gives better scale and solves permanently the NTA issue.

GH: Is there any concern on your part that whereas previously, you had locked-in capital, investors can now redeem from an active ETF, that maybe there will be some loss of funds?

JM: Retention of FUM is a function of communication and performance, and we think the future is active ETFs. If we do our job, we'll retain our investors but ultimately it's their choice, but we thought this was an elegant solution to the discount problem.

GH: A final question. Is there a stock in your portfolio that you're confident you will still hold 10 years from now?

JM: Well, repeating based on the great long-term opportunity, Siemens will reengineer industrial supply chains and power. If you think of the businesses that Siemens is in - supply chain solutions, manufacturing solutions, infrastructure, fortifying the grid, reducing emissions – we’ve never seen anything like this, and Siemens is going to be the stock. These are long-term capex growth exposures, and the growth rate will accelerate over the next couple of decades, and the market is significantly underestimating the long-term value of the company.

The stock I’ve owned the longest is Microsoft. It can be decades before the market efficiently prices the asset. Microsoft is getting there, Siemens hasn't even started.

Engineers, designers, once they’re trained on these Siemens tools, it becomes similar to the Microsoft suite. It’s easy to keep using it.

 

Graham Hand is Managing Editor of Firstlinks. Jacob Mitchell is Founder and Chief Investment Officer of Antipodes Partners, managing over $8 billion and part of the Pinnacle Group, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is an edited transcript and the general information does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

6 Comments
C
October 01, 2021

Temporary emergency measures to help businesses in unforeseeable events such as this pandemic are warranted but those measures need to be wound back. Central banks shouldn’t keep the zombie companies alive in the name of full employment. Let them go bankrupt, let capital be utilised in the most efficient and effective way. Enhance the social welfare system and let it take care of the unemployed.

According to a Bank of England study the massive and continuous QEs for the 10 years followed GFC have benefited everyone but those with assets (myself included) benefited most and thus widening the gap between rich and poor. This got to be stopped.

This morning I saw headline that Josh is talking about cutting taxes again. I will read the details when I have the time. But I hope he won’t be cutting the taxes of the well off again. One needs to recognise that luck plays a big part in one’s ability to earn money and it’s not only about hard work, personal choice and being smart. For those of us who are fortunate enough, we need to take care of the weak and unfortunate. If we don’t we will have a Trump. We would be all worse off as individual and as a society to have a Trump in this country - well, we already have some very good candidates, ironically some jesuits who are supposed to the men for others.

Jim Carroll
September 30, 2021

Investors should carefully assess a Fund Manager’s performance. In early 2017 the SP of APL was approx. $1.05 and today it is $1.14. The NTA has risen from approx. $1.05 to $1.20 over the same period. 

Jim
October 14, 2021

Yep, Jim. Antipodes is a real head scratcher. 

Kien Choong
September 30, 2021

It seems unfortunate that central banks act to support asset prices vs keeping unemployment low!

C
September 30, 2021

We already have active ETFs, i.e. those well priced LICs, which I consider of good value. For extra few bps you get a professional keep an eye on the market and all the tax advantages. Active managers who can prove their long term performance don’t need to resort to Active ETF label to build up FUM. I would be checking the fees of any product labelled as active ETF.

sandgroper
October 03, 2021

C, you seem to think active ETFs are a marketing trick, they aren’t. Active ETFs (open-ended trusts, trade at NAV) are entirely different structures to LICs (closed-end companies, trade at a premium/discount to NAV). LICs are a dream for managers as they are permanent capital (as alluded to in the article), whereas active ETFs will grow and shrink in size in response to performance.

It is a myth that there are tax advantages of LICs over trusts, the tax liability just gets primarily worn by the LIC rather than the individual so LICs are generally worse for super funds to the extent they retain tax-paid earnings given their higher tax rates.

Nothing wrong with either and I have both in my portfolio but to criticise one structure over the other is simply wrong and over-generalising.

Refer: https://www.firstlinks.com.au/beat-market-etfs-lics-funds-structures

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Five timeless lessons from a life in investing

Video: How Chris Cuffe finds fund managers who 'swing the bat'

Video: Noel Whittaker on investing until you’re 100

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.