Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 229

LIC update: benefits of international exposure

Australian equities rose marginally during the September quarter with the S&P/ASX 200 Accumulation Index up 0.7%. The performance for the 12 months to 30 September 2017 was a solid 9.2% driven by a good performance from large caps and strong gains in the resources sector with the S&P/ASX 200 Materials Index up 17.3% for the 12 months.

International LICs performing best

However, the best performing LICs for the 12 months to 30 September 2017 were those with an international focus reflecting the strong performance of international equity markets, with the MSCI World Index (Local) up 17.9% for this period. The top four performing LICs were PM Capital Global Opportunities Fund (ASX:PGF) up 30.4%, MFF Capital Investments (ASX:MFF) up 22.5%, PM Capital Asian Opportunities Fund (ASX:PAF) up 22.2% and Platinum Capital (ASX:PMC) up 20.7%. (IIR does not cover these four LICs and we make no recommendations in relation to these LICs.) The strong performance of these LICs over the past year, which significantly beat the returns of the Australian market, highlights the benefits to investors of a diversified portfolio with a proportion in international equities.

The best performing LIC in our coverage universe was also an international focused LIC, Global Masters Fund (ASX:GFL). GFL invests in quality international shares, but its largest exposure is to Berkshire Hathaway, at 73.8% of its portfolio. Berkshire Hathaway shares rose around 30% for the 12 months to 30 September 2017 helping drive GFL’s 18.6% growth in pre-tax NTA. The reason the pre-tax NTA growth did not match the growth in the Berkshire Hathaway share price was that GFL’s investment in Flagship Investments (ASX:FSI) achieved limited share price growth and the Australian dollar rose over the same period. GFL was also the best performing LIC in our universe over a five-year period delivering a pre-tax NTA return of 17.7% p.a., again, reflecting the strong performance of Berkshire Hathaway shares over the period. GFL has also delivered strong share price returns of 52.9% over 12 months and 28.7% p.a. over five years reflecting elimination in the discount to pre-tax NTA. Our rating for GFL is Recommended Plus, however, the shares now look expensive trading at roughly a 10% premium to pre-tax NTA.

Emerging Markets Masters Fund (ASX:EMF) also delivered a strong 12 month performance with a portfolio return (pre-tax NTA plus distributions) of 13.2%, although this was below the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, AUD return of 17.5%. This reflects EMF’s bias to sectors leveraged to what it believes are growth sectors such as consumer staples and healthcare. These sectors have not performed as well as 'value' sectors of the market over the past year. Over the past three years, this LIT has outperformed the benchmark with a return of 8.6% p.a. compared to the benchmark return of 8.1% p.a. EMF provides domestic investors with exposure to a professionally managed portfolio of emerging market funds, a unique proposition on the ASX. From a country perspective, the largest allocations are to China (26.9%) and India (16.9%). A significant portion (18.5%) is also invested in what the company refers to as Frontier Markets. The portfolio is significantly overweight India and the Frontier Markets relative to the benchmark. At 30 September 2017 EMF securities were trading at a 1% premium to pre-tax NTA, a reasonable entry point for long-term investors looking for emerging markets exposure. Our rating for EMF is Recommended Plus.

Cadence Capital (ASX:CDM) and Perpetual Investment Company (ASX:PIC) which both have blended portfolios of Australian and international equities also delivered returns above the domestic market return. CDM delivered a portfolio return of 10.3% and PIC delivered a portfolio return of 10.2%. Our rating for CDM is Recommended Plus and PIC is Recommended. At 30 September 2017 CDM was trading at a 12.3% premium to pre-tax NTA while PIC looked reasonable value at a 4.7% discount.

Australian large cap LICs underperform over 12 months 

The five largest Australian large-cap focused LICs delivered an average portfolio return of 8.0% for the 12 months to 30 September, below the S&P/ASX 200 Accumulation Index return of 9.2%. This largely reflects underweight positions in resources, a sector which has performed well over the last 12 months. Over a five-year period these same LICs have delivered an average portfolio return of 9.1% p.a. versus the market benchmark return of 10.1% p.a.

Over the longer-term we would expect these LICs to perform broadly in line with the market. At 30 September 2017 Australian Foundation Investment Company (ASX:AFI) and Milton Corporation were trading at slight premiums to pre-tax NTA and Australian United Investment Company (ASX:AUI) was at a slight discount. All look reasonable value for long-term investors looking for exposure to a diversified portfolio of Australian large-cap shares. Our rating for AFI and MLT is Highly Recommended and our rating for AUI is Recommended Plus. Diversified United Investment (ASX:DUI) was the best performing large-cap focused LIC over the 12 months to 30 September 2017 beating the market with a portfolio return of 13.5%. Its five-year return of 11.2% p.a. also beat the market benchmark return of 10.1% p.a. At 30 September DUI was trading at a 3.3% discount to pre-tax NTA, a good entry point for investors looking for exposure to a diversified portfolio of Australian large-caps shares. We note that DUI also has a small exposure to international shares and also Australian small caps. Our rating for DUI is Recommended.

Whitefield (ASX:WHF) was the best performing Australian large-cap focused LIC on a five-year basis. Whitefield primarily invests in Australian industrial shares meaning that it does not have exposure to the volatile resources sector. Whilst WHF underperformed the industrials benchmark over the past 12 months, its five-year return of 12.9% p.a. was slightly better than the 12.7% p.a. return from the S&P/ASX 200 Industrials Accumulation Index. At a 6.8% discount to pre-tax NTA at 30 September, WHF’s shares represent good value for investors looking for exposure to Australian industrial shares. Our rating for WHF is Recommended Plus.

 

Peter Rae is Supervisory Analyst at Independent Investment Research. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

11 Comments
Carlos
March 29, 2019

makes no sense to me that you don't cover MFF,
which not only is one of the largest global LICs ,with a market cap well over 1 Billion, and also has been by far and away the best outperformer, with returns of 20% per annum over the past 10 years ( as of end of Feb 2019 ) !! (Editor's note: the article does cover MFF).

Graeme
December 02, 2017

Following on from Alex's comment, I would be interested in general on what criteria IIR apply when choosing which LICs to cover. It does seem rather random.

Alex
November 30, 2017

Nice article Peter.

May I ask, why don't you cover MFF or PGF ?

carikku
November 30, 2017

If it was a product push, there would have been some mention of how Argo Investments (ASX:ARG), the LIC on whose board Chris Cuffe sits, outperformed.

Note: PM Capital Global Opportunities Fund is ASX:PGF not PFG as stated. That is Prime Financial Group. Just in case anyone is looking at buying (am proud shareholder).

Ian A
November 30, 2017

Peter Rae,

Keep up the great work. There are many SMSFs and personal investors in LICs who find the information very useful.

john
November 29, 2017

SMSF Trustee, the title of the article is clearly in relation to LIC's, with the article then talking about how LIC's with international exposure performed well. I, for one, get a lot of value from Cuffelinks LIC reports. A bit unusual that you took this article as a "product push". It's clearly nothing of the sort. And by the way, its silly to think that LIC's are a waste of time simply because they contain companies that one can invest in on their own. LIC offer the benefit of a managed fund, whilst often not carrying the high fees that usually accompany such funds. There is a reason why LIC's have become more and more popular in recent times.

Rob
November 30, 2017

Absolutely agree with everything you said, John.

SMSF Trustee
December 01, 2017

Clearly I misread the article, but my comments are also now being made to say much more than they did or were intended to say. I didn't say and don't believe LICS are a waste of time. I most certainly understand the investment case for them, but my main points are totally valid. The strong performance of global LICS is not because they're LICS but because they were invested in global markets. And you can get exposure in other ways, though I can now see how the article was intended to focus on comparing domestic and global LICS.

Can we call a truce now?

SMSF Trustee
November 28, 2017

Not at all, but the opening paragraph is about the Australian market and then the body of the article says that global LICS did better. As if it was being in LICS rather than in global that made the difference. Perhaps all that was needed was another sentence in the opening paragraph that referenced Australian market LIC returns - something not done until the end of the article.

SMSF Trustee
November 28, 2017

Hmmm, how to turn an asset class discussion into a product push. You don't have to be in LIC's to get the performance of global shares. Traditional international equity funds will also do the trick! Nothing special about LICs, they're just a vehicle that obtains the performance of the asset class in which they invest.

Graham Hand
November 28, 2017

Hmmm, SMSF Trustee. Are we not supposed to cover LICs and ETFs (of which there are $65 billion on the ASX and of interest to many of our readers) simply because exposure can also be obtained via unlisted funds? Our readers want to know about alternatives, it's not a product push.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Five famous investors with cheap listed funds

The merits of investing in LICs at a discount

LIC reporting season wrap for 2017

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Who's next? Discounts on LICs force managers to pivot

The boards and managers of six high-profile LICs, frustrated by their shares trading at large discounts to asset value, have embarked on radical strategies to fix the problems. Will they work?

Four simple things to do right now

Markets have recovered in the last six months but most investors remain nervous about the economic outlook. Morningstar analysts provide four quick tips on how to navigate this uncertainty.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 374

Suddenly, it's the middle of September and we don't hear much about 'snap back' anymore. Now we have 'wind backs' and 'road maps'. Six months ago, I was flying back from Antarctica after two weeks aboard the ill-fated Greg Mortimer cruise ship, and then the world changed. So it's time to take your temperature again. Our survey checks your reaction to recent policies and your COVID-19 responses.

  • 9 September 2020

Reporting season winners and losers in listed property trusts

Many property trust results are better than expected, with the A-REIT sector on a dividend yield of 4.8%. But there's a wide variation by sector and the ability of tenants to pay the rent.

Have stock markets become a giant Ponzi scheme?

A global financial casino has been created where investors ignore realistic valuations in the low growth, high-risk environment. At some point, analysis of fundamental value will be rewarded.

Every SMSF trustee should have an Enduring Power of Attorney

COVID-19 and the events of 2020 show why, more than ever, SMSF trustees need to prepare for the ‘unexpected’ by having an Enduring Power of Attorney in place. A Power of Attorney is not enough.

Latest Updates

Weekly Editorial

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 376

The US tech index, the NASDAQ, peaked on 2 September 2020 at 12,058 and three weeks later closed at 10,632. On the same days, Apple hit US$137.98 and then fell to US$107.12. These falls of over 10% and 20% seem high but both were simply returning to their early August levels. It's hardly a rout when a month's gains are given back. The bigger issue is whether such stock corrections will scare off the retail 'Robinhood' traders.

  • 24 September 2020
  • 2
Interviews

Interview on new technologies with more potential to grow

For many global tech companies, COVID has boosted their revenues and pushed share prices to all-time highs. We are on the cusp of amazing technical advances and there are plenty of new opportunities.

Shares

Five reasons why Tesla is the everything bubble

As fewer professionals actively research the merits of a company’s prospects, stocks become disproportionately driven by capital flows. Prices disconnect from fundamentals and there's no better example than Tesla.

Retirement

Three retirement checks for when you have enough

Not every retiree needs to gun for higher returns, but a conservative portfolio can court its own risks, especially with bond rates so low. But some retirees prefer to settle for a lower income.

Shares

Hide and seek: the FX impact on global equity investments

As more Australians tilt their investments to global equities, they often overlook the exchange rate risk and fees. The move from US57 cents to US73 cents in six months shows the unhedged impact.

Economy

When America sneezes, the world catches a ...

The recovery from COVID-19 is looking more like a K-shape, with some companies doing well while others struggle. The pandemic seems more akin to a black swan, exogenous shock than a structural downturn.

Retirement

How the age pension helps retirees cope with losses

It's often overlooked how wealthier couples can fall back on the age pension if a market loss hits their portfolio. The reassurance is never greater than in a financial (and now epidemic) crisis.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2020 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use.
Any general advice or class service prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, has been prepared by without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. Refer to our Financial Services Guide (FSG) for more information. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.