Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 257

The merits of investing in LICs at a discount

  •   6 June 2018
  • 1
  •      
  •   

There are many factors that help explain why Listed Investment Companies (LICs) and Listed Investment Trusts (LITs) share prices diverge from pre-tax Net Tangible Asset (NTA) values. These include, but are not limited to:

  • Portfolio performance
  • Portfolio size (many subscale LICs/LITs trade at discounts)
  • Marketing and communication efforts by the manager
  • Investor preferences
  • Overall share market sentiment
  • Relative interest rate and yield differentials with competing investment opportunities.

Discounts and premiums can change over time, although some LICs/LITs may always trade at a discount for a variety of reasons including ongoing underperformance and subscale issues.

In the table below we show all LICs/LITs in our coverage with a discount greater than 5% and also compare the April discount with the three-year average. There are no LITs, only LICs on the list.

LICs at Discount

LICs at Discount

There are two things that stand out from the above table.

Firstly, the LICs with the six largest discounts all have market capitalisations under $100 million. In our view, it is difficult for small scale LICs to generate the same level of interest as larger LICs and they are likely to have poor market liquidity.

Secondly, four of the LICs have options on issue. Unexercised options can be a drag on LIC share prices until after the options are exercised. Options may be dilutive, as there is the possibility they may be exercised at a price lower than NTA. Before investing in LICs with outstanding options it is a good idea to calculate the diluted NTA.

Here are some explanations why specific LICs are trading at a discount.

Bailador Technology Investments (ASX:BTI) is trading at the largest discount to NTA, a material 25.2%. We believe a number of initial investors in the LIC have lost patience given a couple of major writedowns in individual portfolio holdings and the long lead time for realisations on individual investments. Private equity style investing requires patience and cashflows can be lumpy. Investors also need to understand that, in a portfolio of 10 private equity investments, it is not unusual for one or two investments to not perform to initial expectations. BTI continues to expect a number of realisations over the next 12 months with the potential to substantially increase NTA. The shares look cheap, but the discount may take some time to correct with the market waiting for further evidence of the realisations.

Barrack St Investments (ASX:BST), Flagship Investments (ASX:FSI) and Glennon Capital (ASX:GC1) are all examples of LICs that we consider subscale. BST and GC1 have both been in existence for relatively short periods. We expect the discounts to remain in place until these LICs can establish a consistent track record. FSI has a longer track record and the portfolio has performed relatively well. We highlighted FSI in our April LMI Monthly and noted that whilst liquidity is restricted, increased marketing and communications might help with elimination of the discount over time.

We currently see Contango Global Growth (ASX:CQG), trading at a 10% discount to options diluted pre-tax NTA, as a good opportunity for investors looking for international exposure. We also see URB Investments (ASX:URB), at an 11.1% discount to pre-tax NTA, as a good opportunity to invest in the urban renewal theme. We believe the market is not valuing the upside in some of the LIC’s direct property assets. Refer to our March 2018 LMI Monthly Update for more details on URB.

Amongst the larger cap LICs in the table, three stand out in particular, Whitefield (ASX:WHF), AMCIL (ASX:AMH) and Diversified United Investment (ASX:DUI). All are trading at discounts to pre-tax NTA, yet they are the top three performing LICs (with an Australian large cap focus) over the past five years (per the above performance table). All except WHF, which has slightly underperformed, have exceeded their portfolio benchmarks over the five-year period. We note that all three LICs have historically traded at discounts, but the discounts are currently above their three-year averages.

WAM Leaders (ASX:WLE) also stands out at a 5.1% discount to pre-tax NTA. Interestingly, it is the only Wilson Asset Management Fund to trade at a discount to pre-tax NTA. WLE has only been around for two years and is yet to establish a track record but, based on the Managers data, the underlying portfolio has performed well since inception generating outperformance of 2.6% p.a. before expenses, fees and taxes. However, on a pre-tax NTA basis WLE has underperformed the S&P/ASX 200 Accumulation Index with performance impacted by the exercise of options in 2017. If WLE can build a sustained track record of outperformance (although for a large-cap fund this is likely to be harder to achieve) then perhaps its shares could at some stage also trade at a premium to pre-tax NTA.

Important: Please note that our commentary above is based on pre-tax NTA and market prices at 30 April 2018. Discounts will change on a daily basis with share price movements and movements in NTA.

 

Peter Rae is Supervisory Analyst at Independent Investment Research. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

 

  •   6 June 2018
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Why LIC discount harvesting is a buy-and-hold decision

LIC reporting season wrap for 2017

LIC discounts widening with the market sell-off

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.