Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 558

The power of dividends

A business is worth the cash an owner can get from it, and there are two ways to get that cash: through the mail or through a sale. Collect a dividend payment, or sell the ownership or assets of the company.

Over the life cycle of a business, investors who might someday sell its stock must guess what others might pay for it. An early investor might dream of the company’s addressable market, but they must look to the second investor, who may speculate about its sales. The second investor must think of the third, who may predict its path to profits. And that investor must consider the next one, who may estimate earnings or forecast free cash flow.

We love looking at free cash flow. Yet cash does little good if it is stashed or squandered, and if you don’t control the business, you can’t sell it outright, you can’t sell its assets, and you can’t set its payout policy.

But if you owned the whole thing, you could always demand dividends.

It is the perspective of this owner—no matter how hypothetical or far in the future they may be—that determines the intrinsic value of the business. No matter how many times the shares of a company change hands, its eventual potential to pay dividends is what ultimately determines its worth.

Dividends provide insights into a company

Dividends tell you something about a business. If it pays out, it is probably profitable, but looking at earnings or cash flow could tell you that. Dividends also tell you that its lenders haven’t pressed to prevent cash from leaving the building, and that its leaders care enough about minority shareholders to reward them.

So as minority shareholders, while we love looking at free cash flow, we like looking at dividends too. Historically, that’s often been a rewarding approach. In the US, Europe, and Japan, shares with high dividend yields have outperformed their wider stock markets over the very long term.

Like any lone metric, a company’s dividend is understood best if you deeply understand the business. An exceptionally high yield (dividend per share divided by share price) may presage a dividend cut—this is partly why stocks with pretty high yields have (on average) outperformed those with the very highest yields. High payouts might also tell you that a company can’t find enough attractive projects to invest in, limiting its growth.

Alternatives to dividends

Growth is a competing use for cash, and if a company can reinvest in projects with attractive returns on capital, they usually should. Companies can also repurchase their own shares—buybacks have long eclipsed dividends as the preferred way to return cash to shareholders in the US, helped by tax efficiencies.

Some buybacks are better than others, however. When a company buys their own shares at a deep discount to intrinsic value, as XPO Logistics memorably did following a shoddy short-seller attack in 2018, buybacks can create enormous value. For companies like the many in Japan trading for less than 1x book value, exchanging one dollar of cash for more than one dollar of book value mechanically boosts book value per share and almost-as-assuredly lifts returns on equity. For any company, buybacks may make sense if the return on capital already employed looks better than the return on new projects. But companies can also overpay for their own shares, and buybacks provide a tempting way for executives to hit per-share bonus targets or distract from share-based compensation to their colleagues.

Dividends are simpler, and they have much to recommend them. They tend to grow more quickly than inflation, which helps to protect real returns. Many companies treat dividends as sacrosanct, so dividends can persist through profit wobbles, and high yields are hard for investors to ignore. A stock trading at 10x earnings may drop to 5x with little fanfare, but if a stock yielding 5% halves in price, its 10% yield will attract lots of curious eyes.

Put those traits together, and shares with high yields can reduce both return and forecast risk. On the return side, high-yielding companies in the US, Japan, and Europe have historically suffered shallower drawdowns and less volatility than wider stock markets. On the forecasting side, dividends are often the most predictable part of a company’s expected return. That is important, as growth forecasts for many years into the future can be off by an inch or a mile.

Dividend payers in our portfolio

Recently, we’ve found many compelling ideas with high dividend yields, and every portfolio of ours currently has a higher yield than its benchmark. Not that every holding pays a dividend—many don’t, and for most of those we support the company’s decision to reinvest instead. Some companies pay out a little but can and should pay more.

Yet over a dozen of our holdings offer dividend yields above 5%, with payouts we believe are sustainable. Some pay out cash through both dividends and buybacks, pushing their “all-in” yields to 10% or higher. These are generally mature companies that have managed to grow by at least 5% per annum over many years. Which begs a question: If you can underwrite 15% expected returns with pedestrian assumptions, why bet on predictions for 15 years in the future?

 

Eric Marais is an Investment Specialist at Orbis Investments, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This report contains general information only and not personal financial or investment advice. It does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation or individual needs of any particular person.

For more articles and papers from Orbis, please click here.

 

  •   1 May 2024
  • 11
  •      
  •   
11 Comments
Ray N
May 03, 2024

Thanks gor the article. Would have been good to have some stock examples in the portfolio though can understand the sensivities around that

Max Z
May 03, 2024

Enjoyed reading your article Eric as it all makes sense and is a cautious way of Investing without compromising Returns.

I'm all for investing in Dividend Growth Stocks. One thing your article overlooked was the Benefits of Franking Credits attached to Australian Shares that pay Dividends. I see Franking Credits as the "low hanging fruit "that enhances overall Returns. Why leave Franking Credits locked up in a Company which have no value to them?
It dosen't make sense to do that, so best to distribute them to Shareholders who can benefit from them.

WhyAsk
May 05, 2024

I believe franking credit is the non-sense of the Australia and it is the important to remove it completely. Obviously, it will not change your personal dividend as institution like banks will then issue higher dividend before paying tax which means it will gather more international participation as currently overseas citizen don't get franking benefit because it is Australia only thing and once removed there will be more participation from international market which immediately gives growth to many stocks like banks in particular in my opinion. Obviously it will stabilise over time but allowing more player in the market is always good.

Franking system is just a hype created by thinking you don't pay tax on it but in reality you do pay tax on every penny if your personal tax rate is above 30%.

Alex
May 05, 2024

WhyAsk, your comments make very little sense from both technical and language perspectives. What do you mean by "institution like banks will then issue higher dividend BEFORE paying tax......" - you do realise that dividends are paid from AFTER tax profits, don't you?

Also, you might want to research further before commenting on tax treatments - overseas investors don't get to claim franking credits offset, but they are exempt from WHT that otherwise would apply if the dividends are unfranked. Also, if you bother researching the % ownership of many major ASX companies, you'd see straight away there are plenty of foreign investors holding a sizeable ownership in Australian companies.

Franking system is not just a hype - it is intended to eliminate double taxation on the same amount of profits, instead of merely "making you thinking that you don't pay tax on it". Also, technically you have to pay tax on every penny you earn regardless whichever tax bracket you fall into, so your statement that "you do pay tax on every penny if your personal tax rate is ABOVE 30%" is inaccurate.

Dudley
May 05, 2024

"franking credit" ... "remove it completely":

There are many dividend recipients whose marginal, or average, tax rate is less than 30% who benefit by company tax being imputed to them.

. = 0% for superannuation disbursement ('pension') account earnings.
. = 0% for superannuation disbursement recipients.
. 10% and 15% for superannuation accumulation account earnings.
. <=16% for individuals with taxable income less than $45,000 / y.

Just as there are many wage recipients whose marginal, or average, tax rate is less than 30% who benefit by wage tax being imputed to them.

Both groups would be worse off if taxed 30% and the tax was not credited to them.
They would pay tax twice on the same income.

"banks will then issue higher dividend before paying tax":

Only if company tax was 'removed completely'.

Then non-resident shareholders would pay no tax on dividends, but residents would.

Then better to be a non-resident.

WhyAsk
May 06, 2024

Alex

My previous comment might have been unclear. Here's a simpler explanation:

Current System: Companies pay tax on profits, then distribute dividends. Shareholders receive franking credits to offset some of the tax already paid.

Proposed Change: Companies pay dividends directly, then shareholders pay tax on that income.

Benefits of Change:

Removes potential for double taxation (if implemented correctly).
Simplifies the system.

Concerns Addressed:

Withholding Tax (WHT): WHT on foreign investors could be implemented, similar to the US model. This shouldn't deter local investors if it attracts more international investment.


Impact on LICs:

LICs may struggle to maintain their "fully franked" advantage, but low-fee ETFs could provide a more competitive alternative.

Overall:

Revising the franking credit system could be positive, but careful planning and additional reforms are necessary to ensure a smooth transition.

Dudley
May 06, 2024

"Proposed Change: Companies pay dividends directly, then shareholders pay tax on that income.":

Can be difficult to get shareholders or wage earners to pay tax owed (especially non-residents). They might have spent it and made no provision, or just won't.

Therefore, withholding tax is levied at the source of the income: company (company tax) or employer (employee income tax).

Then ATO has less trouble collecting tax.

WhyAsk
May 07, 2024

Dudley

I am not sure if you do invest in US market or not but in US they withhold 15% of dividend income at source so basically broker will pay you 85% of the income earned. Similarly, broker will collect 15% and pay it to ATO and only pass on 85% of income to the shareholder. This is only for those who are not Australian resident for tax purpose.

This system working for decades in US so no reason to think it won't work in Australia.

Dudley
May 07, 2024

"withhold 15% of dividend income at source":

USA / Aus tax treaty.

Withholding company tax already done in Aus.
Aus company tax withholding rate = 25%, 30%.

A reason for it not being 100% is that 100% would reduce cashflow and economic activity.
With imputation of company tax to resident shareholders, the withholding rate is irrelevant to the net tax paid - just relevant to when.

30% withholding rate is a close-ish approximation to most taxpayer's marginal rate:
https://freeimage.host/i/marginal-tax-rate-67-plus.J1zLbJj

For wage earners, more care is taken to try to neither under nor over tax each wage payment because their wages are more likely to be the most significant part of their income, which is more likely to be highly predictable. 100% wage withholding tax would quickly see hunger riots, whereas shareholders have can realise cash through share sales.

Dudley
May 07, 2024

'Unlike franking credits and TFN credits, foreign tax credits/foreign income tax offsets are not refundable.':

https://support.class.com.au/hc/en-au/articles/360001519715-Why-is-my-foreign-dividend-withholding-rate-30-when-standard-withholding-rate-is-only-15

10% or 15% USA withholding tax is not refunded to Aus taxpayers with a lesser tax rate; eg super disbursement accounts.

Steve
May 10, 2024

WhyAsk, so it sounds like you are advocating the trust model of taxation for dividends. What happens if companies decide to reinvest earnings rather than pay dividends. If the trust model was adopted, companies would be forced to pay top marginal rate of tax on undistributed profits. Such an outcome will only serve to push companies into more tax friendly jurisdictions not to mention the strong resistance from the shareholder lobby groups. Interestingly, during the last period of major tax reform in 1999, the Howard Government played around with the idea of taxing trusts like companies as opposed to taxing companies like trusts.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

The best strategy to build income for life

Why the ASX 200 has gone nowhere in 16 years

The familiar story on dividends, plus predictions for 2023

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

High quality businesses are on sale

Beneath the dominance of the ASX's largest stocks, much of the market has been left behind. High-quality companies are now trading at levels rarely seen, offering opportunities for investors willing to look deeper.

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

The strange effect of the 30% minimum capital gains tax

The 30% minimum tax on capital gains sits at the heart of the budget's proposed reforms. Yet the mechanics reveal anomalies that introduce unexpected distortions that raise questions about its design.

Ranking three common retirement strategies

The defining challenge of retirement isn't just about building wealth, it's about converting your lifetime savings into sustainable income. A holistic understanding of different strategies can improve long-term outcomes.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 667 with weekend update

The downfall of the giant and three lessons for investors.

  • 18 June 2026

Latest Updates

Planning

Does your will qualify for the discretionary testamentary trust exemption?

Treasury has confirmed the exemption many families were hoping for. But buried in the fine print are two conditions that could leave some wills on the wrong side of the exemption, despite years of careful planning.

Lithium's latest drop and what it means for ASX investors

Lithium's latest sell-off has punished ASX miners as prices remain hostage to shifting expectations. The key challenge is navigating a market prone to extreme volatility despite a strong case for the long-term demand outlook.

Investment strategies

CGT reform and fund turnover: who really feels the impact?

The implications of CGT reform are far and wide. As the 50% discount gives way to inflation indexation, turnover and return profiles may become critical drivers of after-tax performance. Some strategies face a far greater hit.

Superannuation

Super was built for a very different Australia

Our retirement system was built around assumptions that no longer hold. Lower homeownership, longer lifespans and changing expectations are exposing cracks that policymakers and super funds need to address.

Retirement

Retirement in reality - 4 months in

Many people spend years planning financially for retirement but little time preparing for what comes next. Four months in, here are the surprising lessons I've learnt on finding purpose, social connection and healthy habits.

Investment strategies

After the Budget, Australia needs its own definition of quality

As tax reforms reshape investment incentives, investors should rethink what quality investing means in the uniquely concentrated Australian market, where traditional frameworks may not translate as effectively.

Datacenters are the new shale oil

Why are tech giants pouring billions into datacentres when the economics look questionable? The most dangerous words in investing may be: "everyone else is doing it". Today's AI boom has striking parallels with the shale bust.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.