Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 443

10 lessons from Larry Fink's 2022 Outlook

Asset manager BlackRock recently held a 2022 Outlook event. Here are some edited highlights of what its CEO, Larry Fink, said about 10 topics.

1. Consumer behaviour has completely changed

“We saw a vast change [in 2021]. Because of what we're witnessing now with the new variant, we're spending much less money on services. We're not commuting as much. We're not going to restaurants as much. And the pool of savings has built up dramatically, but when we spend it we're spending it much more on capital goods. Some of the fundamental reasons why we have supply chain problems is the demand side is just so much greater than it's ever been.”

2. Inflation is not transitory

“Inflation is a big, big issue going into 2022 because of this change in consumerism. And we see it in wages too. We have the largest quit rate [leaving jobs] in the United States we've ever had, which is a great statement of the confidence of the worker. People…quit because they have confidence they could find something better and easier. That in itself is now stimulating more wage inflation. So the question is: are we going to have more wage inflation, or more core inflation? That’s going to be a big issue politically.”

3. ‘Sustainability inflation’ is a thing

“We are a big believer in the world moving faster and in a decarbonised way. But if we don't have proper government policies to navigate the demand side of energy versus its supply, we're going to have big imbalances. That’s what we experienced late last year, where there was so much pressure and supply mitigation of hydrocarbons, without any negation of demand. I believe this is going to be with us for some time. I could almost call it sustainability inflation. In 2022 this will be a backdrop that will lead to changes in the behaviour of central banks, especially the Federal Reserve.”

4. Equity investors shouldn't expect bumper returns

“The S&P was up 27% last year. It would be very hard for me to see those type of outcomes [again].

There's no question some valuations are very extreme. And there's so much momentum in the equity markets. Our clients are aggressively investing in more and more privates, whether it's private debt, private equity, or real estate. So we are seeing real changes in investor behaviour worldwide. But it should create less fear of higher inflation. So that’s why I’m not fearful of equities. I am a big believer of owning equities in 2022. Likewise, I’m a big believer that you can find opportunities in fixed income even with rising rates. So I am not that worried about global capital markets. The pool of money sitting on the sidelines is enormous. That’s probably the biggest question I’m being asked: ‘Where do I put my money?’ not ‘How do I protect my money?’”

5. Technology boosts resilience ...

“I don't believe remote working can create culture. There is a great need for interconnectedness with your team and with your organisation. Having the banter of a conversation about an economy, or having a political debate over dinner is far more expansive than doing it on a virtual call. We have to be mindful that human connectivity is the essence of so much of the culture of an organisation. I truly believe culture is the number one difference between a bad company and a good company, or a good company and a great company.”

6. ... but watch for mental health issues

“I feel bad about the young people who have joined with our organisations and spent so little time in the office. I don’t know how they are going to grow out of their vertical. Virtually and independently, it is hard to move people to different parts of organisations (…) and bringing back the essence of an organisation in person is going to be vital. There is so much evidence of growing mental health issues, loneliness is growing, despite how well everything is going in evidence by corporate profits. But it doesn’t mean it’s perfect, it doesn’t mean it’s lasting. It means we’re resilient, and I don’t think it’s lasting.”

7. The private sector can't be the environmental police

“The issue around climate and climate risk is going to be the biggest change in capital markets. At the same time, politicians have two, four, six-year terms to effectuate a proper policy, and we’re talking 20-30 years. Therein lies the imbalance we’re facing. Right now, governments are asking the private sector to do more because they are incapable of doing as much as they would like to. The risk is, we cannot be the environmental police on behalf of governments, so there is a delicate balance there. We are all going to have to be astute in terms of navigating our portfolios, and some industries that are going to be left behind if they are not adapting. I believe the opportunity of finding those new technologies to rapidly create a decarbonised world is going to be fascinating and it’s going to create huge sums of profits for those who discover those firms and technologies.”

8. We should decarbonise slowly

“Right now, we do not have enough technology to decarbonise in a fair, just way. If we want to decarbonise tomorrow, we probably could do it, but it would create hyperinflation, it would create more inequalities. We have to go from all these different granular shades as we move to green, and we’re going to create and find those technologies to accelerate this pathway. But all the money we manage is not ours. Our job is to inform and educate our clients – how should they be thinking about decarbonisation in a world that needs hydrocarbons, and how do you manage that transition?”

9. Hydrocarbon companies will become leaders

“Some of the best meetings I had in 2021 were with hydrocarbon companies. They are going to be the leader in the transition, and we are going to have some nascent new companies that are going to become leaders too. Just like what we may be seeing in EV, you had Tesla as the innovator but within time you had GM, Ford, Volkswagen, Toyota rapidly create an acceleration in this pathway.”

10. Stakeholder capitalism is not political

“There is no question in our evidence of research that the companies who focus the most on their stakeholders have more resilient, more durable long-term profitability. And let me just say one thing to everybody, stakeholder capitalism is not political. Stakeholder capitalism is the essence of what drives a company. It is a culture of an organisation moving forward, building connectivity with their clients, their employees and their communities, and these are the companies that you want to invest in.”

 

Ollie Smith is an Editor and Sunniva Kolostyak is a Data Journalist at Morningstar UK. This article does not consider the circumstances of any investor. Minor changes have been made to the original version for an Australian audience.

Access data and research on over 40,000 securities through Morningstar Investor, as well as a portfolio manager integrated with Australia’s leading portfolio tracking service, Sharesight. Sign up to a free, four week trial below:


Try Morningstar Investor for free


 

  •   26 January 2022
  • 5
  •      
  •   
5 Comments
George
January 26, 2022

Always cute hearing from a billionaire about connection to communities. Is this a new term, 'stakeholder capitalism'? Beyond a few companies with CEOs who give their companies a different culture, the number one stakeholder is the shareholder and the other stakeholders are to be tolerated but their interests never come first at the expense of profit.

Trevor G
January 26, 2022

“ But if we don't have proper government policies to navigate the demand side of energy versus its supply, we're going to have big imbalances. “

I wonder what policies he has in mind?

Jan
January 27, 2022

MOST of the emphasis on "decarbonization" appears to centred around coal, while we are still burning 100 million barrels of oil a day. We have 2 totally opposed concepts driving the world, Maintaining Growth ( increasing consumption) and real concern about Global Warming.
For the world to survive, it strikes me you cant have both.
As a insane example are the massive supplements promoting Travel in all the weekend newspapers.
The World needs to learn to live with "less" and for a start dramatically reducing arms manufacturing

Ramon Vasquez
January 29, 2022

Dead ON ! Half the stuff we are supposed to need is actual garbage stuff ! Ramon .

Michael2
January 30, 2022

Good to read some discussion about reducing the demand side of fossil fuel use. Very concerned about the companies who have led us to the edge of the abyss, knowing full well a problem was developing, lobbying governments and using political donations etc to keep on doing what they are doing i.e. the hydrocarbon companies and big polluters, are now the ones who will ‘lead’ the way out of trouble. Can they be trusted after such an egregious abuse of trust?

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Why ESG can still play a crucial role in investor portfolios

Mike Murray on watching for the changing narrative

It's time to assess your super fund’s carbon footprint

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.