Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 270

Strategies for avoiding the super 'death duty'

Whenever I make a speech to retirees, I talk about the death tax of 15% (or 17% when it includes the Medicare levy), which can apply to superannuation death benefits. Most people have never heard of it, and believe that Australia doesn’t have death duties.

Well, I guess it is not, strictly speaking, a 'death duty', but the effect is the same. So take the time to get your head around it, as it’s an easy tax to minimise with a bit of planning.

Value of a re-contribution strategy

The first thing to understand is that it applies only to the taxable portion of your superannuation fund that is given to a non-dependant. A spouse is always a dependant whether they have a separate income or not.

It does not apply to the tax-free portion of your super, so those over 60 and still eligible to contribute to super could take advice about adopting a withdrawal and re-contribution strategy. This involves taking out a chunk of your super tax-free, and then contributing it back as a non-concessional contribution.

There is no cost involved, as there is no entry tax on these contributions, and it effectively converts the amount re-contributed into a tax-free component. But watch the contribution limits as there are big penalties for exceeding the caps.

The next thing to understand is that you cannot elect to withdraw just from the taxable component. If your balance is partly taxable and partly non-taxable, the components of the withdrawal will be in the same ratio as your existing balance.

Taxable components of a tax-free fund

Many retirees are in pension phase, which means the earnings on their fund are tax-free, as are the withdrawals if they are aged 60 or over and eligible to withdraw. However, the tax-free status of the fund does not mean that all the components become tax-free as well. There will almost certainly still be taxable and non-taxable portions of the components, with the death tax applying to the taxable component when paid to a non-dependant.

One reader asked if the death tax could be avoided by leaving the money to a charity. There is no joy here, as a charity is treated in the same way as a non-dependant. A much better option for anybody who wants to leave money to charity would be to withdraw it from superannuation before they die, make an immediate donation and claim a tax deduction.

However, if you are receiving Centrelink benefits, take advice before doing this, because the gift could be regarded as a deprived asset if it is over $10,000.

Strategies for avoiding death taxes

So, if the tax does apply, how is it calculated? It is a maximum of 17%, not a flat 17%, and is deducted by your superannuation fund before paying your beneficiary the death benefit. The tax paid is recorded on a PAYG payment summary (similar to wages). When your beneficiary lodges their personal tax return, the assessable amount received and PAYG withheld must be reported. If they have a high income, or if the sum is large, the tax is rebated so that no more than 17% is payable. If they have a low income, they may receive a refund of the tax paid by your super fund.

If you are considering a binding nomination, make sure you clearly understand the implications before setting it up. Once a valid binding nomination is in place, the trustee may lose the discretion to distribute the proceeds of the deceased’s superannuation fund in the most tax-effective manner.

The simplest way to avoid the death tax is to make sure you have given a trusted person an enduring power of attorney, with instructions to withdraw your superannuation in full if it appears that death is imminent. There would be no tax on the withdrawal, and the money could then be distributed in accordance with the terms of your will after your death.

 

Noel Whittaker is a leading financial adviser and the author of Making Money Made Simple and numerous other books on personal finance. Noel writes an excellent monthly newsletter and a free subscription is available on this link

10 Comments
Barbara Ryan
August 29, 2021

DUE to re-contribution strategy all but $1000 is tax free component in our SMSF. Is the amount of money earned by the superfund and therefore its increase in value then considered a taxable component?

Kate
September 11, 2018

Well written as always, Noel! Definitely something not many people are aware of and agree with the need for an enduring Power of Attorney.

You mentioned 'there are no costs involved' with the re-contributions strategy. True there are no taxes, however there could be costs in the form of CGT, buy/sell spreads and/or transaction fees.

Jason
September 11, 2018

Well done on raising awareness of this Noel. It has received next to no air time to date and is going to be a huge and unnecessary expense for many families simply because they don't know about it or what to do about it.

You're one of the good guys in the financial advice world.

David
September 07, 2018

Given, as we're often told, super isn't intended to be a vehicle for intergenerational wealth transfer, what's fundamentally wrong with paying some tax upon the death of the member?

Seems to me all the younger generations complaining about the inequity of the financial system generally should fully support some of that inequitably-acquired wealth flowing back into government coffers to fund schools and hospitals and teachers and nurses.

But wait, it would mean they would inherit less, wouldn't it? Still, it's the moral stand to take. Tricky...

I speak as one who, alas, has no dependants, and is happy to pay tax to support the rest of society before whatever's left gets distributed to various friends and relatives via my will. I'll be dead, of course, so it doesn't matter to me.

Chris
September 08, 2018

David, as long as that's where it went, but you know, and I know, that "that just isn't going to happen", you're kidding yourself. It will go into 'general revenue' and get used to fund pet projects, it's far too tempting.

The younger generations, of which I consider myself as a Gen-X, rightfully DO complain about the inequity of the financial system because it is, and always was, about boomers. They make up the biggest portion of the voters, they are the ones who you could also argue are the most politically engaged now, seeing as the younger generations have lost faith in the politicians.

So what do you really expect when the system is set up to please the masses from whom they will get votes ? It's pork barrelling.

Personally, I'm not expecting to inherit anything because (a) my parents were not rich and (b) the "SKI" attitude of the boomers. Good riddance, as far as I'm concerned, because I will be a self-made man regardless.

SMSF Trustee
September 11, 2018

Chris, have you actually looked at any budget documents lately? Have you actually looked at what government spending goes to? There's a lot spent on schools and hospitals and teachers and nurses, to courts and legal services, for the defence of our nation, for aged care services and pensions; there's spending on roads and other infrastructure, and the list goes on. Maybe the odd "pet project", but for goodness' sake don't let your political emotions get in the way of the facts. We are very fortunate not to live in a Zimbabwe or other 'banana republic' where taxes are only spent on pet projects, so I get really annoyed when people try to make it sound like our system is broken.

And no one is a self-made man. The teachers that other people's taxes provided you had some input; the police who keep you safe were paid for by other people's taxes; the courts who ensure that an invention you might make remains your property are paid for by other people's taxes; the hospital that will treat you when you get ill is paid for by other people's taxes and/or health insurance premiums. So get off your high horse sunshine and acknowledge that we're all in this together and that our community way of life is pretty decent.

Allan
September 06, 2018

That is the silliness in the design of this tax measure. Forewarned of your impending doom with time to act equals no tax paid by beneficiaries. Expire unexpectedly and 17 percent is taken in tax.
Yet another crazy example of our make it up as they go tax system.

john
September 06, 2018

In the case of an smsf there usually would not be time if death is imminent to do the necessary arrangements

David
September 06, 2018

Thank you Noel, a simple concise explanation of the superannuation 'death tax'. (PS:- went to a talk you did about 40 years ago and still follow and take great advice from your wealth of knowledge)

Ashley
September 06, 2018

Good stuff, Noel. Looks like a lot of paper shuffling but the best part is to get an enduring POA to withdraw the money the day before you die.

 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Four ways to avoid super death benefit taxes

Most estate planning for tax is inadequate

The myth about Costello’s super generosity

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

It is hard to think of any area of widespread public concern where the same policies have been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that they have failed to achieve their objectives.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.

Property

RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.

Shares

4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.

Shares

Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.

Shares

Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.

Superannuation

Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.