Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 583

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 583 with weekend update

  •   24 October 2024
  • 5
  •      
  •   

The Weekend Edition includes a market update plus Morningstar adds links to two additional articles.

Howard Marks is well known to most readers of our newsletter but to recap: he is the Co-Chairman of Oaktree Capital, an alternative asset manager with US$193 billion in assets, and his regular memos are widely read by professional investors and average punters alike.

In his latest memo, Marks discusses his visit with clients in Australia last month and presenting his ‘sea change’ idea – that interest rates won’t go back to the lows seen over the past decade and that portfolios will need to adjust accordingly.

Marks has been pushing this thesis for a while, so there’s nothing new there. However, his presentations led to broader discussions about asset allocation, and from that he had two epiphanies on the topic.

Rethinking the two major asset classes

Marks suggests that ‘asset allocation’ is a relatively new phenomenon. No-one used the term when he joined the finance industry 55 years ago, and portfolios then generally followed a standard 60% equities, 40% bonds split. For US investors, that meant simply allocating to US stocks and bonds.

Now, investors have far more choices. In the types of assets they can invest in - debt, real assets, venture capital, private assets and so forth. In the countries that they can put money into – developed markets versus emerging, home versus abroad etc. And in the ways that they can try to increase returns - including levered strategies and putting more into ‘high beta’ assets.

What struck Marks in Australia though was that despite all the choices, there are essentially only two asset classes: ownership and debt. By this he means that if you want to participate financially in a business, the choice is between a) owning part of it, or b) making a loan to it.

You may think that these two choices are just between stocks and bonds. They’re more than that. Ownership assets can include common stocks, whole companies, real estate, private equity, and real assets, while debt can include bonds, loans mortgage backed securities, and other streams of promised payments.

Marks says ownership and lending have fundamentally different characteristics.

Owners put their money at risk with no promise of a return. They buy a piece of a business or asset and are entitled to a proportional share of any profit or cashflow made. Ownership assets typically have a higher expected return, greater upside potential, and greater downside risk.

Lenders, on the other hand, provide funds to help owners purchase or operate businesses or other assets and, in exchange, are promised periodic interest and the repayment of principle at the end. It’s a contract between borrower and lender, and the resulting return for lenders is known in advance. It’s called fixed income because it’s a fixed outcome.

All else being equal, the expected returns from debt are lower than from ownership assets but likely fall within a tighter range. There’s generally no upside on debt as you buy an 8% bond to make an 8% return. Yet, there’s also minimal downside as you’ll get the 8% return if the borrower pays, and most do pay.

Marks says that when building portfolios, investors have a choice of ownership assets and debt, and how much to allocate to each:

“Which of the two is “better”, ownership or debt? We can’t say. In a market with any degree of efficiency – that is, rationality – it’s just a tradeoff. A higher expected return with further upside potential, at the cost of greater uncertainty, volatility, and downside risk? Or a more dependable but lower expected return, entailing less upside and less downside?”

The best framework for asset allocation

The second epiphany that Marks had in Australia was about the basic characteristics of a portfolio. He says one decision matters above all else in allocating assets: the desired mix between aggression and defence or between preserving capital and growing it. Aggression is usually best played through ownership assets, while defence is better played through debt.

Marks believes that you typically can’t play offence and defence at the same time; they’re mostly mutually exclusive. "This is the fundamental, inescapable truth in investing", he says. And the choice you make between offence and defence will determine the risk profile of your portfolio.

When thought of this way, the goal of investors shouldn’t be achieving the highest return for a portfolio, Marks thinks. Instead, it should be achieving the highest risk-adjusted return, with the right mix between offence and defence to suit your wants and needs:

“For an investment program to be successful, the level of risk in the portfolio must be well compensated and fall within the desired range … neither too much nor too little.”

Concluding this second epiphany, Marks says:

“Ownership assets and debt assets should be combined to get your portfolio to the position on the risk/return continuum that’s right for you. This is the most important decision in portfolio management or asset allocation.”

Talking his own book

Marks also uses the opportunity to talk up one of his company’s preferred sectors right now: non-investment grade credit. He suggests while the returns on offer were better a year or two ago, you can still get roughly 7% on public credit and 10% on private credit. Marks thinks these returns are competitive with the historical returns of equities, but without the risks associated with owning equities. And because of their contractual nature, the returns on credit should prove more dependable than those of ownership assets.

James Gruber

In this week's edition...

In recent years, financial scams have been rife. Last year alone, there were more than 600,000 reported scams in Australia, with combined losses of $2.74 billion. A recent ruling from the The Australian Financial Complaints Authority may help to bring these numbers down, John Abernethy writes. For the first time, a bank is being forced to reimburse a customer for the amount that they were scammed.

Most of us don't want to think about death. But there is a compelling reason why we do need to plan ahead, and that's because leaving our loved ones with a mess is not how we want them to remember us. Kaye Fallick looks at some of the things you can choose to do now, financial and otherwise, to ensure those you care about will have the easiest possible journey at the time of your passing.

This week, it's a pleasure to welcome eminent financial journalist, Alan Kohler. Alan has written a new book on the property market, called The Great Divide: Australia's housing mess and how to fix it. In an extract from the book, he tells of how a succession of inquiries and reports haven't fixed housing's problems, and why we need a national consensus to improve housing affordability to ensure any genuine plan or policy can work.

The 'energy transition' is all the rage in investing circles, with good reason. It's a long-term theme that will impact a swathe of different sectors. Fidelity's Oliver Hextall says taking a 'long-term view' on the subject is a bit simplistic though and investors need to keep on top of short-term issues, especially when it comes to the supply of commodities. He looks at recent trends in graphite and lithium to amplify this point.

The 2024 Nobel Prize in Economics has been awarded to three US-based economists for their work on why nations succeed and fail. The Nobel Prize committee cited the economists' research into the advantages of democracy and the rule of law, and why they're strong in some countries and not others. John Hawkins has more.

Over the past year, can you guess which commodity has performed best? I imagine many would suggest gold, and that would be wrong. Here's the scorecard in US dollar terms: cocoa is up 82%, coffee 57%, silver 44%, followed by gold 38%. As a larger asset class, gold rightly gets more attention and today, Orbis' Eric Marais, explains why it's prudent for investors to have some exposure to gold.

The US elections are less than two weeks away, and the winner will have a big say on what happens in a host of different sectors. John DiMarco and his colleagues at Igneo Infrastructure Partners, investigate the possible implications for the global energy infrastructure industry.

Two extra articles from Morningstar this weekend. Roy van Keulen looks at an ASX stock trading at half his fair value estimate, while Greggory Warren explains Morningstar's downgrade of Berkshire Hathaway's wide moat rating.

Lastly, in this week's whitepaper, Vanguard outlines what asset allocators are currently buying and selling.

****

Weekend market update

An opening gap in US stocks on Friday was met with supply, as the S&P 500 floated back down to unchanged, snapping its six-week winning streak with a near 1% loss over the past five days, while the Nasdaq 100 managed a 0.6% advance.  Treasury yields finished higher by four basis points nearly across the board, with the two-year note finishing at 4.11% and the long bond at 4.51%. WTI crude rebounded towards US$72 and gold edged higher to US$2,745 an ounce.  Bitcoin ticked lower at $66,800 and the VIX climbed back above 20.  

From AAP Netdesk:

On Friday, the Australian share market morning gains mostly faded in afternoon trading, with the bourse snapping its two-week weekly winning streak. The benchmark S&P/ASX200 index closed just five points higher at 8,211.3 on Friday - a gain of 0.06%. The index dropped 0.87% for the week and is down 0.71% so far in October.

Four of the ASX's 11 sectors finished higher on Friday and five closed lower, with energy and materials little changed.

Tech was the biggest mover, climbing 3.3% as Wisetech Global soared 12.7%, clawing back some of its losses from its week of turmoil.

Wisetech announced after Thursday's close that co-founder and chief executive Richard White would be stepping down effective immediately amid an investigation into his conduct while transitioning to a full-time consultant role set to give him wide influence within the company.

In the heavyweight mining sector, Newmont had plunged 13.6% to a two-and-a-half-month low of $70.74, a day after the goldminer reported higher production costs. Other goldminers were higher, with Northern Star up 5.1%, Evolution adding 1.4% and West Africa Resources advancing 4.9%. Elsewhere in the sector, BHP and Rio Tinto both added 0.3%, to $42.39 and $118.08, while Fortescue dipped 0.7% to $18.99.

In the energy sector, Whitehaven Coal rose 5% to a one-week high of $6.74 after reporting that all of its coalmines delivered as planned or better in the September quarter.

In health care, ResMed had advanced 5.9% to a three-year high of $37.73 after the CPAP maker announced its first-quarter revenue was up 11% to $US1.2 billion. 

The big four banks had a mostly quiet day, with ANZ flat at $31.71, Westpac and NAB edging 0.1% higher at $32.14 and $38.95, respectively, and CBA adding 0.4% to $144.02.

From Shane Oliver, AMP:

Global share markets hit a rough patch over the last week on concerns about valuations amidst rising bond yields even though economic and earnings data was mostly okay. For the week US shares fell 1%, Eurozone shares fell 1.2% and Japanese shares fell 2.7%, but Chinese shares rose 0.8%. Reflecting the weak global lead Australian shares fell 0.9% for the week, with falls in IT, property, industrials and retail shares leading the falls. Oil prices rose but remain well down from recent highs. Metal and iron ore prices fell but gold made it to a record high on the back of falling interest rates lowering the opportunity cost of holding it. The $A fell as the $US rose.

Rising bond yields and share valuations. The past week has seen a further rise in long term bond yields as investors reduce expectations for how much central banks, notably the Fed, will cut rates and price in potentially higher US budget deficits if Trump wins the presidential election. This is potentially a threat to share markets because high price to earnings multiples mean that the risk premium shares offer over bonds (measured by the earnings yield less the 10-year bond yield) is already very narrow compared to what its been since the GFC. 

Australia lagging in getting inflation down, but it’s not as bad as the IMF is portraying. Much has been made of the recent IMF World Economic Outlook forecasts for inflation that show Australia as an outlier in having relatively high inflation next year compared to other countries, consistent with the RBA’s relative hawkishness in getting interest rates down. This partly reflects Australia’s relatively strong jobs market and more cautious approach to raising the cash rate along with strong growth in public spending which is keeping demand stronger than expected. But its not as bad as it appears. Firstly, the rise in inflation from 3% this year to 3.6% next year that the IMF is forecasting is similar to the RBA’s forecasts and reflects the ending as currently legislated of “cost of living” measures which pull headline inflation down this year and see a bounce back next year. Abstracting from this and focusing on trimmed mean underlying inflation suggests a continuing fall next year. 

Secondly, as evident in the next chart Australian inflation lagged global inflation on the way up in 2022 and so peaked a bit later so its lagging on the way down is not surprising and doesn’t suggest Australia has a chronic inflation problem compared to other countries. In fact, underlying inflation in Australia at 3.4%yoy in August is not that different to core inflation in the US at 3.3%yoy and the UK at 3.2%yoy. Finally, we expect September quarter inflation data to be released Wednesday to show a further fall in underlying inflation to 3.4%yoy from 3.9% in the June quarter and below RBA forecasts for 3.6%yoy, and to 3.2%yoy in the month of September. And price indicators in business surveys continue to point to falling inflation. Our base case remains for the RBA to start cutting in February next year, but a cut in December still can’t be ruled out if September quarter trimmed mean inflation comes in as forecast and October monthly underlying inflation shows a further leg down. Market expectations for just a 30% chance of a rate cut in December and 70% for February now look to have swung too pessimistic after being at 92% and more than 100% respectively in early September.

Curated by James Gruber and Leisa Bell

 

Latest updates

PDF version of Firstlinks Newsletter

ASX Listed Bond and Hybrid rate sheet from NAB/nabtrade

Monthly Bond and Hybrid updates from ASX

Listed Investment Company (LIC) Indicative NTA Report from Bell Potter

LIC Monthly Report from Morningstar

LIC (LMI) Monthly Review from Independent Investment Research

Plus updates and announcements on the Sponsor Noticeboard on our website

 

5 Comments
Larry Brunson
October 30, 2024

I happened to be one of the first few investors to a company that paid me my earnings but still got to scam victims over the years On my second investment with another binary options company, I got scammed badly and lost almost all my savings as at that time and not until I seek help from recoveryhacker101 @ gmail com I got a good part of my money back and it would have been worse cause I was getting close to depression. Their goal is to inform and to help you recover your lost funds from the banks and credit card providers through our extensive knowledge in fraud detection and years of experience in dealing with these matters. They have a professionally trained group of recovery agents who have worked in the financial sector and have a high success rate including many satisfied customers

Ross
October 27, 2024

About managing risk
Marks ( and everyone else) talks about managing a portfolio based on risk appetite.
Risk of what?
This is rarely defined and when it is I find it vague and non mathematical.
As a Self Managed SF retiree I need enough cash to live on.
I receive about seventy five percent of this amount from dividends and distributions from Listed Blue Chip Stocks and whole of market US and Aus ETFs. Twenty five percent ( basically the discretionary spends) I get from selling.
I see my worst (likely) risk is that I might have to double my annual sell to about 2% of my portfolio for a period of downturn. This is an acceptable tradeoff to the higher returns I receive from holding all equities ie no cash or bonds.
Am I missing something?

Dudley
October 27, 2024

"achieving the highest risk-adjusted return, with the right mix between offence and defence to suit your wants and needs":

'Minimum average net real total return per year required throughout retirement.':
https://freeimage.host/i/image.JV1zXJp

https://www.firstlinks.com.au/how-much-do-you-need-to-retire-comfortably

Steve
October 27, 2024

An excellent commentary on ownership vs debt investing. It's very simple. Do you invest in first mortgages / private debt earning 8%+ or in ownership assets priced for perfection, unlikely to achieve more than 6% pa over the next decade? More so when investing via a tax free pension fund, where growth & income merges.

charles
October 25, 2024

Epiphanies? More so, blindingly obvious I would have thought. And BTW, I hope "the repayment of principle " was just a typo.

 

Leave a Comment:

     
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The nuts and bolts of family trusts

There are well over 800,000 family trusts in Australia, controlling more than $3 trillion of assets. Here's a guide on whether a family trust may have a place in your individual investment strategy.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 581 with weekend update

A recent industry event made me realise that a 30 year old investing trend could still have serious legs. Could it eventually pose a threat to two of Australia's biggest companies?

  • 10 October 2024

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 583 with weekend update

Investing guru Howard Marks says he had two epiphanies while visiting Australia recently: the two major asset classes aren’t what you think they are, and one key decision matters above all else when building portfolios.

  • 24 October 2024

Preserving wealth through generations is hard

How have so many wealthy families through history managed to squander their fortunes? This looks at the lessons from these families and offers several solutions to making and keeping money over the long-term.

A big win for bank customers against scammers

A recent ruling from The Australian Financial Complaints Authority may herald a new era for financial scams. For the first time, a bank is being forced to reimburse a customer for the amount they were scammed.

The quirks of retirement planning with an age gap

A big age gap can make it harder to find a solution that works for both partners – financially and otherwise. Having a frank conversation about the future, and having it as early as possible, is essential.

Latest Updates

Planning

What will be your legacy?

As we get older, many of us start to think about how we’ll be remembered by those left behind. This looks at why that may not be the best strategy to ensure that you live life well and leave loved ones in good stead.

Economy

It's the cost of government, stupid

Australia's bloated government sector is every bit as responsible for our economic worries as the cost of living crisis. Grand schemes like the 'Future Made in Australia' only look set to make it worse.

SMSF strategies

A guide to valuing SMSF assets correctly

SMSF trustees are required to value all fund assets, including property, at market value when preparing the fund's financial statements each year. Here are some key tips to ensure that you get it right.

Economics

Australia is lucky the British were the first 'intruders'

British colonisation's Common Law system contributed to economic prosperity, in contrast to Latin America's lower wealth under Civil Law. It influenced capitalism's success in former British colonies, like Australia.

Economics

A significant shift in the jobs market

The expansion of the 'care sector' represents the most profound structural change to Australia's job market since the mining boom. This analyses how it's come about and the impact it will have on the economy.

Shares

Searching for value in tech stocks

Just because a stock is cheap doesn't necessarily make it good value. This uses case studies in the tech sector to help identify when stocks trading on 30x earnings may be inexpensive and when others on 10x may be value traps.

Investing

Are more informed investors prone to making poorer decisions?

Finance Professor Michael Finke recently discussed the double-edged sword of taking an interest in your investments, three predictors of panic selling, and why nurses tend to be better investors than doctors.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.