Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 203

10 things to check on your estate planning

The biggest potential impact of the new superannuation rules which will apply from 1 July 2017 is tax of 15% and 30% on the capital for repeated breaches of the new rules.

Almost all the commentary (including this) is quite technical and unfortunately, there’s no avoiding the details to achieve the best outcome.

By now, most of you know the facts. A new transfer balance cap will restrict the amount a person can transfer to a pension from the accumulation phase. The limit will initially be $1.6 million and it is not transferable to a spouse or anyone else. Many people are still talking about increasing their member balances by taking advantage of the last chance to make a non-concessional contribution of $540,000 (being three years’ contributions, covering FY17, FY18 and FY19) each before the caps drop to $100,000 each year.

Traditional super nominations may be sub optimal

Anecdotally, most people have not made superannuation nominations or they have expired. Those who have usually nominate their spouse, but this option may not be optimal now.

In Australia, there are no death taxes as such but there are situations where tax is payable after a spouse or parent dies. This could arise from a simple loss of a separate set of marginal tax rates in terms of income tax. In 2007, the tax introduced on benefits paid to adult children was another ‘back-door’ death tax.

After 1 July 2017, a transition to retirement income stream (TRIS) will no longer benefit from the zero-pension tax but will be subject to the 15% tax on income and 10% capital gains tax on realised gains on assets held for more than 12 months. The strategy to make a lump sum election to access the lump sum low rate cap of $195,000 will also no longer be available. The strategy for a person with a TRIS who has not otherwise met a full condition of release will probably, subject to their circumstances, be to commute such a pension. For those who have met a full condition of release, they should convert to an account-based pension. The current law requires them to commute and restart a new pension but Treasury has advised the law will be amended to reduce this administrative burden.

The new rules mean that if a pensioner (say Lucy) with a superannuation pension balance of $900,000 receives a death benefit pension of $800,000 from her late husband (Malcolm), Lucy would have to cash $100,000 out of super or risk incurring an excess transfer balance tax of 15% on the notional earnings (based on the general interest charge, currently 8.78% annualised) on the excess over the cap for the first breach and 30% thereafter.

One way to manage this is to have Malcolm make the pension reversionary to Lucy and review the death benefit nominations. If Malcolm’s nomination is a reversionary pension in favour of Lucy, the $100,000 will have to be taken out of the superannuation fund. However, with flexibility, the trustee of his super fund has other options.

If Malcolm is in pension phase, before his death Lucy could use an appropriately drawn Enduring Power of Attorney to commute his pension if it is not reversionary to her and restart it as a reversionary pension in favour of Lucy. She could then revert $100,000 of her pension back to accumulation (in the 15% tax environment, not the personal tax environment of up to 49%). Lucy would have 12 months before Malcolm’s pension counts towards the cap and it would not include the earnings since Malcolm’s death.

Subject to their marginal tax rates and the risk of litigation, it may be better to pay Malcolm’s death benefit to his estate or an adult child as, at that stage, we would know their marginal tax rates in that year and their need for asset protection at that time.

Child pensions are also an option if they had a child under 18 or financially dependent and under 25 or with a permanent disability. Children can get $1.6 million from each parent without breaching the new caps.

Unfortunately for people who like to keep matters as simple as possible (a good policy), the new rules require that death benefit income streams must always be kept separate.

Capital Gains Tax (CGT) relief is available to preserve the tax-free status of unrealised gains on assets supporting a pension before 1 July 2017 if they make either the (a) segregated current pension asset election or the (b) unsegregated current pension asset election. In our experience, most trustees use the unsegregated approach.

There is one last chance to fix breaches of less than $100,000 before 31 December 2017 but the CGT relief will need to be activated before 1 July 2017 so we do not recommend that people rely on this.

Checklist before 1 July 2017

  1. Ensure the estate planning consequences of a non-concessional contribution of $540,000 before 1 July 2017 are anticipated.
  2. Where there is a Power of Attorney, ensure it allows a trusted person to attend to changes to the superannuation balance if the member becomes ill before implementing advice.
  3. Split contributions to a spouse with a lower balance.
  4. Use re-contribution strategies without using ‘wash sales’ particularly where there was an intention to use anti-detriment strategies which will no longer be possible after 1 July 2017.
  5. Consider transferring assets out of superannuation if in pension phase.
  6. Make an election to get the CGT uplift on an asset-by-asset basis once the gain is known and understand any other CGT discount available for that asset.
  7. Check that pensions are properly documented as reversionary if appropriate.
  8. Review insurances within superannuation as they are often larger than the member balances and count towards the transfer balance cap. If children are over 18, it may be better to have the policy outside super.
  9. Commute TRISs if they have not met a full condition of release.
  10. Review estate planning strategies if a person and their beneficiary have a combined superannuation balance (including insurance) over $1.6 million.

Until the rules change again, that is.

 

Donal Griffin is a Principal of Legacy Law, a legal firm specialising in protecting family assets. The firm is not licensed to give financial advice so please contact him for a referral to a financial adviser or accountant who specialises in superannuation. This article does not consider any individual circumstances.

3 Comments
Donal Griffin
May 26, 2017

Hi Chris, With the greatest respect, the fact that a pension can be commuted is mentioned in paragraph 9. The rules around commutation are always subject to the rules of the particular superannuation fund. This is a summary of complex matters.

Chris Jankowski
May 26, 2017

The author of the article says:

"The new rules mean that if a pensioner (say Lucy) with a superannuation pension balance of $900,000 receives a death benefit pension of $800,000 from her late husband (Malcolm), Lucy would have to cash $100,000 out of super"...

I think the statement above is incorrect. Consequently, the methods given in the article to deal with the situation are incorrect as well.

In fact, Lucy has an option of commuting her $900,000 pension into accumulation phase. Then she can commute $800,000 back into an account based pension leaving $100,000 in accumulation phase.
With the $800,000 of the death benefit pension from her late husband she will be within the $1.6 million cap and still have $100,000 in relatively tax privileged accumulation phase.

This is actually very simple, tax effective, requires no complex legal structures or maneuvers and no penalties will be due.

It is worth pointing out that one can always commute their own pension back into accumulation phase if they so desire. The law has not changed in this regard. This is the crucial point that the author of the article missed entirely.

SMSFCoach
May 27, 2017

Chris it will not be that simple as you will need to know what portion of Lucy's pension counts towards the TBC as her original pension transfer amount may have been 600k and rose to 900k with earnings, so she could accept the whole Reversionary pension. You would not commute her whole $900k as that would disadvantage her by $300k as once back in accumulation the cap the TBC applies to a new pension. So you would nearly always only look to partially commute the survivors pension to facilitate the Reversionary pension if the cap would be exceeded. The increase value in any survivors pension after 1 July 2017 should always be left in Pension Phase as not subject to the TBC.

 

Leave a Comment:

     
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Unexpected results in our retirement income survey

Who knew? With some surprise results, the Government is on unexpected firm ground in asking people to draw on all their assets in retirement, although the comments show what feisty and informed readers we have.

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Three all-time best tables for every adviser and investor

It's a remarkable statistic. In any year since 1875, if you had invested in the Australian stock index, turned away and come back eight years later, your average return would be 120% with no negative periods.

The looming excess of housing and why prices will fall

Never stand between Australian households and an uncapped government programme with $3 billion in ‘free money’ to build or renovate their homes. But excess supply is coming with an absence of net migration.

Five stocks that have worked well in our portfolios

Picking macro trends is difficult. What may seem logical and compelling one minute may completely change a few months later. There are better rewards from focussing on identifying the best companies at good prices.

Six COVID opportunist stocks prospering in adversity

Some high-quality companies have emerged even stronger since the onset of COVID and are well placed for outperformance. We call these the ‘COVID Opportunists’ as they are now dominating their specific sectors.

Latest Updates

Retirement

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

Interviews

Sean Fenton on marching to your own investment tune

Is it more difficult to find stocks to short in a rising market? What impact has central bank dominance had over stock selection? How do you combine income and growth in a portfolio? Where are the opportunities?

Compliance

D’oh! DDO rules turn some funds into a punching bag

The Design and Distribution Obligations (DDO) come into effect in two weeks. They will change the way banks promote products, force some small funds to close to new members and push issues into the listed space.

Shares

Dividends, disruption and star performers in FY21 wrap

Company results in FY21 were generally good with some standout results from those thriving in tough conditions. We highlight the companies that delivered some of the best results and our future  expectations.

Fixed interest

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Investment strategies

Seven factors driving growth in Managed Accounts

As Managed Accounts surge through $100 billion for the first time, the line between retail, wholesale and institutional capabilities and portfolios continues to blur. Lower costs help with best interest duties.

Retirement

Reader Survey: home values in age pension asset test

Read our article on the family home in the age pension test, with the RBA Governor putting the onus on social security to address house prices and the OECD calling out wealthy pensioners. What is your view?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.