Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 625

US earnings season was almost too good to be true

  •   Anna Wu
  •   20 August 2025
  • 1
  •      
  •   

Despite tariff-driven growth concerns and inflation fears, strong results from the latest US earnings season have taken markets by surprise, with over 80% of companies on the S&P 500 beating street estimates. This has further insulated the already-upbeat risk sentiment that has driven the S&P 500 to an all-time high in July.

Coming to the end of this earnings season, what are the key themes, company highlights, and emerging warning signs?

Almost too good to be true: a record run of beats

On an index level, markets have not seen this rate of earnings beats since December 2021. As of 1 August, ~82% of S&P 500 companies had delivered positive earnings surprises. Worth noting was the blended year-on-year EPS growth exceeding 9%, which is more than triple the pre-season sell-side consensus of 2.8%.

Charts 1 & 2: Q2 2025 saw the highest earnings beat since 2021

Source: VanEck. Bloomberg Intelligence. Date as of 31 July 2025.

This almost seems too good to be true: an upbeat earnings season unfolding against the backdrop of the most aggressive US tariff policy in nearly 100 years. Three main factors have softened the initial blow of US tariff aggression:

  • A weaker US dollar has increased US exports’ margins and boosted overseas revenue (in USD terms) for US companies. 
  • Inventory frontloading ahead of the Tariff Liberation Day has provided a supply buffer for US companies to stabilise their input cost; and
  • The global AI race has kept AI-related capex growing, boosting demand for high-margin tech goods and services.

However, with most trade negotiations complete, the terminal US tariff rate (15-17%) is set to linger at a level that offers almost no relief on inflationary pressure. As the three factors mentioned above fade over the coming months, US companies could feel increasing stress. This drag is partly mitigated by the government injecting fresh growth stimulus into the US economy, particularly in strategic sectors like technology and infrastructure.

The coming months will be a balancing act between these two competing forces. Smart investors should stay close to price target revisions, as Q3 earnings are likely to reveal a more complete picture of how well US corporates are digesting tariff challenges.

AI capex translates to strong earnings growth

On a sector level, technology (97%) and communications service (92%) companies, which are closely linked to the global AI race, have delivered the highest beat percentage.

Chart 3: Tech sectors led earnings beat

Source: VanEck. Bloomberg. Data as of 31 July 2025, in AUD. ** Beat, Hit, Miss counts are relative to FFO.

Within the ‘Magnificent 7’ group, (excluding Tesla, whose shares have plunged due to significant revenue decline (~12%) and margin compression (~17%)), the tech mega caps have delivered an average positive surprise of 12.4% [1], far exceeding the other 493 names (4.8%) in the benchmark, thereby maintaining their hyper-growth trajectory.

Chart 4: Magnificent 7’s EPS outgrows the broader market

Source: Bloomberg. Mag 7 is Bloomberg Magnificent 7 Total Return Index. Date as of 31 July 2025.

Another highlight is the boost to AI-related capex projection: Alphabet (Google) has increased its AI budget to US$85 billion, up from US$75 billion. Microsoft is targeting US$80 billion. Meta is doubling its budget from FY24 to US$66-72 billion in FY25. Amazon is sticking to its US$105 billion target, and Apple, which currently lags its peers, is committing an additional US$100 billion toward US production and on-device AI initiatives. This scale of investment reflects the fierce pace of AI development and is interpreted by analysts as a structural tailwind for the broader tech sector.

From a valuation standpoint, while these companies remain richly priced, recent data shows that after the tech correction earlier this year, the gap between the Magnificent 7 and the broader market has narrowed meaningfully.

Chart 5: Magnificent 7 valuations revised closer to S&P 500

Source: Bloomberg. Mag 7 is Bloomberg Magnificent 7 Total Return Index. Data as of 31 July 2025.

Commodity-linked sectors starting to feel tariff damage

Contrasting with the success seen in the tech sectors, commodity-linked sectors (materials, utilities and energy) have seen over a third of reporting companies miss their estimates.

Companies in these sectors have limited ability to pass on tariff-driven input cost inflation, as materials and energy prices are typically determined by global spot market rates and are often subject to regulatory price ceilings.

Earnings misses punished harshly

While the June quarter earnings have generally exceeded expectations, there’s a sense of caution hidden in price reactions. As shown in the chart below, one-day share price gains following an earnings beat have ranged less than 2% relative to the broader index, whereas a single earnings miss could trigger a decline of 5–9%. This suggests that investors are disproportionately punishing earnings misses – a sign that expensive valuations at companies must be justified.

Chart 6: Earnings misses are met with outsized price declines

Source: VanEck. Bloomberg Intelligence. Date as of 31 July. Performance in USD.

Final thoughts

The second quarter of 2025 saw US tariff aggression shake up the world’s trade system. It’s too early to assess the full impact of these tariffs, but it feels unsettling. While robust corporate fundamentals, the AI boom and record foreign investment have kept this earnings season warm, a sense of caution can be seen in price reactions.

US companies could face a tougher test in the coming months as economic growth slows, flagged by the Fed and reflected in recent weaker economic data prints. While investors should welcome the AI-driven growth momentum, it is important to be selective.

 

[1] Based on blended sell side analysts estimates on Bloomberg.

 

Anna Wu is a Senior Associate, Cross-Asset Investment Research at VanEck, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This is general information only and does not take into account any person’s financial objectives, situation or needs. Any views expressed are opinions of the author at the time of writing and is not a recommendation to act.

The VanEck MSCI International Quality ETF (QUAL) tracks the MSCI World ex Australia Quality Index and invests in around 300 of the world’s highest quality companies. A hedged version of QUAL is also available for investors.

For more articles and papers from VanEck, please click here.

 

  •   20 August 2025
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Active managers: Bringing a gun to the gunfight

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

High quality businesses are on sale

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.