Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 625

US earnings season was almost too good to be true

  •   Anna Wu
  •   20 August 2025
  • 1
  •      
  •   

Despite tariff-driven growth concerns and inflation fears, strong results from the latest US earnings season have taken markets by surprise, with over 80% of companies on the S&P 500 beating street estimates. This has further insulated the already-upbeat risk sentiment that has driven the S&P 500 to an all-time high in July.

Coming to the end of this earnings season, what are the key themes, company highlights, and emerging warning signs?

Almost too good to be true: a record run of beats

On an index level, markets have not seen this rate of earnings beats since December 2021. As of 1 August, ~82% of S&P 500 companies had delivered positive earnings surprises. Worth noting was the blended year-on-year EPS growth exceeding 9%, which is more than triple the pre-season sell-side consensus of 2.8%.

Charts 1 & 2: Q2 2025 saw the highest earnings beat since 2021

Source: VanEck. Bloomberg Intelligence. Date as of 31 July 2025.

This almost seems too good to be true: an upbeat earnings season unfolding against the backdrop of the most aggressive US tariff policy in nearly 100 years. Three main factors have softened the initial blow of US tariff aggression:

  • A weaker US dollar has increased US exports’ margins and boosted overseas revenue (in USD terms) for US companies. 
  • Inventory frontloading ahead of the Tariff Liberation Day has provided a supply buffer for US companies to stabilise their input cost; and
  • The global AI race has kept AI-related capex growing, boosting demand for high-margin tech goods and services.

However, with most trade negotiations complete, the terminal US tariff rate (15-17%) is set to linger at a level that offers almost no relief on inflationary pressure. As the three factors mentioned above fade over the coming months, US companies could feel increasing stress. This drag is partly mitigated by the government injecting fresh growth stimulus into the US economy, particularly in strategic sectors like technology and infrastructure.

The coming months will be a balancing act between these two competing forces. Smart investors should stay close to price target revisions, as Q3 earnings are likely to reveal a more complete picture of how well US corporates are digesting tariff challenges.

AI capex translates to strong earnings growth

On a sector level, technology (97%) and communications service (92%) companies, which are closely linked to the global AI race, have delivered the highest beat percentage.

Chart 3: Tech sectors led earnings beat

Source: VanEck. Bloomberg. Data as of 31 July 2025, in AUD. ** Beat, Hit, Miss counts are relative to FFO.

Within the ‘Magnificent 7’ group, (excluding Tesla, whose shares have plunged due to significant revenue decline (~12%) and margin compression (~17%)), the tech mega caps have delivered an average positive surprise of 12.4% [1], far exceeding the other 493 names (4.8%) in the benchmark, thereby maintaining their hyper-growth trajectory.

Chart 4: Magnificent 7’s EPS outgrows the broader market

Source: Bloomberg. Mag 7 is Bloomberg Magnificent 7 Total Return Index. Date as of 31 July 2025.

Another highlight is the boost to AI-related capex projection: Alphabet (Google) has increased its AI budget to US$85 billion, up from US$75 billion. Microsoft is targeting US$80 billion. Meta is doubling its budget from FY24 to US$66-72 billion in FY25. Amazon is sticking to its US$105 billion target, and Apple, which currently lags its peers, is committing an additional US$100 billion toward US production and on-device AI initiatives. This scale of investment reflects the fierce pace of AI development and is interpreted by analysts as a structural tailwind for the broader tech sector.

From a valuation standpoint, while these companies remain richly priced, recent data shows that after the tech correction earlier this year, the gap between the Magnificent 7 and the broader market has narrowed meaningfully.

Chart 5: Magnificent 7 valuations revised closer to S&P 500

Source: Bloomberg. Mag 7 is Bloomberg Magnificent 7 Total Return Index. Data as of 31 July 2025.

Commodity-linked sectors starting to feel tariff damage

Contrasting with the success seen in the tech sectors, commodity-linked sectors (materials, utilities and energy) have seen over a third of reporting companies miss their estimates.

Companies in these sectors have limited ability to pass on tariff-driven input cost inflation, as materials and energy prices are typically determined by global spot market rates and are often subject to regulatory price ceilings.

Earnings misses punished harshly

While the June quarter earnings have generally exceeded expectations, there’s a sense of caution hidden in price reactions. As shown in the chart below, one-day share price gains following an earnings beat have ranged less than 2% relative to the broader index, whereas a single earnings miss could trigger a decline of 5–9%. This suggests that investors are disproportionately punishing earnings misses – a sign that expensive valuations at companies must be justified.

Chart 6: Earnings misses are met with outsized price declines

Source: VanEck. Bloomberg Intelligence. Date as of 31 July. Performance in USD.

Final thoughts

The second quarter of 2025 saw US tariff aggression shake up the world’s trade system. It’s too early to assess the full impact of these tariffs, but it feels unsettling. While robust corporate fundamentals, the AI boom and record foreign investment have kept this earnings season warm, a sense of caution can be seen in price reactions.

US companies could face a tougher test in the coming months as economic growth slows, flagged by the Fed and reflected in recent weaker economic data prints. While investors should welcome the AI-driven growth momentum, it is important to be selective.

 

[1] Based on blended sell side analysts estimates on Bloomberg.

 

Anna Wu is a Senior Associate, Cross-Asset Investment Research at VanEck, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This is general information only and does not take into account any person’s financial objectives, situation or needs. Any views expressed are opinions of the author at the time of writing and is not a recommendation to act.

The VanEck MSCI International Quality ETF (QUAL) tracks the MSCI World ex Australia Quality Index and invests in around 300 of the world’s highest quality companies. A hedged version of QUAL is also available for investors.

For more articles and papers from VanEck, please click here.

 

  •   20 August 2025
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Active managers: Bringing a gun to the gunfight

Who gains in an AI-supercharged economy?

High quality businesses are on sale

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.