Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 638

13 reflections on wealth and philanthropy

Here are 13 final reflections about wealth after 23 years working in the Australian philanthropy sector*:

  1. Most high net worth (HNW) families don’t do the calculation of ‘how much is enough?’, and keep creating wealth for the sake of it, without asking why?
  2. More thought needs to be given to ‘how much do the kids need?’ Leaving material wealth to the kids often results in poor outcomes. Kids need to learn to work. Warren Buffett: “Leave enough to your kids to do anything in life, but not enough to do nothing.”
  3. Our giving culture amongst HNW families remains poor. Nearly 25 years since the introduction of private ancillary funds (PAFs) and we still only have 2,200 PAFs (should be 15,000+). You can establish a sub-fund with $10,000 yet we only have around 3,500 (should be 100,000+). I regularly hear the expression, often from sector leaders, that Australians are generous. Until we look at the giving stats and have a frank discussion about our current generosity levels, and plan where we would like to be, little will change.
  4. We celebrate our Rich List a lot more than our Top 50 Givers List. Why is that? The philanthropic sector deserves more respect. Perhaps it hasn’t earned it? Let’s add a column to the Rich List: “% of wealth given away”.
  5. HNW families are surrounded by conflicted advisors, most of whom benefit from HNW families continually growing their wealth. Creating wealth for generations; for what purpose? With humanity’s current trajectory, and the rapidly growing inequality, there may not be much left in 100 years…
  6. We need to better tell the story of how a family foundation can be an extraordinary educational tool for the next generation. A foundation is a microcosm of a business. The kids can learn about governance, managing money, setting a mission, developing and implementing a strategy, measuring impact and the responsibility of wealth. Plus, the satisfaction of meeting amazing social entrepreneurs and backing them.
  7. Several wealth advisors have established a ‘philanthropic services’ team. Most know that some of these are not seriously trying to grow the philanthropic sector but simply trying to grow FUM from charities.
  8. $5 trillion is to be gifted to the next generation in Australia over the next two decades. Imagine if just 10% was gifted to charitable trusts i.e. $500 billion. This would result in around $25 billion being distributed to the community each year. Now imagine the positive community impact if this was done effectively.
  9. An Australian Giving Pledge, where influential HNW families publicly commit to giving away a minimum of 20% of their wealth in their lifetime or upon death, is the best idea I have seen to materially change the culture of giving amongst HNW families in Australia. (I rarely hear any ideas, let alone better ones.) We are influenced by our peers. We need to set the standard for giving in Australia.
  10. Let’s empower social entrepreneurs with the resources to develop plans to take a systems approach to tackling the biggest issues in Australia. And let’s pay them appropriately. There is no reason why we can’t action this.
  11. If you wish to maximise your impact, seek advice from skilled philanthropic advisors. Of course I’m biased, but good advisors are very under-rated.
  12. We have the wealth and intelligence to solve all issues on the planet, if we can be inspired to do so. I live in hope that the next generation will give more consideration to the constructive use of wealth. And that the next wave of philanthropic leaders will be less interested in their little fiefdom and will want to debate the above issues and push much harder for a much bigger and much better philanthropic sector.
  13. Don’t be satisfied with doing good; do great!

It’s time for a frank discussion on philanthropy in Australia. Given the wealth created in Australia in recent decades, philanthropy leaders should be targeting a much bigger and much better philanthropic sector. I’m not seeing it. The status quo isn’t working, other than some magic in a few areas.

“It’s amazing what you can accomplish if you don’t care who gets the credit”. Harry Truman

 

Peter Winneke is a philanthropy adviser and consultant, and author of “Give While You Live: A practical guide to more & better giving in Australia”.

*This is an edited version of Peter’s 31.10.25 LinkedIn post, “23 reflections about wealth after 23 years in the philanthropy sector”.

 

  •   19 November 2025
  • 8
  •      
  •   
8 Comments
Martin Mulcare
November 22, 2025

Thanks Peter. I think the dearth of comments on your provocative points is telling. Looks like we have a challenge when we launch Generous You in 2026....

1
GeorgeB
November 24, 2025

Philanthropy is paying 43% average income tax over a 40+ year professional career.

1
Dudley
November 20, 2025


"6. We need to better tell the story of how a family foundation can be an extraordinary educational tool for the next generation. A foundation is a microcosm of a business. The kids can learn about governance, managing money, setting a mission, developing and implementing a strategy, measuring impact and the responsibility of wealth.":

'Bunk of Dad&Mum'; Save 80%-90% of after tax after super income for about 4 years, investing sensibly, buy home at price matching savings, no mort-gage, go on to save 50%. Fail to save, pay market rent to 'Bank of Mum&Dad', fail to pay rent, get shoved out the door.

D
November 20, 2025

I’m on the board of a PAF- finding efficient charities is as much of challenge as managing the parasites accumulating FUM. I should know, I was one of them.

wuji
December 02, 2025

what is your thoughts on the metrics approach from EA entities like givewell and (I think) Singer's "life you can save" has somet rankings too. Sure EA took a major reputational hit due to SBF, but apparently the USAID disbanding has revitalized it somewhat.
Your "efficient" metric may be different to theirs which I believe is not about admin overhead but impact to the planet/sentient beings.

Mark Hayden
November 23, 2025

Excellent article. Great work Peter. And great work James in finding it and promoting it. Some of the excellent points are:
• #1 – very true, especially incorporating #2. Many people have more than enough wealth for themselves and for their kids.
• # 8 – That is a huge amount of money and could do a lot of good.
• #12 and #10 – a major goal or vision. Our wealth and intelligence could solve most/all issues, especially empowering social entrepreneurs.
• #4 Top 50 Givers – a great idea. I cannot see a downside.



lyn
November 25, 2025

Peter,
No mention people/business may donate but don't want it to be public information on a list.
Realise give whilst live article but executed 2 Wills, charities sole beneficiary, neither made large donations to reduce income tax in lifetimes which in a way, is laudable. Probably many such whole of estates but done quietly after death so no figures publicly available of large gifts which came from after-tax income.

I take it you mean your figure of $500bn is deductible as not further defined, some may question lack of income tax paid on $500bn over 20yrs, whether such deductions or part of should be allowed or if a business can afford high charitable donations to be called "philanthropic' then it can afford non - deductible gifting.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Structured giving's new moment

Preserving wealth through generations is hard

Charitable giving and tax deductions

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.