Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 654

Japan 2026: A new PM heralds a new golden age?

In October 2025, after a string of poor election results, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) chose Takaichi Sanae to become Prime Minister - Japan’s first female PM. Within months of her ascent, PM Takaichi went to the people and achieved a staggering result – a supermajority of more than two-thirds of the lower house. We believe her election success could underpin an increasingly confident path forward for Japan.

Japan today faces three key challenges:

  • Regaining economic vitality as it emerges from an extended period of deflation
  • Managing geopolitical challenges including tension with China
  • Long term demographic headwinds.

Takaichi PM recognises these issues are best addressed by creating incentives for the private sector to invest and raise productivity. Her reformist policies are pro-business, with focused fiscal stimulus and a dovish approach to monetary policy.

Growing Japan’s economy

Upon her appointment, Takaichi PM wasted little time, announcing a capable cabinet and several councils that are pursuing a growth agenda. Her government has unveiled reform proposals designed to encourage higher corporate capex, such as tax incentives for growth investments and R&D. These incentives set return hurdle rates of 15%, so should promote genuine growth.

To help secure supply chains, Japan’s Growth Strategy Council announced a roadmap for public and private investment in 17 strategic areas including shipbuilding, aerospace, quantum computing, fusion energy, automation and AI.

Most notable is a decision to increase Japanese defence spending. The Takaichi government has committed to raising this to 2% of nominal GDP by the end of FY25 with a potential further increase to 3%. We think these policies are an evolving response to a more unpredictable geopolitical environment and mirror similar increases seen in regions like the EU.

Increased spending should generate new earnings for Japanese defence equipment companies. Indeed defence companies were one of the key beneficiaries of the ‘Takaichi trade’ – the jump back to a record high for the Nikkei 225 straight after the election result. It’s in defence that PM Takaichi is most likely to use her new supermajority to seek constitutional reform.

Japan is back

Takaichi PM’s critics have their concerns. They question how Japan will fund its investment commitments and election promises (including consumption tax cuts) given already elevated government debt. We believe these debt concerns have been overblown in the past and do not see any hurdle to Japan financing its plans.

Intriguingly, Takaichi has said that Japanese corporations should focus on raising wages rather than shareholder returns.1

Recent corporate governance reforms championed by the Tokyo Stock Exchange encouraged companies to reward investors with share buybacks and improved dividends. Japan’s listed companies could pay out 20 trillion yen (US$127 billion) in dividends for the year to March 2026 – double what they paid ten years ago.2 This has been a key driver of Japan’s strong stock market. But do Takaichi’s comments signal a backpedaling on the governance reforms so crucial to Japan’s recent strong sharemarket performance?

Durable growth?

In a word, no. That Rubicon has been crossed and strong corporate governance is now a feature of Japan. It is uncommon to find corporates that do not take their governance obligations seriously. We think corporates will increase business investment, focusing on productivity, growth and business resilience, but not at the expense of shareholder returns.

As we’ve written before, the higher shareholder returns seen in recent years are but a prelude to the main event, namely a deep-seated reconfiguration of Japan’s industrial structure that could underpin prosperity for decades to come.

In our view, shareholder returns delivered without a long-term competitive vision are counterproductive. Therefore, boards should return excess capital to shareholders only if they can’t find compelling opportunities to invest in future growth.

We welcome higher returns, but we prefer to see firms use their capital to secure long-term growth to restructure their business portfolios, secure supply chain resilience and retrain their workforce. We think this is how Takaichi’s comments should be interpreted.

The technology opportunity - AI with fingers

As AI technologies mature, they can be deployed productively across Japanese enterprises, offsetting labour shortages and addressing bottlenecks. Production methods can move from manual to automated. This will require substantial amounts of R&D - and ingenuity.

Here we are upbeat about Japan’s prospects, given the industriousness of Japan’s workforce. Innovation drove Japan’s economic development in the 20th century, and we expect this century to be no different. Already we are seeing promising signs that the reshoring of manufacturing has begun, implying a new virtuous cycle of capex, job creation and higher wages.

In short, the first stage of the “Japan comeback” is now ending. The newer phase - a more innovative Japan - offers the prospect of both higher and more durable growth. And that’s good news for investors.

Morning in America meets the Rising Sun

President Trump visited Japan just a few weeks after Takaichi Sanae’s elevation to PM. Japan extended a warm welcome and in return Trump confirmed closer economic and security ties (as well as acting as a booster for Takaichi during her campaign). We have written previously around how the US/Japan relationship is mutually beneficial, matching Japanese manufacturing know-how with the US drive to rebuild their manufacturing base and boosting economic growth for both countries.

The mammoth U.S./Japan Strategic Investment Initiative, whereby Japan will invest $550 billion in US industry, is especially promising. Encouragingly, discussions are already underway on joint projects.

Japan has formidable manufacturing technology, particularly in precision applications like factory automation and robotics. (The chart below shows the growth in demand for Japan’s industrial robots).

Many commentators believe attempts to rebuild US manufacturing will flounder because the skills of its manufacturing workforce have deteriorated after decades of neglect due to offshoring. Some argue the US private sector doesn’t want to invest in manufacturing, preferring to fund higher return, capital-light sectors such as software.

We are more optimistic. Fortunately, Japan has an abundance of capital seeking investment, thus offering the US the funding and skills required to revive a competitive manufacturing base.

AI could play a crucial role. Today the beneficiaries of the AI boom tend to be makers of semiconductors and chip production equipment. The next phase could be deploying the rapidly improving capabilities of AI into real world applications - ‘physical AI’ – such as AI-enabled robotics and automation that augment or even replace human labour.

In early December, FANUC, the world’s pre-eminent maker of industrial robots and a key Platinum Japan Fund holding, announced a physical AI partnership with Nvidia and unveiled new open-platform, AI-enabled industrial robots that understand human language. We could be on the cusp of a new industrial revolution as physical AI pushes up industrial productivity while generating dramatically higher returns on investment.

A new competitive advantage for Japan

The implications are profound. Advanced manufacturing built on AI and robotics works for a Japan that has a shrinking labour force. For the US, it also removes a large part of the cost disadvantage of local supply chains. That upends one of the most potent arguments for offshoring to countries like China.

This move to reshore advanced manufacturing – and all the productivity gains and supply chain resilience it offers – is exactly what the US-Japan initiative is designed to encourage. This shift should boost growth at Japan’s leading companies and, with a pro-reform government equipped with a large majority, suggests to us that Japanese equities could be a good home for investors’ capital in the second half of the 2020s.

 

1. Shareholder returns includes dividends, share buybacks and capital gains.
2. See https://asia.nikkei.com/business/markets/japan-inc.-dividends-to-top-20tn-yen-for-1st-time-nearing-40-of-profit.

 

Leon Rapp is a Portfolio Manager – Japan strategies at Platinum Asset Management. This information is commentary only (i.e. our general thoughts). It is not intended to be, nor should it be construed as, investment advice. To the extent permitted by law, no liability is accepted for any loss or damage as a result of any reliance on this information. Before making any investment decision you need to consider (with your financial adviser) your particular investment needs, objectives and circumstances.

 

  •   18 March 2026
  • 3
  •      
  •   
3 Comments
john
March 22, 2026

It was sickening that trump raised Pearl Harbour with their PM, considering that was a completely different epoch

3
ian
March 25, 2026

no discussion of the 3rd headwind,demography.
Or isn't it a problem if AI takes all the jobs?

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Is the Paris Agreement on climate change dead?

Why China and Russia's partnership threatens the West

Japan: New dawn or same old story?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.