Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 578

A megatrend hiding in plain sight: defence

Information technology is not the only sector holding up share markets. There is another industry. We all rely on it, but the opportunity on ASX is scant. It’s a global sector hiding in plain sight.

Protecting its citizens and keeping them safe is the responsibility of governments. Since ancient times civilisations have grappled with this, and the changing technologies and material demands of protecting borders and populations are complex. More recently the cyber world has become a battleground, and the defence industry is again at the forefront of technology.

But when we read stories about defence spending, we do not normally associate this with investing. The reality is that governments are spending more than ever on defence, and much of the budget is being directed toward listed companies that are leaders in their fields. These companies operate in diverse sub-industries including aerospace & defence, and electronic equipment & instruments.

These sectors are typically under-represented in broad market benchmarks. The S&P/ASX 200 index has zero exposure to these military and defence industries, while the S&P 500 and MSCI World ex Australia indices have 1.95% and 1.98% exposure respectively.

For long-term investors, these sectors have historically outperformed the broader market.

Chart 1: Total cumulative index returns since 1989.

Source: Morningstar Direct 1989 to 31 August 2024. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. You cannot invest in an index.

Unhappily, the world has changed from countries celebrating the peace dividend, a term used to describe the economic benefits of a decrease in defence spending. Instead, countries are ramping up military expenditure.

We think there are three key reasons for investors to consider a defence allocation within a diversified equities portfolio.

1 – Spending by governments toward the sector is increasing

Although Australia is far removed from troubles plaguing other parts of the world, it is not immune from the flow over effects from uncertain times. In 2023, defence expenditure hit a record high and accounted for 1.92% of GDP and 5.06% of total government expenditure in Australia – a 6% increase from the previous year. Australia’s defence spending is set to increase further with the Government committed to spending 2.4% of GDP to this sector by 2033-34, which is roughly $100 billion.

It is a similar story for other NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) and NATO-friendly countries. NATO was founded in 1949 following WWII by Canada, United States and several Western European nations. This Alliance was created to provide political integration and collective security across the regions and now includes 32 countries. In 2014, NATO governments agreed to commit 2% of their national GDP to defence spending to help ensure the Alliance’s continued military readiness.

Compared to other parts of the world, the post-Cold War period has seen significant underinvestment in the defence sector by European nations. As a result, defence capability has suffered in many nations. This has begun to shift in recent years, with Germany a prime example.

A leaked Inspector General report on the state of the German army in 2022 highlighted poor results for functional weapons. It further implied the situation was even more dire in the other parts of the army. As a result, the German government passed a bill allocating €100 billion to a special defence fund and also announced intentions to increase its yearly defence spending.

Elsewhere, The Netherlands shifted policy and approved an additional €5 billion in defence investments and the UK announced that it would increase defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2030. This will inject an additional £75 billion over six years and retain the UK’s place as the second largest defence spender in NATO.

This year, 23 NATO allies are expected to meet or exceed the defence spending target, compared to only three Allies in 2014. This represents a significant increase in collective investment to the industry. NATO Allies have also agreed that at least 20% of defence expenditure should be devoted to major new equipment. This includes associated research and development, perceived as a crucial indicator for the scale and pace of modernisation.

Globally, data released by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sipri) for 2023 showed that global military expenditure grew 7% to US$2.43 trillion, the steepest annual rise since 2009 as international peace and security deteriorated.

Chart 2: World defence expenditure: 1992 to 2023

Source: Sipri, VanEck, figures are represented in constant 2022 US dollars.

2 – Demand for the sector’s products and services has not historically correlated to the economic cycle.

It is important to note that defence expenditure has historically been agnostic of the economic climate. Looking at chart 2 above, defence spending rose during the last three US recessions (the grey shaded area).

3 – The defence industry has historically been at the forefront of technological development and advancement

Military and defence sector companies generally invest heavily in research and development to create new technologies, inventions and products.

This can often lead to technological development and advancements that spill over into areas beyond military use to everyday life.  Some everyday products and innovations that have deep roots in the military sector include the internet, GPS satellite navigation, microwave ovens and super glue.

Additionally, in the modern world, defence strategies must consider a broad range of factors, beyond military and weapons, to effectively protect a country’s security and prepare for potential threats.

Cyber security, satellites and communications, analytics and event response software, and training services are now included in defence budgets and represent further growth opportunities for defence firms.

Australia’s first defence ETF, the VanEck Global Defence ETF (ASX: DFND) launched earlier this month on ASX.

Key risks: An investment in our defence ETF carries risks associated with: ASX trading time differences, financial markets generally, individual company management, industry sectors, foreign currency, country or sector concentration, political, regulatory and tax risks, fund operations, liquidity and tracking an index. Once available, see the PDS and TMD for more details.

 

Arian Neiron is CEO and Managing Director - Asia Pacific at VanEck, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This is general information only and does not take into account any person’s financial objectives, situation or needs. Investors should do their research and talk to a financial adviser about which products best suit their individual needs and investment objectives.

For more articles and papers from VanEck, click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

2022 outlook: buy a raincoat but don't put it on yet

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

16 ASX stocks to buy and hold forever, updated

This time last year, I highlighted 16 ASX stocks that investors could own indefinitely. One year on, I look at whether there should be any changes to the list of stocks as well as which companies are worth buying now. 

UniSuper’s boss flags a potential correction ahead

The CIO of Australia’s fourth largest super fund by assets, John Pearce, suggests the odds favour a flat year for markets, with the possibility of a correction of 10% or more. However, he’ll use any dip as a buying opportunity.

Is Gen X ready for retirement?

With the arrival of the new year, the first members of ‘Generation X’ turned 60, marking the start of the MTV generation’s collective journey towards retirement. Are Gen Xers and our retirement system ready for the transition?

2025-26 super thresholds – key changes and implications

The ABS recently released figures which are used to determine key superannuation rates and thresholds that will apply from 1 July 2025. This outlines the rates and thresholds that are changing and those that aren’t.  

Reform overdue for family home CGT exemption

The capital gains tax main residence exemption is no longer 'fit for purpose', due to its inequities, inefficiency, and complexity. Here are several suggestions for adapting or curtailing the concession.

So, we are not spending our super balances. So what!

A Grattan Institute report suggests lifetime annuities as a solution to people not spending their super balances. The issue is whether underspending is the real problem or a sign of more fundamental failings in our retirement system.

Latest Updates

Investing

Why the $5.4 trillion wealth transfer is a generational tragedy

The intergenerational wealth transfer, largely driven by a housing boom, exacerbates economic inequality, stifles productivity, and impedes social mobility. Solutions lie in addressing the housing problem, not taxing wealth.

Economy

The 2025 Australian Federal election – implications for investors

With an election due by 17 May, we are effectively in campaign mode with the Government announcing numerous spending promises since January and the Coalition often matching them. Here's what the election means for investors.

Superannuation

Three underrated investment risks in retirement

Your chances of having a comfortable retirement are not only dictated by your super fund's investment returns. Investors must also consider the risks of longevity, inflation, and not sticking to the plan.

Economy

100 years of tariff lessons

The global economy faces renewed protectionism with President Trump's tariffs sparking retaliatory actions and causing market volatility. Historically, quality companies have shown resilience amid trade tensions and uncertainty. 

Investing

Amid a tornado of headlines, where can investors find opportunity?

Major equity indices will need to defy history if they are to deliver anything like the returns of recent years. In a rapidly changing environment, investors may need to look further afield for the next winners.

Superannuation

Extending performance tests to retirement super is a bad idea

Most superannuation products offered to working-age Australians are now performance-tested, and there are calls to extend these tests to account-based pensions. It's likely to result in more pain than gain, though.

Investing

Winning by not losing: The silver rule of investing

The more aggressively you try to compress your timeline and chase that one massive windfall, the more likely you are to stumble. Here's a better approach, using examples from The Battle of Britain, tennis, and Charlie Munger.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.