Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 136

Anchoring holds back your investing

We all have trouble buying stocks that have gone up and selling stocks that have gone down. If that’s you then I regret to inform you that you are being affected by a well-established financial concept called ‘anchoring’.

Source: Wikipedia

You hear the issue every day in a broking office and in stock discussions. It’s when someone says “I can’t buy that because the share price is up X%” or “You can’t sell that, the price is down Y%”. An even more soft-brained development on the theme is when you find yourself saying “It’s down X% so it’s cheap” or “It’s up Y% so it’s expensive.”

It’s the future that matters

Making money in shares is about where the share price is going in the future. Where the share price has been in the past is pretty much irrelevant. What you paid for a stock and what price it was in the past is a distraction from what the company is worth now or in the future and where the market might take the price.

Anchoring, also known as ‘focusing bias’, is the use of a reference point against which to judge value. For share prices it means using past share prices as a reference point for the current share price even though the past price is not a factor in assessing current value.

How often do you reference how much a stock has moved from the lowest price it hit or the highest price it hit? Those prices form an anchor point from which we judge the current price and, left to idly ponder, we tend to develop a bias that says something is expensive or cheap.

Past performance is simply a statement of where the price was. The more important consideration is where the price is now relative to what the company is worth. On the basis that the market's appreciation of the value of a company changes as time progresses, past prices become redundant as a reference point as soon as the value of a company changes, which arguably it does every day.

Academic studies suggest that the less known about the subject matter, the more prevalent the use of anchoring. In other words, the higher the level of guesswork involved, the more likely we are to employ anchoring, to use (even randomly generated) reference points to help us make a decision we have to make. It’s grasping for an ‘irrelevant crutch’. There is no wisdom in basing investment decisions on anything other than an estimate of current value.

When forecasters ‘herd’ together

On a related matter there is an interesting phenomenon in forecasting which says that the more uncertainty there is and the more difficult it is to forecast something, the more tightly grouped the forecasts tend to be. You would imagine the opposite but it seems that one of the biggest drivers for forecasters is the fear of getting it wrong, of standing out from the crowd alone ... and being wrong. This manifests itself in 'herding' in the face of heightened uncertainty. When something is difficult to forecast, the moment the first forecaster publishes their forecast, rather than reflect the wide range of uncertainty, others herd to the first forecast. This 'rallying to the flag' creates a tight forecast range which makes it even harder for other forecasters to 'go wide'.

Using anchoring in negotiations

Back to anchoring. Anchoring is also a tool for the smart negotiator.

The skill of the second hand car salesman, for instance, is to put down an anchor as quickly as possible that will then act as a standard for the rest of the negotiation. It is a technique used by flea market stall holders. As a buyer, the worst mistake is to feed into this process by asking the price (rookie error), you’re simply going to open the negotiation at the top price straight away.

A smart buyer will go in hard and early with their own anchor price point so the negotiation starts at the bottom rather than the top and it is the stall holder who has to pull it up, rather than you spending the rest of the negotiation trying to drag it down.

You see anchoring in the stock market all the time. Look out for anyone that starts their assessment of a stock with “It’s up X% from the low”, as they are clearly an amateur or lazy investor with no ‘intrinsic value’ reference point.

You’ll know if your trading is driven by anchoring if you are the sort of trader that buys stocks because they have fallen a lot. This is technically wrong anyway but also ignores the fact that the market’s assessment of the value of the company has been changing constantly for the worse.

Purchase price as the anchor point

The other very widespread use of anchoring is when traders use their purchase price as a reference point. “I’ll sell it if it goes up 10%” or “I’ll sell if it goes below my purchase price.” All very nice but not rational (although, in its defence, anything, even unscientific anchoring, is better than nothing when it comes to having some trading discipline).

The best way to avoid anchoring is to forget the past price as a reference point and simply assess ‘cheap or expensive’ on some other criteria (PE history perhaps, or price relative to an intrinsic value calculation would be more useful).

Meanwhile you can amuse yourself by listening out for anyone (you, perhaps) making comments or decisions on the basis that a stock is up X% or down Y%. Your sole focus is whether a stock is going up or not. Whether it’s gone up or not is irrelevant.

MP Figure2 271115

 

Marcus Padley is a stockbroker and founder of the Marcus Today share market newsletter. He has been advising institutional clients and a private client base for over 32 years. This article is for general education purposes only and does not address the personal circumstances of any individual.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.