Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 75

A guide to real estate investing strategies

Securitisation and the increased sophistication of the real estate industry have led to new ways to repackage property assets to create a broader menu of investment opportunities. However, the risk, return and liquidity attributes of these investments vary greatly.

This paper provides an overview of different real estate investment strategies based on three risk-return styles (core, value-added and opportunistic) and four quadrants of real estate investing, based on whether they are equity or debt and traded in the public (listed) or private markets.

Risk – return styles

Figure 1 shows three key risk-return styles for real estate investing: core, value-added and opportunistic.

AH Chart1 150814

AH Chart1 150814

Core real estate investing is buying assets that are well located, leased to quality tenants and funded with modest levels of leverage. Such investments typically target 9%-12% p.a. total returns with the objective of providing investors with secure income plus modest capital appreciation. The income component typically represents a significant majority (circa 70%) of the expected total return. Examples of core investments include CBD office buildings, retail centres and industrial warehouses.

The ability to significantly enhance the value of core real estate is limited compared to value-added and opportunistic investment strategies. Core assets generally require little or no short-term capital expenditure other than normal repairs and maintenance.

However, core investing does not mean passive management. Active management of core assets can add value through initiatives such as improving lease profiles and reducing building operating costs. Core real estate tends to be held for the long-term, typically five years or more. Leverage is generally below 50%.

In recent years, real estate related social infrastructure such as child care centres, medical centres and student accommodation have increasingly been considered as legitimate core investments. There are both listed and unlisted real estate funds focusing specifically on these sectors such as the Folkestone Education Trust, the Generation Healthcare REIT and the unlisted Australian Unity Healthcare Fund.

Value-added investing engages in active strategies to create value in the underlying real estate investments through refurbishment, re-development or leasing-up of vacant space. A value-added strategy typically targets ‘secondary’ assets which for various reasons have depressed levels of income or the value has deteriorated over time relative to the broader market. Through hands on ‘active management’ there is a focus on increasing an asset’s income and hence capital value. Value-added real estate investments will therefore appeal to investors seeking enhanced returns in exchange for higher levels of asset operating risk. These investments target returns between 10%-15% p.a. and typically use modest to high levels of leverage of between 30% and 70%. They have a hold period of between three and seven years, although often at the shorter end, asthe successful execution of the strategy will depend on picking the right time in the real estate cycle to exploit the opportunity.

Opportunistic investing targets a range of higher risk strategies such as real estate development, highly leveraged financing or transactions involving ‘turnaround’ potential (often known as distressed investing), investments with complicated financial structures (including mezzanine debt) or emerging market investments. The focus is on capital appreciation, with the returns typically back-ended and achieved through a sale or completion of a development, often with little income along the way.

Such strategies usually use higher levels of leverage between 50% and 80% and typically target returns of 15% p.a. plus.

Opportunistic strategies require specialised investment and management expertise due to their complexity and to mitigate the higher risk. Investors tend to be sophisticated and well capitalised with a higher risk appetite than core or value-added investors. Opportunistic investing looks at relatively short-term hold periods, in many cases less than three years. The key is to expeditiously exit the investment as the strategy is executed and value maximised.

Value-added and opportunistic investing is not simply the use of high levels of leverage. They require careful analysis of the real estate cycle and market trends to take advantage of dislocations and mispricing in the market.

Four quadrant investing

Four quadrant investing refers to the classification of real estate investing across four financial markets - public and private, debt and equity - as shown in Figure 2.

AH Chart2 150814

The most common forms of private market in Australia, other than directly owning a building, are unlisted real estate funds or unlisted syndicates which typically own one asset such as an office building or retail centre and have a fixed term of between five and seven years. These investments are traded in the private market, and between purchase and sale, values are derived from private valuations. Such assets are relatively illiquid compared with the public markets.

Public equity refers to investments in real estate investment trusts (A-REITs) or real estate companies whose securities or shares are traded on a stock exchange such as the ASX. The A-REIT market is the most liquid and transparent of the four quadrant markets, and currently comprises 50 A-REITs with a market capitalisation in excess of $97 billion. There are another 29 real estate-related securities that are classified by S&P/ASX as real estate managers and developers.

Private debt represents investments in direct real estate loans or in funds that hold mortgages on real estate, such as mortgage trusts. The loans maybe first mortgages (senior debt) or second ranking subordinated loans such as mezzanine loans. Typically, the investor or lender will receive periodic interest payments from the borrower and a security charge against the property in the form of a mortgage. At the end of the mortgage term, the investor or lender will receive the balance of the mortgage principal. This type of real estate investing is similar to investing in bonds that are held to maturity.

Public debt represents real estate debt instruments such as commercial mortgage back securities (CMBS) which are traded in the public market or unsecured debt (corporate bonds) issued by A-REITs and real estate companies. Access to investing in the public real estate debt market in Australia is almost exclusively limited to institutional or ‘wholesale’ investors.

The four quadrant model of investing emphasises the links between real estate and the capital markets. The income from each of these investments relies on the performance of the underlying real estate despite the fact that the pricing, the risk and the liquidity will depend on which part of the spectrum (debt or equity) the investment occurs and whether it is traded in the public or private market.

Conclusion

Whilst the menu of real estate investment opportunities has increased, not all investment styles and strategies across the four quadrants are suitable for all investors. Most investors in real estate will focus on core real estate strategies and will typically invest in the quadrant that best suits their liquidity requirements. If liquidity is an important factor, an investment in public equity such as A-REITs may be a more viable investment alternative than private real estate either directly or through an unlisted fund or syndicate.

Given the different markets and risk profiles, pricing anomalies in the short term may occur across the three investment styles and four quadrants. A more sophisticated investor may take advantage of these pricing arbitrages and move across the three styles or allocate between the four quadrants according to where they expect to achieve the best relative risk-adjusted returns at different points in the real estate cycle.

 

Adrian Harrington is Head of Funds Management at Folkestone, an ASX-listed (ASX Code: FLK) real estate funds manager and developer. Folkestone Funds Management offers real estate funds to private clients and select institutional investors.


 

Leave a Comment:

     

RELATED ARTICLES

Real estate outlook: positive returns expected in challenging year

Real estate social infrastructure coming of age

Tax reform favours apartments and owner-occupiers

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?

Interviews

Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.

Superannuation

Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.