Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 72

Changes to Centrelink treatment of account-based pensions

From 1 January 2015 the way account-based income streams (including account-based pensions) will be assessed under the income test for Centrelink purposes is changing.

The age pension rules

Any account-based pension commenced on or after 1 January 2015 will be treated as a financial asset and deemed under the income test.

Account-based pensions commenced prior to 1 January 2015 where the pensioner is in receipt of Centrelink benefits at 1 January 2015 will be grandfathered under the existing rules.

Where the grandfathering conditions are not met or where a person ceases to receive Centrelink entitlements, their pension will be treated under the deeming rules when the person next applies for the age pension. As such any existing pension held by persons who are not receiving Centrelink entitlements at 1 January 2015 will be assessed as a financial asset under the income test.

Also, consider a household on the ‘border’ currently receiving a small age pension entitlement. If good investment returns are experienced, the value of their assets may increase and this may cause them to lose their age pension entitlement. Following this, the pension is then assessed as a deemed income stream for future age pension entitlements.

The table below outlines the changes. Please note the treatment for the assets test is not changing.MD Table1 250714

MD Table1 250714

Deciding what to do before 1 January 2015

There has been a lot of discussion around what decisions could be made to maximise the income test and ultimately the long term age pension outcome for clients with existing pensions who are in receipt of Centrelink benefits prior to 1 January 2015 including:

1.  Would ‘rebooting’ (ie. commuting and recommencing) any existing pensions prior to 1 January provide a better deduction amount?

As the social security changes relate to pensions commencing on or after 1 January 2015, rebooting a pension before that date will lock in the relevant deduction amount for any future age pension assessment.

If the pension is rebooted after 1 January 2015, the deduction amount will be irrelevant as the pension will be assessed as a deemed income stream for future age pension entitlements.

2.  Would a change to death benefit nominations affect the grandfathered rules for the pensioner’s spouse?

Where a pensioner with a grandfathered account-based pension passes away, the pension will only continue to be treated as grandfathered under the income test where the pension automatically continues to be paid to a reversionary beneficiary, and where the beneficiary is also in receipt of Centrelink benefits.

Unless the terms of the pension specify an automatic reversion, the death benefit pension may fall under the new deeming rules. Note that changing the death benefit nominations of a pension to be automatically reversionary may involve rebooting the account-based pension.

Age pension implications

The age pension entitlement under the income test for a deemed account-based pension in the short term may lead to lower pension entitlements, but there may come a point during retirement where the entitlement using the deeming rules is greater than the entitlement under the grandfathered rules. At this point, depending on the person’s particular circumstances, the member may consider whether or not to reboot their pension (to be assessed under the deeming rules) to help maximise their age pension entitlement as highlighted in the following case study.

Case study: income test decision point

Consider Fred and Jane:

  • a 65-year-old couple
  • assets of $500,000 all held in Fred’s SMSF
  • spend $58,000 per annum increasing in line with inflation.

Fred retired during 2014 and commenced an account-based pension with all of his SMSF assets.

Fred and Jane are currently eligible for a part age pension from Centrelink and the income test rules applying to Fred’s account-based pension will be grandfathered from 1 January 2015. Their $58,000 of spending will be partly sourced from the age pension and partly from the SMSF assets.

If the SMSF earns 4% p.a. real returns (over and above inflation) then in this example we would expect their SMSF balance to reduce over time. By modelling the drawdown of the SMSF assets we can compare all three Centrelink means tests in future years:

(a)  income test under the grandfathered rules

(b)  income test under the new deeming rules

(c)   assets test

(a)  Age pension entitlements – grandfathered rules

The graph below shows the projected age pension entitlement under both the assets test and the grandfathered income test rules.MD Graph1 250714

The black lines represent the asset test entitlement in each year, and the orange line the income test entitlement based on the existing deduction amount rules.

We see initially the asset test is dominant, and then at age 80 the income test takes over to determine the age pension received. The age pension entitlement reduces after age 80 because the income test deduction amount is reducing in today’s purchasing power.

The total payments from the age pension between now and age 90, in today’s purchasing power, is approximately $763,000. The example assumes that the Centrelink thresholds and rates keep pace with inflation over time.

(b)  Age pension entitlements – deeming rules

If Fred decided to commute and recommence his pension at 1 January 2015 then the pension would be deemed under the income test. The means test results using the deeming rules is shown below in blue.MD Graph2 250714

The income test takes over at age 78, two years earlier than under the grandfathered rules. The total payments from the age pension between now and age 90, in today’s purchasing power, is approximately $789,000.

What Fred and Jane really need to do is look at what this means overall …

Centrelink entitlements – grandfathering, then switching

Examining both graphs in this case study; we can see that Fred and Jane will receive less age pension from age 78 to age 80 under the deeming rules, then from age 81 onwards the deeming rules provide a higher income test entitlement.

The graph below illustrates all three means test outcomes:MD Graph3 250714

Switching over to the deeming rules by rebooting the grandfathered pension at age 81 may help maximise the age pension during the period that the income test determines the pension received.

From the date of commutation onwards Fred is then locked in to the deeming rules and can’t re-elect to have the grandfathered rules apply. But we can see that under these assumptions the highest Centrelink entitlements come from opting for the deeming rules as assets deplete. In this example, the age pension entitlement increases to the full age pension in later years rather than continuing to decline. The total payments from the age pension between now and age 90, in today’s purchasing power, is approximately $790,000.

Fred and Jane’s actual decision would need to be monitored over time to take into account fund values, ongoing spending plans and Centrelink rates and bands at the time.

Grandfathering considerations

There may be some advantages of commencing or rebooting account-based pensions before 31 December 2014, thereby locking in existing rules for clients who are in receipt of Centrelink entitlements. These include:

  • The income test entitlement may be lower in the short term under the new deeming rules, so if the income test is determining the client’s age pension entitlement, the existing rules may be more advantageous.
  • Grandfathered pensions won’t be exposed to the risk of increased deeming rates in the future.
  • A pension may be rebooted at any later date to enable the pension to be assessed under the new deeming rules.

Based on the above, it appears that grandfathered pensions will provide the most flexibility in potential social security outcomes for clients. However, rules continue to change and retirees need to stay on top of entitlement amendments.


Melanie Dunn is SMSF Technical Services Manager at Accurium (formerly Bendzulla Actuarial). This information illustrates social security treatment of income streams only and is not intended to be financial product advice, legal advice or tax advice, and should not be relied upon as such. Individuals should seek appropriate professional advice before making any financial decisions.

Not giving advice
June 26, 2018

Martin, call the Australian Tax Office on 132865 and talk to them. They will tell you what you need to know.

June 25, 2018


Ms Grump
June 26, 2018

Apart from having no details about you, kindly note that any country's official answer will be, if you earn income, check with a professional regarding whether you need to file a return.

By the way, writing IN ALL CAPS is usually recognized as SHOUTING, and therefore a bit rude.

Not giving advice
June 26, 2018

That's not actually true, Ms Grump - the bit about the tax office will point you to getting professional advice.

Here's the ATO's on-line tool to help people work out whether they need to lodge a return or not:

So Martin, I assume since you posted on Cuffelinks that you're computer literate, so just go to the ATO website via this link and work it out for yourself.

Neil Kozlowski
August 23, 2017

I have been receiving a part Age Pension for over 4 years & recently I had the misfortune to have my Grandfathered Allocated Pension treated under the Deeming rules, simply because for one fortnight my earnings exceeded the maximum Income Threshold.

From what I understand my Allocated Pension should only be treated under the Deeming rules if I actually reapplied for the Age Pension, refer a quote on your website ("Where the grandfathering conditions are not met or where a person ceases to receive Centrelink entitlements, their pension will be treated under the deeming rules when the person next applies for the age pension"

Are you able to advise me whether or not I have a case to challenge Centrelink

Thank you

Graham Hand
August 24, 2017

Sorry, Neil, Cuffelinks is not licensed to give personal financial advice on such a specific subject. I will refer your question to the author who might respond.

Darryl Leeder
September 28, 2014

What is the asset threshold for me a 65 year old who wants to get pension but not for wife who is nearly 4years younger than me.I supposeyou could also tell me what is the income limit as well.


Leave a Comment:



Check pension outcomes when making a will

Check the Centrelink rules before gifting

Defined benefit pensions and the transfer balance cap


Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Latest Updates


Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?


Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.


Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.