Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 360

Choosing an index fund is more than just the expense ratio

Index funds were initially labelled a ‘sure path to mediocrity’ in their quest to mirror benchmarks. But since the first index fund was launched some 45 years ago, millions of investors across the world have taken advantage of this easy-to-implement investment vehicle that offers transparency, diversification, low costs and tax efficiency.

Many investors have found the search for winning active managers an exciting but ultimately unrewarding experience. In contrast, index funds have regularly produced returns that are 1-2% above the average active managers.

(Having said this, even investors who clearly recognise the powerful case for index funds often find a place in their carefully-constructed portfolios for some favoured actively managed funds. At Vanguard, it is not a case of having index or active management to the exclusion of the other).

Let’s talk about how to go about picking an index funds. When it comes to selecting a manager, there are a lot of options out there.

Costs are not the only differentiator

Driven in part by lower direct and indirect costs, which have benefited all investors, index products continue to grow in efficiency, popularity, and volume.

As a result, index fund expense ratios have compressed meaningfully across the industry and fee differences between funds have become less of a differentiator.

While this broad-based downward shift in index fund expense ratios has undoubtedly resulted in better investment outcomes and savings for all index investors, it has also created a new dilemma.

How does an index investor select managers and funds from the pack in this new 'everyone is a low-fee provider' environment? An investor might reasonably ask, how hard can indexing be?

Just like baking, all it takes is to follow a recipe precisely. Flour, water, yeast and a few hours later, the oven yields a lovely crisp loaf of sourdough. But as many have discovered on novice baking journeys brought on by the pandemic, the process is much more than throwing together a couple of ingredients and dropping it in the oven.

Indexing is not dissimilar. Resources, index expertise, investment sophistication and other factors can provide an edge. Investors should not merely pick the lowest cost index fund because, as with baking, the quality of the ingredients and the skills of the baker matter. 

Looking beyond expense ratios

Prudent investment selection cannot be achieved by focusing on cost alone.

When searching for and selecting between index investment options, investors should use a decision-making framework that takes into account a range of factors, including expenses, portfolio management capabilities, securities lending programmes, pricing strategies and scale in more equal weights than in the past.

A recent whitepaper by Vanguard provides a framework to help investors select the best index fund managers. Below are some of the main points covered.

Exploring the factors that matter

Organisational incentives – Index fund managers come in all shapes and sizes. The details here are important because an asset manager’s philosophy defines the incentives that drive the firm’s business strategy. Does the investor’s interest or the asset manager’s interest come first?

Register here to receive the Firstlinks weekly newsletter for free

Portfolio management track record – Despite the boiler plate warnings, “past performance, while not a guarantee of future performance”, this is actually a great place to look. What historical track records do the index managers and funds have when it comes to performance after fees? Good index managers can track tightly and add incremental value to cover some or all of the management fees. Process frictions, inefficiencies and an inability to capture value add opportunities, like a thousand little papers cuts, will show up over time in long-term performance.

Buy/sell Spreads – When it comes to the total cost of ownership, buy/sell spreads must be factored in. What’s the point of going with a low expense ratio fund if it is lost on high spread costs?

With great scale comes better returns – Scale is a key differentiator and one that is increasingly difficult for new entrants to achieve. Scale enables asset managers to lower fixed trading costs like commissions and ticket charges, track or replicate benchmarks with greater precision and strengthen relationships with trading partners.

Expense ratio – I know I said it did not matter anymore, but there are a few managers and funds still charging high active-type prices for index products. This is an obvious red flag.

Managing an index is harder than it looks

Index equity managers should produce returns that are, on average, approximately equal to their benchmark index minus the fund’s expense ratio.

This concept applies broadly across markets, while the costs—and the consequent performance drag—range from minimal in developed markets to modest in emerging markets. For sophisticated index fund managers, opportunities exist to add value through the daily management of the portfolio.

Successfully taking advantage of these opportunities can effectively offset the expense ratio and increase investor returns.

Simple to understand, yes. Simple to execute, no.

Indexing is simple for investors to understand and use. It is this perception of indexing, of merely meeting a set benchmark, that has led to it being known as ‘passive‘ or ‘average’ investing. Indexing certainly is simple for investors to understand and use but it is definitely not simple to execute. Heavy investment activity and resourcing is required.

Not all indexers are the same, and this framework shows where to look in an index fund search.


Duncan Burns is Head of Equity Indexing for Asia Pacific at Vanguard Australia, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information purposes only and does not consider the circumstances of any individual.

For more articles and papers from Vanguard Investments Australia, please click here.


June 04, 2020

Another issue to watch is the growth of Units on issue.
I invested in a simple ASX 200 index fund with low fees. This has allowed it to grow quite well but when it comes time for the quarterly distributions to be made the longer-term holder gets diluted as units created after the companies in the index have paid dividends also get their share of dividends in the ETF distribution.

Graham Hand
June 04, 2020

Hi Dave. this issue is common to many pooled funds, not only the one you identify. See this explanation:

June 04, 2020

Thanks Graham,
Just read the link.
Have many funds have used Attribution Managed Investment Trust mentioned in the article since 2017. I have never heard of it before.

June 04, 2020

Lending (renting) investor's securities to short sellers?

June 03, 2020

How does Vanguard Australia "add incremental value to covers some or all of your management fees" ?

Duncan Burns
June 09, 2020

Hi J.D. Good question. The framework in the White Paper explains many of the incremental value add/saving opportunities explored. With regards to a few specific areas where Vanguard can add value to cover some of the management fee or, in some cases in excess of the management fee, here are some examples in no particular order of importance:
• For international funds (particularly those investing in US securities) there is a difference between the assumed tax in the benchmark and that which is actually paid by an Australian investor, in the instance of Vanguard International Shares index fund this has historically added between 20 and 25 basis points per year to the funds return over the benchmark
• Participation in corporate actions can add some value at times e.g. capital raisings and placements
• Intelligent trading around index changes, cash flows and other corporate events
• Securities lending is generally considered by most academic and industry studies to promote and improve market efficiency (more information can be found in this WFE research report released April of this year:'s%20paper%20%2D%20What%20does,inefficiency%20and%20hamper%20price%20discovery.)


Leave a Comment:



Poacher turned gamekeeper changes his wealth model

Fund giant feels heat in ETF fee war


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.