Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 529

Clime time: Why stocks beat bonds for income investors

Over the past 10 years, the S&P/ASX Price Index has delivered meek returns, though the picture improves when dividends are included in the Total Return Index.

The 10-year returns are:

  1. The Price Index return is about 38% or 3.2% annual compound, and
  2. The Accumulation (Total Return) Index is about 110% or 8% annual compound (but before franking).

Following the market correction since mid-August 2023, the capital gain of the market index from when Covid hit in March 2020 is now about zero for the last 4.5 years. The return including dividends that are fully reinvested is a healthier 30% (pre franking) over the entire period. However, this 4.5-year return of about 6.6% per annum is below both our targeted and expected long-term return of 8% per annum.

In reality, the Accumulation Index return is an appropriate measure of the equity market return for an SMSF in 'accumulation mode'. However, it is not a measure of the (longer-term) return for an investor who takes the cash dividend from the market to fund a pension. 

The post-Covid investment cycle

This background leads us to consider the dramatic change in income returns across asset classes that have flowed as the world economy transitioned from post GFC, through Covid and now into a post-Covid cycle.

Projected and actual asset returns drive investment allocation that is also adjusted by the risk profile of the investor (SMSF). Returns from capital gain and income, from all asset classes, will be driven by the investment climate as measured by cash rates, bond yields and the interplay of 'risk free returns' with equity prices measured by Price/Earnings Ratios (PER) and property capitalisation rates.

The world has moved from the post-GFC cycle where the introduction of quantitative easing (QE) to fund burgeoning government debt, plus highly supportive fiscal settings, dominated. Covid checked the anticipated slowdown and the reversal of QE towards quantitative tightening (QT). Indeed, it actually reaccelerated QE, noting it was aggressively introduced in both Australia and around the world. A feature of the Covid era was that most bond yields across the world hovered well below 1% and they were deeply negative in Europe and Japan.

The post COVID era, began during 2022 when lockdowns ceased, ushered in a new investing environment. The era of near zero interest rates is over, and decades of deflation driven by globalisation and demographic changes are being replaced by an extended period of cost-based inflation.

Across asset classes, the most material change has been seen in bond markets. For instance, over the last two years, the yield on an Australian two-year bond has moved from near zero to above 4%. It has been a painful period for passive bond investors with the price of all bonds materially declining. The good news today is that the annual income that can be generated from holding a 'near risk free asset' has become more attractive in nominal terms. But are bonds attractive enough?

Preferring equities over bonds

While bonds can deliver the benefits of diversification in a balanced portfolio, the argument for their role as a key driver of portfolio returns must be framed relative to inflation. Inflation has probably peaked in Australia, yet the most recent CPI release for the June quarter was 6%, still well above the two-year bond yield. Given that government bonds are a fixed income returning assets, their ability to outperform inflation is not currently on offer.

Therefore, a pension portfolio should maintain an appropriate and meaningful allocation to the Australian equity market with the purpose to deliver a growing income stream that is enhanced by franking.

Importantly when comparing Australian equity returns to global market returns, companies here have higher dividend yields. And it is a historical fact that the Australian equity market has delivered total returns, including dividends, that are above most of the developed world. The following chart from the RBA chart book demonstrates this.

Investing in the Australian equity market, like all equity markets, is not without risk. However, with elevated inflation likely to persist well into 2024, equities will continue to play a key role in delivering on pension focussed long-term income objectives and defend against the impact of inflation.

The surging equity market during Covid was driven by bloated PERs due to excessively low bond yields. Post-Covid, PERs have declined but equity dividend payments have risen, while bonds have entered a third year of negative returns.

 

Will Riggall is CIO of Clime Group, a sponsor of Firstlinks, and oversees the Ralton Dividend Builder, available on several leading platforms and Clime Capital, the group’s listed investment vehicle, has been constructed to deliver a high and growing tax effective dividend stream. The information contained in this article is of a general nature only and is current as at the date of publishing. It does not take into account the goals, objectives, or personal circumstances of any person.

For more articles and papers from Clime, click here.

 

3 Comments
Keith Milera
October 05, 2023

I find it fascinating the contrast between the dividend culture here and the buyback/minimal dividend culture in the US. The US has throttled the Aussie market over the past 20 years, yet Australian has outperformed over 100 years. Which country is right? I suppose it depends on the growth opportunities and there may be more in the US than here at present.

Steve
October 06, 2023

I believe taxes are the driver. Dividends and capital gains are not taxed at the same level in the US and we on the other hand have franking credits on dividends. So the US use profits to buy back shares and provide capital gains (shares are more valuable when you shrink the pool) and we are driven towards dividends because of the value of franking credits.
Personally I get frustrated by the near universal inability of Aussie finance outfits to factor in franking when talking total return. Why not a new term (gross return?) to show the true grossed up returns? It's dead simple maths but few bother. The annoying thing is these people claim to be providing information for more informed decisions but leave out a key component. Given dividends are a massive part of total returns in Australia so franking credits also are a large part which any serious publication would feel compelled to factor in?

Philip Rix
October 09, 2023

Totally agree with Steve’s comments! Franking credits absolutely have value to all (at least Australian resident) Investors when ever dividends are paid. Even non residents shareholders benefit as no withholding tax is applicable when dividends are franked.
‘Yes’, publishing ‘Gross’ returns as suggested makes perfect sense!

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Clime time: Asset allocation decisions for SMSFs

Is FOMO overruling investment basics?

Investing for generations

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.