Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 251

Cuffelinks Newsletter Edition 251

  •   4 May 2018
  •      
  •   

Just when AMP was taking the brunt of the Royal Commission's criticisms and the banks were welcoming a scapegoat, APRA's Prudential Inquiry issued a stinging assessment of the Commonwealth Bank. If the new CEO, Matt Comyn, wanted a catalyst for change, he now has it in spades. The Treasurer, Scott Morrison, jumped on it: 

"The Report, I think, is required reading not only for every institution in the country but, frankly, it should be the next item on the agenda of every single board meeting in this country regardless of whether you're a bank or not."

The Report said CBA's financial success had dulled its senses to a deterioration in the risk profile, especially non-financial risks:

"These risks were neither clearly understood nor owned, the frameworks for managing them were cumbersome and incomplete, and senior leadership was slow to recognise, and address, emerging threats to CBA's reputation." (page 3)

A strange feature of the APRA Report is the repeated identification of executives as 'previous', 'former' and 'new' without naming them. Current staff are generally not blamed for the systemic failures. For example, the Report says:

"There was some evidence at the BRC [Board Risk Committee] that the reputation of the previous Chair of the BRC and CRO as industry experts with a 'scholarly gravitas' stifled the level of challenge at Committee meetings." (page 18)

The previous Chair of the BRC was Harrison Young (who left the Board in November 2017 at the same time as Laura Inman) and previous Chief Risk Officer was Alden Toevs, who left CBA in 2016. Chief Financial Officer David Craig retired in 2017.

APRA's Report is an indictment on the culture created under former CEO, Ian Narev, and former Chair, David Turner. In the Culture and Leadership section, it says:

"Executive Committee members commonly described the 'socratic' questioning style set by the previous CEO leading to some 'decisions being driven by the best debater rather than the person with the most robust position.'" (page 88)

Indeed, how many times have we all seen that? The King is dead, long live the King.
 
Many more Royal Commission seasons to come

The daily broadcast of the Royal Commission is taking a break, and it feels like the end of the football season or completion of binge-watching a series of Fargo. Bring on Season 3. We've seen the removal of villains (taking their booty with them), fainting and ambulances, gold medal performers and shredding of reputations. It's rare to hear a CEO called out in public for lying, as Mark Costello did to Dover's Terry McMaster:

"That's a lie, isn't it? I put it to you it is Orwellian to describe this as a Client Protection Policy. The entire intention of this document is to minimise Dover's liability for the work of its authorised representatives."

And soon after, Terry McMaster collapsed, topping two weeks of high drama.

There has also been much focus on AMP amending the so-called independent report by Clayton Utz. Consultants or regulators commonly offer an opportunity to comment on a draft report, but this is now likely to change. The main issue here is not so much the amending of the report, but passing it off as an independent third party assessment.

The Royal Commission may also be causing a further tightening of mortgage lending conditions. The latest CoreLogic Home Value Index shows combined capital city values had the first annual decline since 2012, although Hobart continue to shine.


Source: CoreLogic Hedonic Home Value Index, April 2018 

This week focusses on financial advice. Jonathan Hoyle gives 15 questions to ask a financial adviser in the wake of the revelations, while John West and Trevor Schuesler check whether advisers have much success selecting fund managers. Daryl Wilson dissects 15 years of S&P data for investment lessons and Vinay Kolhatkar explores the perverse incentives exposed by the Commission.

Back on investing, Anton Tagliaferro emphasises the value of dividends while Adam Kibble offers tips on currency exposure as markets fall. Robert Miller gives three checks when an investor is faced with company earnings downgrades.

In a change of pace, well-known fundie Rob Prugue takes us on his sabbatical walking the 800 kilometre El Camino in Spain, with plenty of twists along the way, and an unexpected plea about how to think about superannuation.

The White Paper from Challenger argues for greater focus on retirement income and advice targetted at the needs of retirees.

Last week's Special 250th Edition ebook on investing mistakes was extremely popular, and is available on the home page of our website for anyone who missed it.

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

 

Edition 251 | 4 May 2018 | Editorial | Newsletter

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.