Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 81

Does your will treat your super fairly?

It is a common strategy to arrange your life insurance through your super fund. The fund can often buy insurance at wholesale rates, and by using salary sacrifice, you can effectively pay the premiums from pre-tax dollars.

Tax on superannuation paid to a non-dependant

But tax may be payable on the proceeds of the policy if it is left to a non-dependant. Often a young single person has, say, $300,000 of death cover through their work super fund. They are unlikely to have dependants for tax purposes, so if they were killed in a car accident the Tax Office would take around $100,000, leaving around $200,000 in their estate.

Where tax is payable by an estate, the tax becomes a general liability of the estate. As a result things can get much more complicated if the deceased is older and the estate does not have the money to pay the tax.

Think about a single father aged 50 with three adult children who all work, and one of them lives at home with him. His house was worth $380,000 in 2008 when his will was drafted. He has $300,000 in super Fund A, and just $15,000 in super Fund B. There is also a $300,000 insurance policy in Fund B – this fund is paying the premiums because it has the smallest balance.

He wanted his will to treat his children equally. Therefore, it was drafted to give the first child the proceeds of Fund A, the second child the proceeds of Fund B and the residue of his estate to child three who was living at home. The father figured that would be the house and the contents and each child would receive roughly the same amount.

Unfortunately, the will drafter did not understand the effect of the death tax on insurance policies held in superannuation.

When the father died suddenly, the children got a terrible shock when they discovered they were not going to be treated equally at all. Ordinarily it would be thought that the first child would receive around $255,000 as the proceeds from Fund A would be taxed at 15%, while the proceeds of the insurance policy held by Fund B would yield approximately $215,000 after the tax of approximately $100,000 was deducted. Life insurance proceeds held within superannuation suffer a much higher tax than ordinary superannuation benefits because they are treated as ‘untaxed’ and are subject to 30% tax (excluding Medicare levy) when paid to a non-dependant.

Problem 1: Super funds do not deduct the death tax and send the balance to the estate. Rather, they send the entire amount to the estate - it is the estate which has the obligation to send the death tax to the ATO.

Problem 2: Because the will specifically gave "the proceeds of Fund A" to the first child and “the proceeds of Fund B” to the second child, they would be entitled to the whole of $300,000 and $315,000 respectively. The tax still has to be paid, but it won’t be coming out of the proceeds received from either of Fund A or Fund B. The executor of the estate has a responsibility of paying $145,000 to the Tax Office ($45,000 death tax on Fund A and $100,000 death tax on Fund B).

Estate left to pay the tax

Because children one and two have received specific bequests, the tax can only be paid out of the residue of the estate. Using a concept known as ‘marshalling’, the executor will probably have to sell the home to pay the $145,000 tax bill leaving child three with net benefits of only $105,000. Not only has the third child borne the cost of the tax payable on both of the superannuation payouts, but the family home has been sold to pay the tax bill.

It is critical that anyone drafting a will understands that all assets are not treated equally for tax purposes. The difference between CGT-free assets like the family home, and investment properties that carry a CGT liability, are generally well known. But few understand the tax treatment of insurance policies held within superannuation, let alone the different tax treatment of the various components arising from contributions made to superannuation funds. As the above example shows, failure to take this tax into account can have disastrous and unforeseen consequences.


Noel Whittaker is the author of Making Money Made Simple and numerous other books on personal finance. His advice is general in nature and readers should seek their own professional advice before making any financial decisions. His website is


Leave a Comment:



Most estate planning for tax is inadequate

Limits to a will’s power over an SMSF

Providing financial assistance to parents


Most viewed in recent weeks

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Welcome to Firstlinks Election Edition 458

At around 10.30pm on Saturday night, Scott Morrison called Anthony Albanese to concede defeat in the 2022 election. As voting continued the next day, it became likely that Labor would reach the magic number of 76 seats to form a majority government.   

  • 19 May 2022

Keep mandatory super pension drawdowns halved

The Transfer Balance Cap limits the tax concessions available in super pension funds, removing the need for large, compulsory drawdowns. Plus there are no requirements to draw money out of an accumulation fund.

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

30 years on, five charts show SMSF progress

On 1 July 1992, the Superannuation Guarantee created mandatory 3% contributions into super for employees. SMSFs were an after-thought but they are now the second-largest segment. How have they changed?

Investment strategies

Anton in 2006 v 2022, it's deja vu (all over again)

What was bothering markets in 2006? Try the end of cheap money, bond yields rising, high energy prices and record high commodity prices feeding inflation. Who says these are 'unprecedented' times? It's 2006 v 2022.


Tips and traps: a final check for your tax return this year

The end of the 2022 financial year is fast approaching and there are choices available to ensure you pay the right amount of tax. Watch for some pandemic-related changes worth understanding.

Financial planning

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.


Listed infrastructure: finding a port in a storm of rising prices

Given the current environment it’s easy to wonder if there are any safe ports in the investment storm. Investments in infrastructure assets show their worth in such times.

Financial planning

Power of attorney: six things you need to know

Whether you are appointing an attorney or have been appointed as an attorney, the full extent of this legal framework should be understood as more people will need to act in this capacity in future.

Interest rates

Rising interest rates and the impact on banks

One of the major questions confronting investors is the portfolio weighting towards Australian banks in an environment of rising rates. Do the recent price falls represent value or are too many bad debts coming?



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.