Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 414

Finding sustainable dividend stocks on the ASX

Rio Tinto (ASX:RIO) has been a top dividend payer on the ASX for years. In 2019 the iron ore miner topped the list, paying 47% more in dividends than second placed Macquarie Group (ASX:MQG).

A year later the miner blew up a 46,000-year-old Aboriginal cave site. The fallout from the Juukan Gorge incident took the Chief Executive and the firm’s Head of Iron Ore with it.

With bond yields still anchored to the ocean floor, dividend payers such as Rio Tinto are a crucial portfolio fixture for income investors. But many reliable payers are in the resources sector and carry high environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks. What can income investors do?

To untangle this Gordian knot, I’ve looked through the Morningstar database to find reliable dividend payers who also meet stringent ESG and carbon risk criteria.

ESG risk ratings measure the economic value at risk from unmanaged environmental, social and governance factors. In the case of Rio, this could range from water pollution to legal action from First Nations groups.

Over 1,300 data points are analysed to give a score which classifies companies on a 5-point scale from ‘Negligible’ to ‘Severe’.

The carbon risk rating focuses on the unmanaged risks to a company's value stemming from the transition to a low carbon economy, through the amount of carbon emissions in its operations, products, services and investments.

To begin, I look for companies that are:

  • Low ESG risk: Classify as ‘Negligible’ or ‘Low’ on both ESG risk and carbon risk
  • Reliable payers: Have at least a 3% trailing 12-month (TTM) dividend yield and five year average dividend yield
  • Fairly valued: Trading in a range Morningstar considers fairly valued.

Real estate investment trusts (REITs) and narrow-moat asset manager Pendal (ASX:PDL) top the list for sustainable dividend yields.

Cromwell Property Group (ASX:CMW) is first, with a distribution yield over the TTM and five year horizons north of 7%. The other REITs on the list are near or above the 5% mark.

Of the five REITs, only Dexus (ASX:DXS) qualifies for a Morningstar narrow moat, implying a 10-year competitive advantage.

Sustainable picks based on historic dividend/distribution performance – fairly valued

Source: Morningstar Direct. Data as of 22 June. While similar to a dividend, REITs technically pay a distribution.

Beyond the REITs: G8 Education, Sydney Airport, and IRESS

Australia's largest private childcare operator G8 Education (ASX:GEM) and narrow-moat Sydney Airport (ASX:SYD) are options for those looking outside the REIT sector.

G8 Education and Sydney Airport meet the sustainability criteria and have a five year average dividend yield greater than 4%. Neither has paid a dividend since COVID hit, but Morningstar analysts expect both to provide a dividend yield in excess of 4% in 2022. G8 Education is currently trading at a 53% discount to its fair value estimate.

If the net is widened to stocks Morningstar considers somewhat overvalued, investors can consider narrow-moat toll-operator Atlas Arteria (ASX:ALX) or narrow-moat financial software provider IRESS (ASX:IRE). They are trading at an 11% and 19% premium to fair value, respectively.

Sustainable picks based on historic dividend performance - premium to fair value

Source: Morningstar Direct. Data as of 22 June.

Future dividend payers

Past performance is no guarantee of future result, so I’ve included those companies that Morningstar analysts estimate will have a dividend/distribution yield greater than 3% in 2022.

The list includes three more REITs, as well as Southern Cross Media (ASX:SXL). The latter has not paid a dividend since September 2019 and closed at a 43% discount to fair value.

Sustainable firms estimated to pay a dividend yield greater than 3% in 2022 - fairly valued

Source: Morningstar Direct. Data as of 22 June. While similar to a dividend, REITs technically pay a distribution.

 

Lewis Jackson is a reporter/data journalist at Morningstar, owner of Firstlinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

A Morningstar Premium free trial is available on the link below, including access to the portfolio management service, Sharesight.


Try Morningstar Premium for free


 

10 Comments
Trevor
August 09, 2021

Would have thought CLW would be preferable to GPT. I own both and I know which is helping my retirement most!

James
August 09, 2021

CHC is better than both!

Steve
July 04, 2021

One that slips under the radar is IVE Group (IGL). It has moved out of ASX 300 but dividends have now resumed as per pre-pandemic levels and is still attractive dividend-wise with an increasing share price (recovery and on market buyback).

bluey
July 02, 2021

Yes, good food for thought. I did think about this dilemma a few years ago, but decided instead to hang on to RIO and buy an electric car with the dividends [truly], some $21.50 per share over the last 3yrs. I'm sure RIO will straighten its ways going forward.

Lorraine Shackell
July 01, 2021

I bought G8 in April 2016 for $3.90 and sold In June this year for $1.036. What I received in dividends in that period certainly didn't cover the difference in those two prices. Definitely not one of my better buys.

Graeme
June 30, 2021

Yes, why?

Niki
June 30, 2021

I don't believe G8 is a good stock.

Ken
June 30, 2021

Why?

Tom Harbrow
June 30, 2021

Downside is it is in an area that can be trashed / elevated by government policy, upside is current price, further upside is that any government trashing this sector wont last long (held) Tom

Warren Bird
June 30, 2021

I'd also ask, in the context of this article, 'so what?' The article wasn't recommending or predicting long term total return performance of these stocks, it was simply outlining how to go about searching for good ESG rated, dividend paying stocks. Whether that's a good enough investment process or not is another matter, but the article is merely one piece of a bigger puzzle.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

What are the key trends in global dividend income?

How to use debt recycling to your advantage

The secrets of Australia’s Berkshire Hathaway

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.