Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 616

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

  •   ASFA
  •   18 June 2025
  • 11
  •      
  •   

The Federal Government has proposed reducing the concession paid on earnings in superannuation accounts holding more than $3 million dollars. The worked examples below show how the tax is calculated for a range of different superannuation account holders.

The examples below are for illustration purposes only and based on current information about the proposed tax as at 5 June 2025. The table below summarises the figures in the examples.

Joan, a retiree with account-based pensions

In the 2025–26 income year Joan received benefit payments of $250,000 combined from her two pension accounts and made a $300,000 downsizer contribution. On 30 June 2025 Joan’s Total Superannuation Balance (TSB) was $3.7 million and $4.1 million on 30 June 2026.

Joan’s adjusted TSB at the end of the year is calculated to be $4.05 million by adding her total withdrawals of $250,000 and deducting her total contributions of $300,000 from her 2025–26 TSB of $4.1 million. Her superannuation earnings for the year are $350,000 (the difference between $4.05 million and $3.7 million).

The percentage of taxable earnings over $3 million is calculated by subtracting $3 million from $4.1 million and then dividing it by $4.1 million, resulting in a percentage of earnings attributable to the balance over $3 million of 26.83%.

The Division 296 tax amount is calculated by first multiplying the superannuation earnings of $350,000 by 26.83%, which is $93,905. That amount is then multiplied by the 15% tax rate, leading to a Division 296 tax amount of $14,085.75. This is a relatively small proportion – approximately 4% – of the overall superannuation earnings of $350,000.

Jill, not currently working, aged 55

On 30 June 2025 Jill’s Total Superannuation Balance (TSB) was $3.0 million and $3.1 million on 30 June 2026.

Her superannuation earnings for the year are $100,000 (the difference between $3.1 million and $3.0 million).

The percentage of taxable earnings over $3 million is calculated by subtracting $3 million from $3.1 million and then dividing it by $3.1 million, resulting in a percentage of earnings attributable to the balance over $3 million of 3.23%.

The Division 296 tax amount is calculated by first multiplying the superannuation earnings of $100,000 by 3.236%, which is $3,230. That amount is then multiplied by the 15% tax rate, leading to a Division 296 tax amount of $485.

John, an employee who has not retired

In the 2025–26 income year John had total employer contributions totalling $25,000 after deduction of the 15% contribution tax. On 30 June 2025 John’s Total Superannuation Balance (TSB) was $3.2 million and $3.4 million on 30 June 2026.

John’s adjusted TSB at the end of the year is calculated to be $3.375 million by deducting his total contributions of $25,000 from his 30 June 2026 TSB of $3.4 million. His superannuation earnings for the year are $175,000 (the difference between $3.375 million and $3.2 million).

The percentage of taxable earnings over $3 million is calculated by subtracting $3 million from $3.4 million and then dividing it by $3.4 million, resulting in a percentage of earnings attributable to the balance over $3 million of 11.76%.

The Division 296 tax amount is calculated by first multiplying the superannuation earnings of $175,000 by 11.76%, which is $20,580. That amount is then multiplied by the 15% tax rate, leading to a Division 296 tax amount of $3,087. This is a relatively small proportion – less than 2% – of the overall superannuation earnings of $175,000.

Harry, self-employed and not retired

On 30 June 2025 Harry’s Total Superannuation Balance (TSB) was $5 million and $5.5 million on 30 June 2026.

Harry made no contributions and had no withdrawals from his super, so the superannuation earnings for the purpose of the tax are $500,000, the difference between the two figures.

The percentage of taxable earnings over $3 million is calculated by subtracting $3 million from $5.5 million and then dividing it by $5.5 million, resulting in a percentage of earnings attributable to the balance over $3 million of 45.45%.

The Division 296 tax amount is calculated by first multiplying the superannuation earnings of $500,000 by 45.45%, which is $227,250. That amount is then multiplied by the 15% tax rate, leading to a Division 296 tax amount of $34,088.

Fred the retired farmer

Fred has retired from farming. His children continue the farming business, paying rent to the Self-Managed Super Fund (SMSF) which holds the property as an investment asset.

Fred’s account in the SMSF has an investment portfolio represented by the $3 million value of the farm, together with shares and bank deposits. His total superannuation balance as at 30 June 2025 is $3.8 million. The fund receives rent in 2025–26 at a yield of 4% on the opening value of the land, which equates to $120,000. The SMSF is required to charge a commercial rent for the farming land. Rent is a set amount and does not vary with the profitability (up or down) of the farming business.

Interest and dividends amount to $60,000 a year. Fred draws down at the minimum required rate for his age (70), so his benefit payment is $190,000 in 2025–26. Even in the absence of any Division 296 tax the fund needs to have access to cash to pay the minimum required drawdown.

At 30 June 2026 the value of his interest in the farm has increased by 10% to $3.3 million. The total value of his interest in the SMSF is $4.1 million.

Fred’s adjusted TSB at the end of the year is calculated to be $4.29 million by adding his total withdrawals of $190,000. His superannuation earnings for the year are $490,000 (the difference between $4.29 million and $3.8 million).

The percentage of taxable earnings over $3 million is calculated by subtracting $3 million from $4.1 million and then dividing it by $4.1 million, resulting in a percentage of earnings attributable to the balance over $3 million of 26.83%.

The Division 296 tax amount is calculated by first multiplying the superannuation earnings of $490,000 by 26.83%, which is $131,467. That amount is then multiplied by the 15% tax rate, leading to a Division 296 tax amount of $19,720. This is approximately 4% of the overall superannuation earnings of $490,000 and around 10% of the otherwise tax-free payment he received from superannuation.

Pedro, retired male MP

Pedro retired from Parliament in May 2025 after many years of service, including as a Minister and Shadow Minister. Due to his date of entry to Parliament he qualifies for a defined benefit pension which he started to receive from May 2025. He has informed the fund trustee that he has a spouse. He is aged 55 as at 30 June 2025.

In the 2025–26 income year Pedro received benefit payments of $250,000.

The trustee of the fund has used the Family Law valuation method to determine a Total Superannuation Balance (TSB) of $5,985,450 on 30 June 2025 and a closing balance of $6,070,560 as at 30 June 2026. The closing balance reflects a lower valuation factor due to the member being one year older but there is also an increase in the benefit paid, which for the purpose of this illustration is indexed by growth in average earnings of 3.5%.

Pedro’s adjusted TSB at the end of the year is calculated to be $6,320,560 by adding his total withdrawals of $250,000. His calculated superannuation earnings for the year are $335,110 (the difference between $6,320,560 and $5,985,450).

The percentage of taxable earnings over $3 million is calculated by subtracting $3 million from $6,070,560 and then dividing it by $6,070,560, resulting in a percentage of earnings attributable to the balance over $3 million of 50.58%.

The Division 296 tax amount is calculated by first multiplying the superannuation earnings of $335,110 by 50.58%, which is $169,498. That amount is then multiplied by the 15% tax rate, leading to a Division 296 tax amount of $25,425 from $335,110 in earnings.

Patricia, retired female MP

Patricia also retired from Parliament in May 2025 after many years of service, including as a Minister, Shadow Minister and Committee Chair. Due to her date of entry to Parliament she qualifies for a defined benefit pension which she started to receive from May 2025. She has informed the fund trustee that she has a same-sex spouse. She is aged 55 at 30 June 2025.In the 2025–26 income year Patricia received benefit payments of $250,000.

The trustee of the fund has used the Family Law valuation method to determine a Total Superannuation Balance (TSB) of $6,076,075 on 30 June 2025 and a closing balance of $6,288,737 as at 30 June 2026. The closing balance reflects both a lower valuation factor due to the member being one year older and also an increase in the benefit paid (to $258,750), which for the purpose of this illustration is indexed by growth in average earnings of 3.5%.

The Family Law valuations use gender-based factors, reflecting longer life expectancy for women. A higher valuation also applies when there is a spouse, because of the reversionary pension paid on the death of the primary recipient. The valuation factors assume a spouse is of the opposite gender. It is also not clear whether the factors apply to a person based on their gender at birth or the gender they currently identify with.

Patricia’s adjusted TSB at the end of the year is calculated to be $6,538,737 by adding her total withdrawals of $250,000 to the closing balance. Her calculated superannuation earnings for the year are $462,562 (the difference between $6,538,737 and $6,076,075).

The percentage of taxable earnings over $3 million is calculated by subtracting $3 million from $6,288,737 and then dividing it by $6,288,737, resulting in a percentage of earnings attributable to the balance over $3 million of 52.29%.

The Division 296 tax amount is calculated by first multiplying the superannuation earnings of $462,562 by 52.29%, which is $241,873. That amount is then multiplied by the 15% tax rate, leading to a Division 296 tax amount of $36,281 – around 14% of the pension received.

The Division 296 tax payable by Patricia is about 45% more than the tax payable by Pedro, even though they receive the same pension payment. This is due to the use of gender-based valuation factors. The calculated investment earnings are higher and a greater amount of the account balance is over $3 million. In submissions on the valuation methods ASFA has advocated for the same valuation factors to apply to males and females for both the primary and reversionary beneficiaries.

 

ASFA represents the APRA regulated superannuation industry with over 100 organisations as members from corporate, industry, retail and public sector funds, and service providers. We develop policy positions through collaboration with our diverse membership base and use our deep technical expertise and research capabilities to assist in advancing outcomes for Australians.

 

11 Comments
dauf
June 20, 2025

Just negotiate a max amount you can have in super….and the excess out each year after 30 June tax reconciliation. Simple. The money is then invested elsewhere and/or wasted in more Australian housing. The real question is ‘what is a fair amount for people to have as a maximum amount in super with its tax concessions?’

I reckon 2 times the transfer balance (which is indexed sort of) which would allow the transfer balance amount even following a 50% crash in stocks.

Simple’s and fair to avoid taxpayers funding extreme wealth tax free

OldbutSane
June 20, 2025

Where can you easily work out the Family Law value of a CSS pension?

Old super hand
June 20, 2025

Not easy to find, but there is a legislative instrument made under the authority of the Family Law Regulations which sets out the scheme specific factors that have been approved for the various Commonwealth schemes
https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2025L00281/asmade/text/2

MinorityGroup
June 20, 2025

I have been asking a similar question, what is the calculation for a CSS pension?
CSS and the tax department don't know.
So if anyone knows please post it here, even the family law formula would help more than the 16 times figure.
Thanks OldbutSane for the post.

Old super hand
June 20, 2025

It is on the CSC site if you know where to look. Not every call centre person would know to go to the particular page and look at Step 2.
https://www.csc.gov.au/members/manage-super/Your-home-and-family/Separation-and-Divorce

PeterJS
June 19, 2025

Thanks for the examples. Hard to understand the reaction to this being so strong when it is such a small part of gains. There is always the option to take it out of super and see if you can effect a lower tax rate. There are structural changes required to balance the fed budget and such a small change seems reasonable. I also thought the article by Harry Chernay was very well balanced. https://www.firstlinks.com.au/case-for-the-3-million-dollar-super-tax

Chris
June 19, 2025

You have calculated earnings @ around 6% pa. This seems to be on the low side, just above fixed term deposit. If SMSF's were getting this sort of return it's hardly worth running your own SMSF. Most self directed SMSF investors I know are targeting 9 % to 13% capital return and 4% to 5% dividends. So somewhere around 13% to 18%. I would like to see the figures redone with varying rates of return, Division 296 tax is significant, especially if you calculate unrealised gains over 10 year period with CAGR of 15%. Do the calculation, it's frightening how much division 296 tax you will pay. It also significantly reduces the compounding of your SMSF. I am totally against the tax in its present form.

CC
June 19, 2025

I have seen many calculations on how much to pay, but only limited to the first year of implementation. I wonder how it will work for subsequent years. Assuming for year 2025/2026, the TSB was $3M on 30 Jun 2025, and $3.2M on 30 Jun 2026, the 15% tax was paid. Again, assuming for year 2026/2027, the TSB on 30Jun 2027 was $3.2M, despite fluctuations during the year. Do I have to pay the 15% tax? Note that there was no change in the year for the TSB, but above the $3M threshold. Thanks in advance for clarifications from experts.

Doris
June 19, 2025

Div 296 tax is based on "earnings" - which is essentially based on the difference in TSB between the start and end of the year. Assuming there were no contributions or withdrawals made during the year, and you ended up with the same TSB of $3.2m at the beginning and end of the year, your earnings would be $3.2m - $3.2m = Nil. As a result, there would be no Div 296 tax to pay. However, if you only ended up back at $3.2m because you received $200,000 in pension payments during the year, those payments get added back into the end of year (adjusted) TSB figure. So your earnings would then be $3.4m-$3.2m = $200,000. As per above, you then calculate the taxable portion of the earnings as ($3.2m - $3m)/3.2m = 6.25% x $200,000 = $12,500. The tax is then $12,500 x .15 = $1,875.

Ian
June 19, 2025

Can we please not using the word "earnings", because it disguises what's really going on here

James
June 19, 2025

On idiocy, complexity and discrimination alone this tax is a very ugly pig wearing lipstick! Thanks for the worked examples though!

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

How to prevent excessive superannuation balances

20k now or 50k later? What’s driving decisions to withdraw super?

Keating versus Hume: where willy-nilly meets obscene

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Latest Updates

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Superannuation

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

Have Apple and Google reached the beginning of the end?

It might be hard to imagine a world where Apple and Google aren’t dominant, but disruption often starts with tiny cracks. AI's emergence into the mainstream might have set the stage for a new generation of leaders.

Superannuation

Did retirees lose out when they accepted defined benefit schemes?

Defined benefit pensions were designed to offer security in retirement. But new tax policies and arbitrary limits now erode their value - especially for Australians who contributed their own savings to these plans.

Property

Why Australia's agricultural land boom has stalled

Farmland prices have flatlined, bringing one of the most dramatic rural property cycles in Australian history to an end. The market for agricultural land now seems to be entering a new and more nuanced phase.

Property

The retail property niche offering income and growth

Neighbourhood shopping centres have fought off one perceived threat after another. What's more, they continue to offer secure income from blue-chip firms and other tenants linked mostly to essential spending.

ASX plans to attract more IPOs don’t go far enough

High-profile Australian stock market listings, like Guzman Y Gomez's IPO in 2024, are rare. ASIC aims to streamline the IPO process to boost listings, but faces barriers like share structures and governance.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.