Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 343

What’s the outlook for global small companies?

Local investors have a good appetite for Australian small- and medium-cap companies, but there’s a huge universe of global companies in this category that are also worth considering.

We classify global small and mid-cap (SMID) companies as those with a market capitalisation from US$1 billion to US$28 billion (A$41 billion). They are vastly larger than the types of companies considered SMID in Australia. This approach to global SMID ensures an investible universe of diversified, liquid and highly profitable stocks. Some of the most interesting companies with the strongest franchises are found in the global SMID sector and include luxury car brand Ferrari; PoolCorp, the largest wholesale distributor of swimming pool supplies in the world; US beauty store chain Ulta Beauty; and Moncler, which sells down jackets and other clothes.

There are many differences when it comes to the Australian versus global SMID market. For instance, size is one of the advantages of the global universe versus its Australian counterpart. The global cohort is much larger, more liquid and companies tend to be of a higher quality.

Additionally, it’s much easier to find companies with the potential to generate value among overseas businesses. Because of the larger universe of opportunities, allocating large amounts of capital to global SMID is also more straightforward than allocating funds to Australian small caps.

Another reason to consider global SMID is because global equities portfolios have changed in recent years. In the world of global equities, it’s no secret that large-cap growth stocks, especially the giant tech stocks, have accounted for much of the recent gains in equities. As such, many portfolios have become more heavily-skewed towards the larger cap end of the market. This is opening up opportunities to invest in the global SMID to gain exposure to a big part of the global equity market that can provide growth.

Managing valuation risk 

At a time when valuations in global large-cap stocks and are hitting new highs, global SMID looks increasingly attractive. When compared to the Australian small-cap market (the S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries Index), the global SMID cap index is actually less expensive – the MSCI World SMID Cap Index P/E at 18.6 vs the S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries Index P/E at 19.7x vs its five-year average of 16.4.

Furthermore, the global SMID universe simply has not participated in the valuation expansion that has been so prevalent with large-cap global growth and IT names. The MSCI World Global SMID Cap Index is now trading at its lowest P/E premium to the MSCI World Index in 10 years (+7.8% vs +15.6% 10-year average), which is in stark contrast to the global IT sector, which trades at a 33% premium to the rest of the market.

Absolute and relative P/E of the MSCI World SMID Index over 10 years.

Source: Bloomberg.

An allocation to global SMID also offers a much better value proposition than mega cap names that have driven markets in recent years i.e. Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook and Alphabet. The valuation risk in these names has grown as their average P/E now sits at 29x and their average P/E premium to the market sits at 89%.

Three themes to watch 

Three themes emerged during Bell Asset Management’s recent global research visit.

First, the strength of the US labour market. In 2019, more than 2.1 million extra people gained employment. As the market tightens, a lack of skilled labour and labour availability is emerging as a challenge for US businesses. This bodes well for the US economy this year and the small to medium-cap companies in it.

Second, according to official Chinese data, economic growth is running at 6%, but anecdotal evidence suggests this figure could be much lower. This is a risk to watch in 2020, one that could have flow-on effects to European economies in particular.

The outbreak of the coronavirus in China represents yet another challenge for their economy. While the bulk of the near-term pain will clearly be felt domestically, the ramifications for global businesses with meaningful China exposure are quickly becoming apparent. Some of the larger global players in the luxury, restaurant, travel and tech industries have already flagged that earnings will suffer.

From an asset allocation perspective, the coronavirus has highlighted the inherent risks in two of the best known 'growth sleeves' in global equities – large cap growth (valuation risk) and emerging markets (macro and earnings risk). It also highlights two compelling attributes of the global SMID asset class: they come with meaningfully less valuation risk, and as companies domiciled in developed markets, they tend to be more domestically-focused.

Third, a related theme is the US/China trade war and global capex spending, which has been on hold since February 2019. Investors have been looking for some pent-up demand in capex spending to stimulate economic growth, especially in Europe. But our research suggests this is not yet happening. Capex plans are still on pause, although this may change as the US and China have recently come to some resolutions around the trade war.

Markets have recovered since reaching a nadir in January 2019. While there are concerns about how much further they could rise, we believe they still have some way to run. Brexit’s resolution, which could prompt an uptick in economic growth, is one reason for this. The US job market’s strength is another signal markets could outperform in 2020. Time will tell how these themes play out and how they will affect global small and mid-cap companies.

 

Ned Bell is Chief Investment Officer and Portfolio Manager at Bell Asset Management, a Channel Capital partner. Channel Capital is a sponsor of Firstlinks. This information should not be considered advice or a recommendation to investors or potential investors in relation to holding, purchasing or selling particular assets and does not take into account your particular investment objectives, financial situation or needs.

For more articles and papers from Channel Capital and partners, click here.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

Six COVID opportunist stocks prospering in adversity

A game plan for managing volatility in global equities

How to unlock the big opportunity in misunderstood small caps

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.