Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 477

What the Queen taught us about longevity

A reasonable amount has been written and said about the Queen in recent weeks and that’s appropriate given her pivotal position in Britain’s sense of identity. I have nothing original or inspiring to add about the former monarch, but I have been thinking about staying power, longevity and the power of time.

One of the biggest issues with saving and investing is knowing how long you’re going to live. When you're young you can't conceive of being old or living until you're 100.

Uncertain life expectancy

Retirement planning would be so much easier if you had a fixed date to work with (or even a ballpark figure). Life expectancy figures, genetics, luck (good and bad), illness and wealth are all powerful variables that actuaries blend together.

You could live for the average life expectancy (currently 83.8 years in Australia). In this context, starting investing at say 21 when you leave study – if that’s the path you’ve chosen – you could have 60+ years to build a retirement portfolio and other assets. Living longer is ideal for many reasons, in that your loved ones get to spend more time with you (my grandparents, who were born two years before the Queen, received a message from her on their platinum wedding anniversary and met their great-grandchildren).

Illness and poor health later in life is the obvious drawback to living longer, especially if that carefully accumulated capital has to be plundered to fund health and social care. We had news recently that French film director Jean-Luc Godard, died at the age of 91 through assisted suicide in Switzerland after battling multiple illnesses.

The Queen (and her mother, who made it to 101) were outliers for her generation in terms of age but her father, George VI, died age 56. Death makes fools of statisticians and actuaries: how can you plan for a difference of around 50 years in lifespan? The royals naturally have less to worry about financial planning than most people.

Saving by saving and how it works

Let's look at the maths of saving. Compound interest is powerful, especially over a multi-decade time period of 50 years plus. People tend to underestimate the impact of reinvested interest. Look at how much of an impact the price of a coffee can make, if you invested it instead. If you're spending $3 a day on coffee, that's roughly $90 a month. If invested with an average return of 6% a year for 40 years, that would create $178,252 for your future self. 

The below table shows how our savings would accumulate if you started with $100 in your savings account and added an extra $100 at the end of every year.

Interest rate

1 Year

5 Years

10 Years

15 Years

20 Years

30 Years

50 Years

70 Years

3%

203

647

1,281

2,016

2,868

5,000

11,718

23,851

5%

205

680

1,421

2,366

3,572

7,076

22,082

61,895

7%

207

715

1,578

2,789

4,487

10,207

43,599

172,812

10%

210

772

1,853

3,595

6,400

18,194

128,130

867,722

15%

215

875

2,435

5,572

11,881

50,096

830,137

13,596,719

20%

220

993

3,215

8,744

22,503

141,926

5,459,763

209,332,874

Even if your savings only provide a 3% interest on an annualised basis, in 30 years, you’ll have $5,000 in your account. Without interest, you’d have $3,100 set aside. Of course, these are future dollars, not adjusted for inflation.

If you did save for the length of the Queen’s reign, an astonishing 70 years, that’s $23,851 at 3%. If the annualised return is upped to 5%, your account will jump to $61,895. And, if in the probably unlikely scenario that you are Warren Buffett, earning 20% annually but still only investing $100 a year, over 70 years, you will have $209,332,874 in your savings. That's over two hundred million dollars. Even with the impact of inflation, taxes, fees, etc, that will be a lot of money.

Staying power

Apart from high-quality medical supervision, the Queen had relatively little control over her longevity. The nature of her role meant she would be monarch for the duration of her life. Politicians and even fund managers rarely have that much time to make an impact, given the harsh realities of commerce and governance, although asset manager abdrn Plc, Harry Nimmo, manager of a gold-rated UK smaller companies funds, retired from the firm after 38 years. Baillie Gifford’s James Anderson, famed for his role as Scottish Mortgage Trust manager (alongside Tom Slater), also spent a similar amount of time at the firm and built a similar legacy and loyal investor fan base.

While there’s a correlation between fund manager staying power and performance, the comparison with politicians could be unfair. Cabinet ministers and even the prime minister would no doubt like a 20 or 30 year run, but it’s expected that they have shorter shelf lives than money managers. Politicians don’t need to be an expert in their subject to become a secretary of state, and rarely do they stay long enough to make a significant impact.

You are not going to be the next monarch (unless Prince William is reading this), but what you may have – but don’t realise it yet – is time. The latest generation of investors, born in 2022, could easily make it to the Queen’s age and beyond. That means that even without generous parents investing on your behalf from day one, you could have a potential 50+ year run at the investing game. 

Spend, spend, spend - or save, save, save

Even if you are financially fortunate enough to set aside funds for long-term investment each year, you will need money for education, property, children, holidays, health care, cars and more. The pandemic may have even engendered a 'what the hell' attitude among some savers – if a virus could take you off unexpectedly, why not spend and enjoy? At the opposite end of the spectrum is the FIRE (Financial Independence, Retire Early) movement, which requires self-sacrifices that most are unwilling or unable to make.

Poet Philip Larkin, who died at the age of 63, was right about our inability to think beyond the everyday and comprehend glacial time:

“We're not suited to the long perspectives / Open at each instant of our lives.”

Still, times like these allow people to reflect on longevity and contemplate 'long perspectives'. From the Queen’s birth in 1926, the S&P 500 has returned an average of double digits per annum with dividends reinvested, and that stretch has included the Great Depression, World War 2, the oil crisis, the fall of the Soviet empire, 9/11 and GFC and a pandemic.

 

James Gard is Senior Editor for Morningstar.co.uk. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor. Minor modifications have been made for an Australian audience.

 

Access data and research on over 40,000 securities through Morningstar Investor, as well as a portfolio manager integrated with Australia’s leading portfolio tracking service, Sharesight. Sign up to a free, four week trial below:


Try Morningstar Investor for free


 

  •   28 September 2022
  • 3
  •      
  •   
3 Comments
Steve
September 28, 2022

Plus not having to pay Inheritance Tax/Death Duties on your family billions helps immensely

Kevin
September 28, 2022

Oh dear,the compounding can of worms is open again.Time is money.I don't think people understand time or compounding.I do compounding calculations whenever I buy a company,get it roughly right.What people don't have time for is a 30 second rough compounding calculation.An entire lifetime and not 30 seconds to spare.

In an entire lifetime they have all the time in the world to think of the name of a company that went bust.

They have all the time in the world to say say ,nah,put it on red at the casino.

They have all the time in the world to say " how come everybody else isn't doing that"

They have all the time in the world to get it precisely wrong to 3 decimal places.

They have all the time in the world to repeat Buffett quotes,hold good companies forever.Then contradict themselves in the next words ,rebalance,that is important.

They have all the time in the world for tax reformation,negative gearing,stop that,franking credits,stop that.They have no time to actually find out what they are.

All companies I compound at doubling the shareholding every 14 to 15 years.Reinvest the interest ( called dividends).Share price compounds at 6% CAGR over the long term. .
For CBA the 6% was too low,so I changed it to 7%.You'll never meet a thrill seeker like me. This worked out at after 100 years 128,000 shares in CBA.Starting from a base of 1000 shares..

The price,well the base was $6 a share,so $6000.After growth over 100 years the end price is $6144.Rounded this means $786 million.The reason I don't believe or repeat the saving mantra.

Obviously they have all time in the world to try to make investing complicated.Complication must make it better,or does it? They have no time at all to do nothing .

You try and tell the young people of today that.Or for that matter you try and tell the old people of today that.

Time is money,what the hell does that mean.

Kevin
September 30, 2022

For those that didn't see it,which is normal.Those that refuse to see it, which is even more normal ,then the CBA shareholder update in Feb of this year and last year's Wesfarmers annual report show long term results.

Concentrate on the WES report,$1000 worth of shares when listed in 1984 compounded to $669K by 30/6/21.A far better return than I would have compounded it at.I didn't buy them until the late 1990s.

CBA also compounded faster than I calculated,both on number of shares using the DRP and on the share price.

On 30/6/21 you had roughly 11000 shares in WES,@ $60 each.I would double the shareholding in WES over the next 15 years from that date.So in 2036 you have 22000 shares in WES at whatever the price is.In 2036 there will still be people that refuse to see it and deny it.Probability is they will survive,that is very important .There is a chance they may go under,anytime you want you can sell them.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Two factors that can transform retirement investing

Buy high, sell low: early super access and foregone returns

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.