Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 418

Two factors that can transform retirement investing

The rally in Australian shares in 2021 and forecasts of rising house and other asset prices suggest good times are back for investors. That might be true for growth investors seeking capital gains, but for income investors who live off their portfolio’s yield, times have never been tougher.

Many conservative Australian investors face the biggest problem ever seen in markets, with record-low interest rates punishing savers and distorting asset valuations. Nobody is more affected by low rates than retirees.

Declining income for retirees

In dollar terms, a pre-GFC retiree with $1.25 million in term deposits could generate around $103,000 of risk-free annual income without touching their capital, based on a term deposit rate of 8.25%. Today, the same retiree can generate only $3,125 of income from that investment, based on a term deposit rate of around 0.25%.

Worse, a retired couple today would need around $25 million invested in cash to fund a comfortable standard of living at the current average term deposit rate of around 0.25% based on the the Association of Australian Superannuation Funds (ASFA) Retirement Standard of $62,828 for a retired couple who want a 'comfortable lifestyle'. Retirees who invested the bulk of their savings in cash and term deposits in the past decade could have suffered immense financial damage (in real terms). Sadly, many retirees have adapted to lower returns by downgrading their living standards.

Our industry should not accept this. Nobody wants retirees investing most of their savings in cash and term deposits because they are fearful of either losing or running out of their money.

Two changes required

I believe two behavioural shifts could improve retirement investing and enhance living standards for many older Australians.

The first is financial advice. Our industry must encourage more retirees to seek financial advice much earlier in their investing journey. We know that Australians who have financial advice are in a significantly better position than those who go it alone, yet only about one in five people who planned to retire last year was likely to pay for financial advice, according to the Financial Planning Association. This means about 351,000 Australians (of approximately 438,000 who planned to retire) will not pay for financial advice (Retirement and Retirement Intentions, Australia. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2018-19).

The result? Too many unadvised retirees will park the bulk of their savings in cash and term deposits and earn a negative return (after inflation). Some retirees will automatically roll over term deposits year after year, even though cash returns are falling. Or worse, make major asset-allocation shifts after a market shock – such as moving entirely to cash after the GFC – and never returning to markets because they fear sharemarket volatility.

The second change relates to how advisers build the defensive component of portfolios in retirement. In a low rate environment, with an aging population, the traditional 60/40 model of portfolio allocation is on life support.

Consider a portfolio with 60% in growth assets and 40% in defensive assets. The current, very low returns from defensive assets means that 40% of the portfolio is simply not earning enough return. If a retiree is then drawing down on a pension of 4, 5, 6 or 7% p.a., they could be going backwards. In this scenario, there is a strong argument to introduce more growth assets.

But with growth assets comes greater volatility. According to Callan Associates research, for investors to earn a 7.5% return 30 years ago, they could have done so with no exposure to growth assets and a standard deviation of 3.1%. In 2019, to earn that same return, the exposure to growth is set at 96% with the standard deviation skyrocketing to 18%.

According to Callan, retirees are about five times more loss averse than the average investor. To increase returns in this environment, investors may be taking bets on the defensive side of the portfolio, increasing duration, credit risk or other risks within portfolios. But in many cases, this makes the assets more akin to growth and subject to significant volatility.

The question then becomes: “How can the 40% in defensive work harder to deliver greater returns without excessive risk?”

The need for a protected retirement product

Protected retirement products are not just for growth allocations in portfolios. Increasingly, advisers are using such products as a sleeve in a portfolio’s defensive allocation. Of course, that is only part of the answer in a low-rate environment. Protection strategies are not risk free and can involve long-term products that discourage individuals from withdrawing their investment early.

For example, by using a protection strategy with a 0% floor (that is, zero loss tolerance), a retiree could earn a maximum potential return of 2.55% p.a. with a maximum downside of -0.8% p.a. (the fee on the structure) in the defensive allocation.

(This example is based on a Allianz Retire+ Future Safe seven-year investment interval, 0% floor, 50/50 investment into S&P/ASX 200 Total Return (3.50% cap) and MSCI World Net in AUD (3.20% cap) indexed at June 2021. Net of 0.80% pa fee.*)

The product is designed to be held for the full term although it enables investors access to income (liquidity), either through regular or ad hoc withdrawals, up to a free withdrawal amount. The free withdrawal amount is 5% of the initial investment from year 2, the total credited or debited to the account during the previous policy year (net of any applicable tax), where interest is greater than zero, as shown in the diagram below.

Withdrawals above the free withdrawal amount are permitted but are subject to a market value adjustment.

Research consistently shows retirees want better returns than those currently on offer but they have limited appetite to dial up their risk exposure in order to achieve it. Most of all, retirees want to sleep easy at night, knowing their savings won’t run out when they need it most. That requires an element of certainty and protection, but financial advisers have had few such tools available to provide this. Previous protection products were too costly, complex or required too much upside to be given away.

Change is coming. A potential extra 1-2% return each year on portfolios compounds over time.


Caitriona Wortley is Head of Distribution at Allianz Retire+. This material is for general information purposes only. It is not comprehensive or intended to give financial product advice and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs.

*This example uses past-performance data, which is not a reliable indicator of future performance and is no guarantee of future returns. The returns on the Future Safe product issued by Allianz Australia Life Insurance Limited ABN 27 076 033 782, AFSL 296559 (Allianz Retire+) which are used in this example are subject to a number of variables including investor elections, market performance and other external factors, and may differ from this example. Investors should consider the Product Disclosure Statement (PDS) which is available on (



Guess what? It may actually be different this time

7-point checklist for managing the uncertain timing of death

How much super is enough?


Most viewed in recent weeks

Is it better to rent or own a home under the age pension?

With 62% of Australians aged 65 and over relying at least partially on the age pension, are they better off owning their home or renting? There is an extra pension asset allowance for those not owning a home.

Too many retirees miss out on this valuable super fund benefit

With 700 Australians retiring every day, retirement income solutions are more important than ever. Why do millions of retirees eligible for a more tax-efficient pension account hold money in accumulation?

Is the fossil fuel narrative simply too convenient?

A fund manager argues it is immoral to deny poor countries access to relatively cheap energy from fossil fuels. Wealthy countries must recognise the transition is a multi-decade challenge and continue to invest.

Reece Birtles on selecting stocks for income in retirement

Equity investing comes with volatility that makes many retirees uncomfortable. A focus on income which is less volatile than share prices, and quality companies delivering robust earnings, offers more reassurance.

Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Comparing generations and the nine dimensions of our well-being

Using the nine dimensions of well-being used by the OECD, and dividing Australians into Baby Boomers, Generation Xers or Millennials, it is surprisingly easy to identify the winners and losers for most dimensions.

Latest Updates


Superannuation: a 30+ year journey but now stop fiddling

Few people have been closer to superannuation policy over the years than Noel Whittaker, especially when he established his eponymous financial planning business. He takes us on a quick guided tour.

Survey: share your retirement experiences

All Baby Boomers are now over 55 and many are either in retirement or thinking about a transition from work. But what is retirement like? Is it the golden years or a drag? Do you have tips for making the most of it?


Time for value as ‘promise generators’ fail to deliver

A $28 billion global manager still sees far more potential in value than growth stocks, believes energy stocks are undervalued including an Australian company, and describes the need for resilience in investing.


Paul Keating's long-term plans for super and imputation

Paul Keating not only designed compulsory superannuation but in the 30 years since its introduction, he has maintained the rage. Here are highlights of three articles on SG's origins and two more recent interviews.

Fixed interest

On interest rates and credit, do you feel the need for speed?

Central bank support for credit and equity markets is reversing, which has led to wider spreads and higher rates. But what does that mean and is it time to jump at higher rates or do they have some way to go?

Investment strategies

Death notices for the 60/40 portfolio are premature

Pundits have once again declared the death of the 60% stock/40% bond portfolio amid sharp declines in both stock and bond prices. Based on history, balanced portfolios are apt to prove the naysayers wrong, again.

Exchange traded products

ETFs and the eight biggest worries in index investing

Both passive investing and ETFs have withstood criticism as their popularity has grown. They have been blamed for causing bubbles, distorting the market, and concentrating share ownership. Are any of these criticisms valid?



© 2022 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.