Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 374

Bill Ackman on how super can fix capitalism's inequities

Introduction: Bill Ackman is an American investor and Founder of Pershing Square Capital Management, a hedge fund company. He hit the headlines in March 2020 when he created "one of the best trades of all time" turning a US$27 million index and Credit Default Swap (CDS) portfolio protection play into US$2.6 billion as COVID-19 hit the markets. He explains the strong results for 2019/2020 in the following way:

"Our strong absolute and relative performance was driven by our late February and early March hedging program in the index CDS markets, the subsequent unwinding of that hedge beginning on March 12th, and the contemporaneous reinvestment of nearly all of the gains from hedging by March 18th, which allowed us to take advantage of the large decline in the share prices of our portfolio companies, and of certain new investments during that period."

Of more interest for Australian investors are his recent comments on why the stock market is rising when the economy is in trouble, and the need for the US to adopt a superannuation system similar to Australia's.

This text has been extracted from his Letter to Shareholders in the 2020 Pershing Square Holdings Ltd Financial Statement.

The current environment for listed companies

I write this letter at an extraordinary time in the history of the world. Approaching one million people have died from the effects of the virus, the global economy is suffering to a degree that was unheard of since the Great Depression, and we are faced with a greater degree of political uncertainty in the United States and globally as far back as we can remember.

The economic and health effects of the virus have and will continue to have a disproportionately negative effect on the poor and disadvantaged in the U.S. and globally. Yet, we find ourselves optimistic about the companies in our portfolio, which include quick service restaurant and coffee companies, a hotel management company/franchisor, a home improvement retailer, two residential mortgage guarantors, a scientific equipment manufacturer, and a real estate development company.

What explains this dramatic seeming disconnect?

In sum, we are entering an era in which we expect the dominant, well-capitalized, great companies that comprise our portfolio to accelerate their growth in market share and profitability over the long term as they effectively adapt to the changes wrought by the virus. While many have been puzzled by the stock market’s resurgence, in our view, it can be best explained by this phenomenon writ large. Said differently, we have a corporate inequality phenomenon in addition to an income inequality problem.

The stock market is comprised of the biggest and strongest companies, and reflects the present value of what is to come for these businesses. It is not representative of the entire economy. If there were a stock market index of private, small businesses, it would likely be down 50% or more. Small business failures will make the income inequality problem even worse.

Need to address social imbalance

If we are to avoid continued political risk and disharmony which create serious risks to the sustainability of the capitalist system, we need to find a way for those left behind to participate to a greater extent in capitalism, broadly defined. This is an important problem that must be addressed, and it is incumbent upon all of us, particularly those of us who are the greatest beneficiaries of the system, to find a potential solution.

Despite its faults, we are strongly of the view that, while far from perfect, capitalism is by far the best system for maximizing the size of the economic pie. One of the principal problems with capitalism, particularly as it has functioned over the last several decades, however, is that wage growth has not kept pace with long-term wealth creation, which has disproportionately favoured the wealthy and the upper middle class. This likely can be attributed to the higher after-tax returns generated by investment assets compared with wage growth over the same period.

Without funds to invest for retirement – particularly after the housing crash destroyed many Americans’ only other source of long-term wealth creation – one has almost no hope to build wealth for retirement, or to give the next generation a head’s start.

In sum, the American Dream has become a disappointment or worse for too many.

If capitalism continues to leave behind most Americans as the growth in wages has not come close to the more tax-efficient compound growth that has been achieved by investing in the stock market, more and more Americans will seek changes, potentially radical ones, to the current system, or seek an alternative system. Like those who rent rather than own their homes and thereby have no love lost for their landlords, Americans that have no ownership in the success of capitalism, and who are suffering economically, are more motivated to turn toward Socialism or other alternatives.

Every American child should have an investment account

One potential solution to the wealth inequality problem is to create a way for those with no investment assets to participate in the success of capitalism. We need a program that makes every American an owner of the compounding growth in value of corporate America. Compounded returns over time are indeed one of the great wonders of the world, and every day we wait to address this issue, the problem looms larger.

There are a number of potential solutions to this problem. Among them, the government could establish and fund investment accounts for every child born in America. The funds could be invested in zero-cost equity index funds, be prohibited from withdrawal until retirement, and could compound tax free for 65 years. At historical rates of equity returns of 8% per annum, a $6,750 at birth retirement account - which would cost $26 billion annually based on the average number of children born in the U.S. each year - would provide retirement assets of more than $1 million at age 65.

Praise for the Australian system

Alternatively, or hopefully in addition, corporations could be required to set aside a fixed percent of salary or wages in a tax-free investment account for all workers that would also be restricted from withdrawal until retirement, similar to the approach used by the highly successful and popular Australian superannuation system, which has created savings of scale for growing generations of its citizens. Since the superannuation system’s launch in 1991, Australia now has $2.7 trillion of superannuation assets – nearly twice the country’s GDP.

Remarkably, Australia has created the fourth largest pension system in the world, in the 53rd most populous nation.

In addition to helping all Americans build wealth for retirement, mandatory equity savings accounts for all would encourage greater financial literacy, and, as importantly, give all Americans the opportunity to participate in the success of capitalism.

We are not going to solve our country’s problems in a few short paragraphs, but we highlight the above problems as they are critically important for the country to address, and, like Covid-19, they present black-swan-type risks for investors.

These and other issues of global concern, like climate change, create substantial unresolved risks and uncertainties, and we therefore continue to remain extremely vigilant, cautious, and selective about our approach to investing your capital.

 

Bill Ackman is Chief Executive Officer of Pershing Square Capital Management, a hedge fund with assets under management of $US12 billion. This article is an extract from the 2020 Letter to Shareholders.

 

  •   9 September 2020
  • 9
  •      
  •   
9 Comments
Dr Doug Hill
September 09, 2020

A powerful argument in favour of the Australian superannuation scheme as a means of addressing inequities. A reason to pause before changing the system!

Mary
September 12, 2020

Bill W is spot on.
Nil tax on entry would encourage salary sacrifice and more investment. Estate tax not felt by contributor!!

Peter
September 09, 2020

"We need a program that makes every [American] an owner of the compounding growth in value of corporate [America]."

Well said, Bill Ackman.

Well done, Paul Keating, for taking that hugely important step towards implementing that philosophy in Australia.

Bill W
September 09, 2020

The proposal that the fund should accumulate tax free highlights a shortcoming of the Australian system whereby gains in the fund are taxed thereby reducing the amount that compounds. If the tax was deferred to the fund was activated on retirement then the fund holder would benefit from a compounding investment.

John
September 09, 2020

In the US, traditional 401(k) retirement accounts are taxed in pension phase, unlike here, but untaxed on contributions. Others (e.g. Roth IRAs) function a bit closer to our system. It's just a question of when the funds are taxed and by how much. Labor would like to move from our current TTN model to a TTT model so that super is taxed at every phase (contribution, accumulation and pension), removing the current untaxed pension phase. For high income earners (>$200k p.a.) that might mean 30% contribution tax (after Div 293), 15% earnings tax, 10% CGT and another 15%+ pension phase tax. It then makes no sense to make voluntary contributions, as wealth could be built more effectively and flexibly outside super.

Jack
September 09, 2020

Yet we spend so much effort criticising our super system and even momentum to dismantle it.

Rod
September 09, 2020

Yes we have to thank Paul Keating. Our system can be improved as Bill W said near top re tax.
Nice to hear praise for our system from a very successful American capitalist.

Gary M
September 12, 2020

Here is a benefit of super that nobody talks about. It brings people into the investing world which gradually teaches them skills in later life, as well as having money to live on.

Peter
September 12, 2020

Great extract and good follow on debate. Bill A does highlight the end in the US of the housing driven wealth factor and the need for a replacement.

Australia‘s relative stability, economic and political, has leveraged off the aspirational capitalism of home ownership and alignment with the capitalist/wealth model and dampened the hurt of boom and bust that the USA is more prone too ( and that Covid will cause here next year hopefully less so with a vaccine ).

Super is now balancing that much better. Let’s hope it provides stability if the population growth fuelled land appreciation slows. Then this mass of funds and voting power, plus the benefits of diversity, portfolio and people, will keep Australia going in the right direction.

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.