Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 163

Britain, Brexit and Australia

Countless articles have been written on Brexit, but most focus has been on the immediate panic selling after the vote. This commentary adds more context to the debate.

Britain’s long history of trading with Australia

As a British colony, Australia was heavily reliant on Britain for investment capital and export revenue. Prior to Federation in 1901, Britain bought virtually all of our exports (mainly wool and gold), making Australia one of the richest countries in the world per capita.

Britain remained our largest export partner until 1940, when it fell to second behind the United States. After the War our export mix changed dramatically, playing a vital role in the reconstruction and reemergence of Europe and Japan. By 1967, Japan’s hunger for our iron ore and coal made it our largest export partner, remaining in that position until it was superseded by China in 2010.

The chart below shows the declining role of Britain in Australia’s export revenues since the 1800s.

When Britain entered the European Community in 1973, it dismantled its preferential access system for former colonies such as Australia. By that time, however, its impact was relatively minimal given that Britain was buying less than 10% of Australian exports. This was less than the percentage of our exports going to Europe, and less than a third of what Japan was buying. Today, Britain accounts for just 1% of Australia’s export market.

Where to from here?

Britain was a late entrant into the European Community and never adopted the Euro. What was surprising about the Brexit vote, however, was the way in which voters rejected the pleas from both major parties to remain. The final result defied opinion polls taken in the days and even hours before the vote.

This surprise may explain the knee-jerk reaction of financial markets. Globally, ‘risk assets’ like shares, high-yield bonds and commodities (with the exception of gold) were gripped in a wave of panic selling. The money went into ‘safe havens’ such as cash, government bonds and gold.

Markets have since calmed, leaving investors to digest what it all means. The implications for Britain in the long term may well be benign or even positive. An exit would remove a seemingly unnecessary layer of bureaucracy that interferes with every aspect of daily life and costs tax-payers money. In addition Britons will win back some control of immigration, which was the catalyst for the sudden upsurge in dissatisfaction with Europe’s open borders policy. This renewed sense of independence and self-determination may boost spending, investment and employment.

Britain has always been a major source of investment capital for Australia and this may well increase if the Brexit proceeds. The impact of a British exit on trade should be minor in the medium to long term. As Europe accounts for half of British trade, the lower pound will help British exports. The pound fell 10% against the Euro after the vote, and is down 17% since this time last year. But it is still 5% higher than where it was three years ago, so it may need to fall considerably further to provide any real benefit for British exporters.

A more likely impact will be on British companies that operate in Europe under the EU passport system that allows firms to function across the EU without extra licensing in each country. Obtaining new licences should not be a problem for most companies but there will be inevitable disruption in the transition. Some very successful economies operate in Europe outside the EU, like Switzerland and Norway.

Fragmentation may accelerate

While Britain negotiates new treaties, short-term disruption and uncertainty will probably cause an economic slowdown and it may also slow growth rates in Europe, which has been stagnant since the GFC. The Brexit may also accelerate the end of 'Great' Britain. Scottish and Northern Ireland voters overwhelmingly voted to remain in the Union, leading to renewed calls for Scottish independence and the reunification of Ireland.

Another result of the vote is that it may accelerate fragmentation of the EU and Eurozone. It will certainly embolden anti-EU parties across the continent and there are already movements in France (Frexit) and the Netherlands (Nexit). It may also provide more impetus to internal independence movements such as Catalonia in Spain, Flanders in Belgium, Basque in France, and many others. Further political unrest could delay investment spending, leading to slower economic growth and higher unemployment.

More worrying is if the Brexit is seen as a backward step in the globalisation of trade and investment. The European experiment was undoubtedly good for the European recovery after World War 2, but since the GFC we have seen increasing signs of protectionism and currency wars between the big players – the US, China, Japan, and Europe.

 

Ashley Owen is Chief Investment Officer at independent advisory firm Stanford Brown and The Lunar Group. He is also a Director of Third Link Investment Managers, a fund that supports Australian charities.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.