Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 262

Cuffelinks Newsletter Edition 262

  •   13 July 2018
  •      
  •   

There are many theories about why most active fund managers fail to consistently outperform their benchmarks. It takes many years of study and market experience to become a portfolio manager, but good results are often elusive. One theory is that there are so many skillful managers pricing shares that the market is relatively efficient and tough to beat.

Research by Hendrik Bessembinder of Arizona State University shows active management and stock selection is really difficult. He found that most stocks listed in the US since 1926 delivered lifetime negative returns relative to one-month US Treasury bills. Only 4% of companies (represented by the blue box below), or about 1,000 out of a total data base of over 25,000, produced half the returns of the entire market.




The grey space of the outer box represents the vast majority of companies that generated no returns, with 12% delisting at an average of 2.5% of their listing price. It's more common to invest in losers than winners, especially when competing against other talented analysts.

It's even more difficult to value a loss-making startup that has a good idea gaining traction. We take a close look at Raiz Invest, the former Acorns Australia, both as a micro investing platform and a company recently listed on the ASX. What's it worth? Take a guess.

Banks compete aggressively in many products, such as housing loans, but bank retail FX rates have always been pathetic. As I write this, the wholesale AUD/USD is 0.7419 and the retail rate from a major bank is 0.71. So A$100 buys US$71 at a branch instead of US$74, a difference of over 4% and a costly start to a holiday. Matthew Hayja uncovers the choices for a better deal.

The $1.6 million pension cap opens a number of financial planning choices, and Graeme Colleyand Emma Partenza explain how to contribute for a spouse with lower balances. Julie Steedalso shows how disability insurance works, something we all hope we don't need but might.

Longevity? 120 years is just the start

Few retirees know how long their money needs to last, and the doubt causes many to live frugally. Adam Curtis examines the dilemma that sequencing and longevity risks create. 
   
In the King James Bible, 2 Kings 25:27, the King of Babylon releases the King of Judah ...

"And set his throne above the throne of the kings that were with him in Babylon;
And changed his prison garments:
And he did eat bread continually before him all the days of his life.
And his allowance was a continual allowance given him of the king, a daily rate for every day, all the days of his life."


Average life expectancy in biblical times was less than 40 years, so the cost of this promise was probably not great. But in a presentation last year, Hamish Douglass of Magellan said that medical advances would allow people to live to 500. What about 1,000 years? While scientists do not unanimously support the claims of Ori Eyal, it's thought-provoking for how long retirement may last some time in the future.

Also looking into the future, the White Paper from MFS Investment Management is 'Dawn of the Urban Epoch', with the consequences for investing in an increasingly urbanised world.

ASIC on property spruikers for SMSFs

ASIC is watching SMSF service providers closely. The regulator recently found 90% of advice given to SMSFs was non-compliant and 30% risked disadvantaging the client. There was also a focus on 'one-stop shops' for the purchase of geared property through SMSFs, with groups of agents, lenders, brokers, developers and financial advisers all working together, even when a property was not suitable. So we reprise my article published in 2013 where I attended one of these spruiking seminars, when I was shocked by what happened. It's taken five years to 'crack down'.

A reminder that some new super regulations came in last week, including topping up unused $25,000 concessional limits over the following five years for super balances less than $500,000, and the new downsizing rules for people over 65 to make a non-concessional contribution.

Mark your diaries for 6 August 2018. The Financial Services Royal Commission has asked 30 superannuation funds to make a director available to give evidence. More sweaty palms.

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

Edition 262 | 13 Jul 2018 | Editorial | Newsletter

 

  •   13 July 2018
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.