Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 280

Cuffelinks Newsletter Edition 280

  •   16 November 2018
  •      
  •   

Something for everyone this week, so please forward to anyone who might benefit from a free subscription. If this newsletter has been forwarded to you, please click here to register and receive a range of free ebooks on investing.

SMSF global asset exposure

There is a marketing ploy used by a few global equity managers which always makes me question the quality of their research. I saw it again last week. A high profile manager presenting to over a hundred retail investors quoted the ATO data on SMSF investments in global equities as 1.3%. Even the ATO says it's incorrect. The presentation material said, "Concentration risk is possibly the biggest risk in a typical SMSF portfolio." Their chart is reproduced below.

The chart on the right hand side is more accurate. Hasan Tevfik of MST Marquee is a long-time SMSF watcher, and his estimate gives an allocation to global equities of about 12%. In addition, the Productivity Commission reports a global bond allocation by SMSFs of about 3%, and there would be more in asset classes such as infrastructure. The 'global assets' number is more likely about 15% and nowhere near 1.3%.

 


The fund manager should do better. Not only does it question the quality of the research, it shows a lack of understanding of their client base and perhaps dubious transparency.

Labor welcome to submit an article

No other topic has generated as many comments in Cuffelinks as the Labor proposal on franking credits. Clearly, due to our type of audience, most comments are critical, but many support Labor. After we posted the request from Tim Wilson MP last week, a reader wrote: "The Wilson-led enquiry is no doubt a smoke screen for a forthcoming Liberal 'pensioner scare campaign'." 

We will publish a Labor response if they write it for us, and an invitation has been extended. Both sides of politics are guilty of misrepresenting the retrospective nature of policy changes. We argued Scott Morrison did this with the superannuation changes when he was Treasurer, despite his assurance:

"That is why I fear that the approach of taxing in that retirement phase penalises Australians who have put money into superannuation under the current rules – under the deal that they thought was there. It may not be technical retrospectivity but it certainly feels that way. It is effective retrospectivity, the tax technicians and superannuation tax technicians may say differently."

But Labor is equally guilty claiming policy changes have no retrospective element, such as:

"While making change to the tax system to improve fairness is a policy objective of Labor, it must be done without negative retrospective impacts on existing investments. This same approach was taken by Labor (in) the announcement policy to curb generous and excessive tax concessions for high income superannuation accounts."

Let's call it one-all for political-speak on financial policy changes.

At the risk of presenting one side of the argument again, Jon Kalkman argues Labor's proposal has the greatest impact on low income earners due to the 30% company tax rate. Peter Burgessbacks up his view in an attached paper.  

More on investing and strategy ...

Sam Wylie delves into the three big fees you should check in your investment portfolio, and Noel Whittaker shows in certain circumstances, the $1.6 million cap no longer needs monitoring.

Rachel Lane challenges the other Royal Commission, the one on aged care, to remove the complexities and anomalies, while Recep Peker reports new research on how investors are suddenly pessimistic on share market returns. Prescient given recent falls?

In a reply to my 4Ps of roboadvice article last week, Harry Chemay has provided a comprehensive response.

The new CEO of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), David Locke, writes exclusively for Cuffelinks on how it will operate


This week's White Paper from BetaShares is their latest update on the ETF market. Showing more institutions are using the market, ETFs had their highest turnover for a month at $3.9 billion.

For the first time, the Financial Services Royal Commission comes to Sydney next week. The best free show in town starring the bank CEOs starts at 10am Monday at 97-99 Goulburn Street. 

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

For a PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles, click here.

 

  •   16 November 2018
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

The investment that sidesteps the new tax traps

Tax rules have changed, but many investors are still using yesterday’s strategies. Insurance bonds may offer advantages for those seeking greater control, tax efficiency and certainty about their wealth.

Testamentary trusts have secured the CGT exemption

Treasury’s latest CGT reform draft delivers a win for testamentary trusts and deceased estates, exempting estate-derived gains from the 30% floor. However, questions on death and divorce rollovers remain unresolved.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Latest Updates

Planning

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Investment strategies

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Economy

Population growth masks Australia’s productivity problem

For years, investors have benefited from a seemingly reliable growth story. But recent national accounts raise uncomfortable questions about what has really been driving Australia’s economy and whether that can continue unchecked.

Investment strategies

Why tomorrow’s winners may not be today’s index leaders

The stocks that built retirement balances over the past decade now dominate many portfolios. The new challenge is whether these companies can continue meeting the increasingly high expectations embedded in today's share prices.

Investing

What earnings surprises reveal about future returns

Sometimes the most important information in an earnings result isn't the number itself. It's the possibility that the market's assumptions have been fundamentally wrong and future earnings may look very different.

SMSF strategies

Individual SMSF Trusteeship directly liable for ATO fines

A rarely discussed detail buried in SMSF structures could dramatically change who wears the cost when something goes wrong. With penalties rising, a decision many dismissed as administrative may deserve a second look.

Investment strategies

The currency bet you didn’t know you made

Buying global shares means making two bets: on the companies and on the Australian dollar. Most investors consciously choose only the first. Last financial year, the second bet cost 8.5% in returns for many investors.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.