Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 280

Cuffelinks Newsletter Edition 280

  •   16 November 2018
  •      
  •   

Something for everyone this week, so please forward to anyone who might benefit from a free subscription. If this newsletter has been forwarded to you, please click here to register and receive a range of free ebooks on investing.

SMSF global asset exposure

There is a marketing ploy used by a few global equity managers which always makes me question the quality of their research. I saw it again last week. A high profile manager presenting to over a hundred retail investors quoted the ATO data on SMSF investments in global equities as 1.3%. Even the ATO says it's incorrect. The presentation material said, "Concentration risk is possibly the biggest risk in a typical SMSF portfolio." Their chart is reproduced below.

The chart on the right hand side is more accurate. Hasan Tevfik of MST Marquee is a long-time SMSF watcher, and his estimate gives an allocation to global equities of about 12%. In addition, the Productivity Commission reports a global bond allocation by SMSFs of about 3%, and there would be more in asset classes such as infrastructure. The 'global assets' number is more likely about 15% and nowhere near 1.3%.

 


The fund manager should do better. Not only does it question the quality of the research, it shows a lack of understanding of their client base and perhaps dubious transparency.

Labor welcome to submit an article

No other topic has generated as many comments in Cuffelinks as the Labor proposal on franking credits. Clearly, due to our type of audience, most comments are critical, but many support Labor. After we posted the request from Tim Wilson MP last week, a reader wrote: "The Wilson-led enquiry is no doubt a smoke screen for a forthcoming Liberal 'pensioner scare campaign'." 

We will publish a Labor response if they write it for us, and an invitation has been extended. Both sides of politics are guilty of misrepresenting the retrospective nature of policy changes. We argued Scott Morrison did this with the superannuation changes when he was Treasurer, despite his assurance:

"That is why I fear that the approach of taxing in that retirement phase penalises Australians who have put money into superannuation under the current rules – under the deal that they thought was there. It may not be technical retrospectivity but it certainly feels that way. It is effective retrospectivity, the tax technicians and superannuation tax technicians may say differently."

But Labor is equally guilty claiming policy changes have no retrospective element, such as:

"While making change to the tax system to improve fairness is a policy objective of Labor, it must be done without negative retrospective impacts on existing investments. This same approach was taken by Labor (in) the announcement policy to curb generous and excessive tax concessions for high income superannuation accounts."

Let's call it one-all for political-speak on financial policy changes.

At the risk of presenting one side of the argument again, Jon Kalkman argues Labor's proposal has the greatest impact on low income earners due to the 30% company tax rate. Peter Burgessbacks up his view in an attached paper.  

More on investing and strategy ...

Sam Wylie delves into the three big fees you should check in your investment portfolio, and Noel Whittaker shows in certain circumstances, the $1.6 million cap no longer needs monitoring.

Rachel Lane challenges the other Royal Commission, the one on aged care, to remove the complexities and anomalies, while Recep Peker reports new research on how investors are suddenly pessimistic on share market returns. Prescient given recent falls?

In a reply to my 4Ps of roboadvice article last week, Harry Chemay has provided a comprehensive response.

The new CEO of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), David Locke, writes exclusively for Cuffelinks on how it will operate. 


This week's White Paper from BetaShares is their latest update on the ETF market. Showing more institutions are using the market, ETFs had their highest turnover for a month at $3.9 billion.

For the first time, the Financial Services Royal Commission comes to Sydney next week. The best free show in town starring the bank CEOs starts at 10am Monday at 97-99 Goulburn Street. 

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

For a PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles, click here.

 

  •   16 November 2018
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

The retirement scorecard: how many of these questions can you answer?

From the maths of retirement, estimating spending and picking the right asset allocation to survive a poor decade, here are the questions every retiree – current or future – should be able to answer for themselves.

Testamentary trusts: Treasury has picked the wrong reading

A decades-old estate planning tool has survived one tax crackdown only to be caught by another. The surprise isn't who the reform is targeting, but who could end up paying the price for drafting choices made years ago.

How the typical Australian Family could save $844,350 in taxes

The value of a testamentary trust is not determined by wealth alone. Depending on circumstances, it can reduce the tax burden on inherited income, create efficiencies and help build intergenerational wealth.

The housing slide could become a crash

House prices are sliding across Australia, yet the most dangerous ingredient for a housing crash is still missing. If job losses surge amid growing economic risks, today's correction could become a historic property downturn.

Will investors be better or worse off under new housing tax changes?

Housing tax reforms have sparked warnings of market turmoil and promises of greater fairness. But after modelling nearly two decades of property data, the results suggest winners and losers may not be who many investors expect.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Division 296: the initial moves to make before the windows close

What if the best superannuation strategy isn't about earning more, but acting before your options disappear? Several overlooked planning windows are narrowing, with consequences that can last for decades.

Planning

Avoid unnecessary CGT with this estate planning clause

A simple estate plan can create a ticking time bomb. One overlooked clause can pit spouses against children, delay inheritances, and potentially leave a family facing an unexpected tax bill worth hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Exchange traded products

The hidden trade-off in fixed income ETFs

Some investment trade-offs are immediately visible. Others are embedded in the way a portfolio is constructed. Understanding the difference may explain why similar-looking investments can produce surprisingly different results.

Retirement

The mortgage free retirement is fading

What happens when a generation reaches retirement carrying obligations previous generations largely avoided? New research suggests we may need to rethink both how much we need in retirement and what life could look like.

Retirement

The key question to inspire a confident and purposeful retirement

Most people spend decades planning for retirement. Far fewer plan for what happens when they get there. The difference may explain why so many find the transition harder and less fulfilling than expected, despite careful preparation.

Latest from Morningstar

Making the case for a 'good enough' portfolio

Some investors spend years chasing the perfect strategy. Others choose a path that’s simply good enough and move on. Which approach is more likely to deliver both better outcomes and a happier financial life over the long run?

Investment strategies

Is the US market as expensive as CAPE says?

Many investing ideas survive for decades. But that does not make them right. A famous valuation measure implies that US shares are dangerously expensive, but the evidence may point to a very different conclusion.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.