Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Register

9 October 2026

Home / 308

Cuffelinks Firstlinks Edition 308

Welcome to Firstlinks Newsletter Edition 308
Graham Hand

Graham Hand


In an edition chock-full of investment ideas, we start with a caution to the people calling for Labor's franking credits policy to be modified with either a grandfathering or a cap on the amount. For SMSFs, neither will work.

For example, two days after the election, on 20 May, the AFR wrote:

"Surely some sort of compromise position – a cap of say $15,000 on franking credit refunds – would have defused the issue in such a way that showed Labor wasn’t being harsh or unfair, but also allowed it to keep some of the budget savings."

They are overlooking that the SMSF, not the member, is the taxpayer. The cap would need to be on the SMSF, and anyone could manage the cap by opening multiple SMSFs. Grandfathering the impact is also flawed because a fund can change members. Trustees can enter (or leave) a fund when they wish, allowing new members to benefit from the grandfathering. Any revised proposal must address the inequity between SMSFs and APRA funds of the previous policy.

Which brings us to Treasurer Josh Frydenberg's support for the Productivity Commission's proposal to review the retirement incomes system. This is a big deal. The Commission made 31 recommendations, including the 'Best in Show' super fund shortlist. Although during the election campaign, Scott Morrison ruled out changing taxes on superannuation, the opening of a formal review puts everything back on the table - pension rules, the role of the family home in the assets test, taper rates, industry fund governance, fees. Forget keeping superannuation policy out of the headlines.

What super rules do you think are vulnerable in this review? Respond using Have Your Say.

Dozens of investing insights ...  

We continue our Interview Series with the CEO of Charter Hall, David Harrison. He identifies the major trends in property investing across retail, industrial and office, and while he likes diversity, he describes the sector he prefers and the one to watch carefully.

Two other investment products that should benefit from the clarification about franking credits are hybrids and Listed Investment Companies (LICs). On hybrids, Christopher Joye says the widening of spreads at a time when banks have improved their tier 1 capital strength is an opportunity. Then Norman Derham and Campbell Dawson describe the risk-adjusted returns of hybrids over equities, and their place in a diversified portfolio.

It's worth mentioning that both these papers are written by specialists who manage hybrid funds, and understand the complexities of these instruments. Hybrids may not suit the more conservative investor as they sit in a junior position in the capital structure, as shown below.



Many LICs saw their share prices fall by up to 10% since the start of the year amid the uncertainty created by franking, and some companies were considering converting to trusts. Dugald Higginsexplains which types of LICs are best suited to this structure.

Remember that we have extensive pricing and reports on hybrids, LICs and ETFs in our Education Centre, the place to go when you're researching for listed investments.

Investors came out of the election result with new-found optimism, especially for banks, but Jonathan Rochford sees warning signs for some tech shares and debt markets. Massive pools of liquidity have pushed up valuations in many asset types worldwide. It brings to mind advice Warren Buffett gave in 2006, just before the GFC hit all markets:

"Any asset class that has a big move, that’s based initially on fundamentals, is going to attract speculative participation at some point, and that speculative participation can become dominant as time goes by ... How far it goes, you never know. Some things go on to just unbelievable heights."

One way to invest is to watch major global trends and find companies that benefit from societal changes. David Sheasby and Will Baylis identify four food trends to whet your appetite.

Finally, two provocative articles take a critical look at 'value' investing. Jason Orthman and Mark Arnold debunk its reliance on share prices reverting to some normal or mean measure, while Graeme Shaw and Rob Perrone say the way value indexes are constructed is flawed. Both articles are bound to have opposing views, but that's what makes a market.

This week's White Paper from Fidelity International is an excellent one-pager on the different features of Active ETFs, passive ETFs, managed funds, LICs and LITs. They all perform a similar role but have unique characteristics which may suit certain investors.

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

 

For a PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles, click here.


 

  •   31 May 2019
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:
Firstlinks is sponsored by:
banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

It’s time for LICs to die

A high-profile dividend cut and a prominent fund manager’s apology have reignited a long-running debate. If investors can access similar exposures more cheaply and efficiently elsewhere, what exactly is keeping LICs alive?

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Is it time to bail on Australian stocks?

For generations, Australian investors have backed banks, miners and dividends. But has that loyalty come at a cost? A look at the numbers raises an uncomfortable question about where future returns will come from.

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

The investing rule that explains the next market crash

What if investment success depends less on picking the right assets and more on understanding the decisions of other investors? A principle borrowed from game theory offers a different perspective on markets.

Latest Updates

Fixed interest

Higher yields are creating opportunities in global bonds

Bond markets are adjusting to a new reality, but not in the ways investors expect. With markets repricing and capital competing for attention, investors may need to rethink where resilience and opportunity lie. 

Economy

Are we in a recession?

What if the warning signs are already everywhere? From supermarket aisles to company failures, investors are being bombarded with recession signals. But most face a different risk that can be just as dangerous for portfolios. 

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs - Division 296 actuarial certificates

The tax bill might be yours, but the event that caused it may not be. A key Division 296 calculation can sometimes attribute earnings in ways that many SMSF trustees won't instinctively expect or fully appreciate.

Property

The first impact of negative gearing reform is not the tax bill

Negative gearing changes formally begin in 2027, but the first consequences may already be here. A subtle shift is quietly influencing who can borrow, how much they can access and which property strategies still stack up.

Economy

The oil market is running out of easy answers

The biggest threat to markets may not be what investors are watching. The numbers have stopped adding up and supply is harder to measure, with forecasts becoming simple guesses. A more fragile reality is being masked.

Investment strategies

The state of investor knowledge in Australia

Australians are investing more than ever, yet a surprising divide is emerging between those building wealth effectively and those making costly mistakes. Surprisingly, the gap has little to do with income, age or starting capital.

Taxation

Complexity and capital gains

A case study shows that the ‘30% minimum CGT’ is a poorly conceived tax that adds significant complexity to an already over-complex system. A less complicated model would create a much fairer progressive tax scale.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

Site Map

About Firstlinks

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.