Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 308

Cuffelinks Firstlinks Edition 308

Welcome to Firstlinks Newsletter Edition 308
Graham Hand

Graham Hand


In an edition chock-full of investment ideas, we start with a caution to the people calling for Labor's franking credits policy to be modified with either a grandfathering or a cap on the amount. For SMSFs, neither will work.

For example, two days after the election, on 20 May, the AFR wrote:

"Surely some sort of compromise position – a cap of say $15,000 on franking credit refunds – would have defused the issue in such a way that showed Labor wasn’t being harsh or unfair, but also allowed it to keep some of the budget savings."

They are overlooking that the SMSF, not the member, is the taxpayer. The cap would need to be on the SMSF, and anyone could manage the cap by opening multiple SMSFs. Grandfathering the impact is also flawed because a fund can change members. Trustees can enter (or leave) a fund when they wish, allowing new members to benefit from the grandfathering. Any revised proposal must address the inequity between SMSFs and APRA funds of the previous policy.

Which brings us to Treasurer Josh Frydenberg's support for the Productivity Commission's proposal to review the retirement incomes system. This is a big deal. The Commission made 31 recommendations, including the 'Best in Show' super fund shortlist. Although during the election campaign, Scott Morrison ruled out changing taxes on superannuation, the opening of a formal review puts everything back on the table - pension rules, the role of the family home in the assets test, taper rates, industry fund governance, fees. Forget keeping superannuation policy out of the headlines.

What super rules do you think are vulnerable in this review? Respond using Have Your Say.

Dozens of investing insights ...  

We continue our Interview Series with the CEO of Charter HallDavid Harrison. He identifies the major trends in property investing across retail, industrial and office, and while he likes diversity, he describes the sector he prefers and the one to watch carefully.

Two other investment products that should benefit from the clarification about franking credits are hybrids and Listed Investment Companies (LICs). On hybrids, Christopher Joye says the widening of spreads at a time when banks have improved their tier 1 capital strength is an opportunity. Then Norman Derham and Campbell Dawson describe the risk-adjusted returns of hybrids over equities, and their place in a diversified portfolio.

It's worth mentioning that both these papers are written by specialists who manage hybrid funds, and understand the complexities of these instruments. Hybrids may not suit the more conservative investor as they sit in a junior position in the capital structure, as shown below.



Many LICs saw their share prices fall by up to 10% since the start of the year amid the uncertainty created by franking, and some companies were considering converting to trusts. Dugald Higginsexplains which types of LICs are best suited to this structure.

Remember that we have extensive pricing and reports on hybrids, LICs and ETFs in our Education Centre, the place to go when you're researching for listed investments.

Investors came out of the election result with new-found optimism, especially for banks, but Jonathan Rochford sees warning signs for some tech shares and debt markets. Massive pools of liquidity have pushed up valuations in many asset types worldwide. It brings to mind advice Warren Buffett gave in 2006, just before the GFC hit all markets:

"Any asset class that has a big move, that’s based initially on fundamentals, is going to attract speculative participation at some point, and that speculative participation can become dominant as time goes by ... How far it goes, you never know. Some things go on to just unbelievable heights."

One way to invest is to watch major global trends and find companies that benefit from societal changes. David Sheasby and Will Baylis identify four food trends to whet your appetite.

Finally, two provocative articles take a critical look at 'value' investing. Jason Orthman and Mark Arnold debunk its reliance on share prices reverting to some normal or mean measure, while Graeme Shaw and Rob Perrone say the way value indexes are constructed is flawed. Both articles are bound to have opposing views, but that's what makes a market.

This week's White Paper from Fidelity International is an excellent one-pager on the different features of Active ETFs, passive ETFs, managed funds, LICs and LITs. They all perform a similar role but have unique characteristics which may suit certain investors.

Graham Hand, Managing Editor

 

For a PDF version of this week’s newsletter articles, click here.


 

  •   31 May 2019
  •      
  •   

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.