Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 209

Housing affordability for millennials and baby boomers

When talking with our clients, it is clear that housing and property ownership is a major concern. The implications for their financial plans are significant, whether they are worried about:

  • how their children will be able to afford their own home
  • where they will live in retirement
  • what to do with the family home once their children move out.

It is hardly surprising, therefore, that two of the most talked-about measures in the May 2017 Federal Budget were to do with housing and affordability – the super tax break to encourage downsizing, and the First Home Super Saving Scheme.

While the measures deal with opposite ends of the property owner spectrum, first home buyers and downsizers, they both respond to the same issue of the lack of housing supply in key markets.

The key question is: will the new policies achieve what they are intended to achieve, or are they simply policies in response to populism?

First Home Super Saving Scheme

There have been previous government measures to attempt to help young people get their foot on the property ladder, but their success has been debateable. Some schemes, such as the First Home Buyer Grant, were criticised for doing more to push up house prices than help buyers.

The First Home Super Saving Scheme (FHSSS) attempts to avoid such issues by instead offering a tax-advantaged way to save for a first home, but there are a number of questions unanswered.

The idea is to allow first home buyers to take advantage of the lower taxed superannuation regime to save for a deposit, as well as allowing them to benefit from the deemed earnings generated by the super fund. If the proposal is passed, people will be able make voluntary contributions of up to $15,000 per year to their super fund which they can then withdraw to help buy a first home.

One key question is how super funds will honour the deemed earnings (calculated at the bank bill rate plus 3%). Investment earnings can’t be guaranteed so how will the deemed earnings be funded in years when the fund doesn’t generate returns above the rate used?

Another question is how quickly super funds will be able to release the money for practical purposes. With a house auction, funds for the deposit are required on the same day as the offer while for a sales process, the exchange cannot occur until the deposit is received.

Another concern is how this scheme will operate for couples where one partner is a first home buyer and the other is not.

The reality is that the amount that can be saved through the scheme alone won’t accumulate enough for most home deposits in major cities. Most people will need a multi-strategy approach in conjunction with the FHSSS to accumulate a meaningful deposit.

Nonetheless, the discipline of sacrificing regular amounts to superannuation could be a way for younger people to engage with their superannuation.

Downsizing incentives

The Budget also included changes designed to encourage retirees to tax-effectively downsize from their family home, but they may leave some retirees worse off financially, particularly with the potential impact on the age pension.

The government has proposed that retirees will be able to put an extra $300,000 each (or $600,000 per couple) into super from the proceeds of selling their family home after they turn 65. Overall, it is a positive move for many people who are over 65 and no longer able to contribute any more into super.

This could include those who do not pass the work test (this would be the majority) or who have total super balance above $1.6 million (this would be the minority). A couple with accumulated assets outside of their home of greater than $821,000, or a single person with more than $546,000, may benefit from these changes.

However, selling down the home and placing the proceeds into super may not be the best strategy for everyone. The family home is exempt from the assets test for the age pension, but super is included. With the new assets test taper rate of $3.00 a fortnight for every $1,000 of assets, this works out as a reduction in pension payments of $78 in pension payments for every $1,000 now included in the assets test.

It is unlikely that these changes will be the driving factor into downsizing. Lifestyle factors nearly always head the list, such as being closer to family or the home just being too big to look after.

Future success

Perhaps the best measure of success for these proposals will be whether they encourage people – both young and old – to engage more with their superannuation and consider strategies to put more money in while they can. On their own, the proposals are unlikely to have a significant impact on housing affordability, but they may, in small, incremental steps, make it easier for older people to move out of big homes that they struggle to maintain, and for young people to take their first foray into property ownership.


Jonathan Philpot is Wealth Management Partner with accountants and business and financial advisers HLB Mann Judd Sydney.



Leave a Comment:



The sorry saga of housing affordability and ownership

Generational wealth transfers will affect all investors

Four ways to reduce the generation blame game


Most viewed in recent weeks

10 reasons wealthy homeowners shouldn't receive welfare

The RBA Governor says rising house prices are due to "the design of our taxation and social security systems". The OECD says "the prolonged boom in house prices has inflated the wealth of many pensioners without impacting their pension eligibility." What's your view?

House prices surge but falls are common and coming

We tend to forget that house prices often fall. Direct lending controls are more effective than rate rises because macroprudential limits affect the volume of money for housing leaving business rates untouched.

Survey responses on pension eligibility for wealthy homeowners

The survey drew a fantastic 2,000 responses with over 1,000 comments and polar opposite views on what is good policy. Do most people believe the home should be in the age pension asset test, and what do they say?

100 Aussies: five charts on who earns, pays and owns

Any policy decision needs to recognise who is affected by a change. It pays to check the data on who pays taxes, who owns assets and who earns the income to ensure an equitable and efficient outcome.

Three good comments from the pension asset test article

With articles on the pensions assets test read about 40,000 times, 3,500 survey responses and thousands of comments, there was a lot of great reader participation. A few comments added extra insights.

Coles no longer happy with the status quo

It used to be Down, Down for prices but the new status quo is Down Down for emissions. Until now, the realm of ESG has been mainly fund managers as 'responsible investors', but companies are now pushing credentials.

Latest Updates


The 'Contrast Principle' used by super fund test failures

Rather than compare results against APRA's benchmark, large super funds which failed the YFYS performance test are using another measure such as a CPI+ target, with more favourable results to show their members.


RBA switched rate priority on house prices versus jobs

RBA Governor, Philip Lowe, says that surging house prices are not as important as full employment, but a previous Governor, Glenn Stevens, had other priorities, putting the "elevated level of house prices" first.

Investment strategies

Disruptive innovation and the Tesla valuation debate

Two prominent fund managers with strongly opposing views and techniques. Cathie Wood thinks Tesla is going to US$3,000, Rob Arnott says it's already a bubble at US$750. They debate valuing growth and disruption.


4 key materials for batteries and 9 companies that will benefit

Four key materials are required for battery production as we head towards 30X the number of electric cars. It opens exciting opportunities for Australian companies as the country aims to become a regional hub.


Why valuation multiples fail in an exponential world

Estimating the value of a company based on a multiple of earnings is a common investment analysis technique, but it is often useless. Multiples do a poor job of valuing the best growth businesses, like Microsoft.


Five value chains driving the ‘transition winners’

The ability to adapt to change makes a company more likely to sustain today’s profitability. There are five value chains plus a focus on cashflow and asset growth that the 'transition winners' are adopting.


Halving super drawdowns helps wealthy retirees most

At the start of COVID, the Government allowed early access to super, but in a strange twist, others were permitted to leave money in tax-advantaged super for another year. It helped the wealthy and should not be repeated.



© 2021 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. Any general advice or ‘regulated financial advice’ under New Zealand law has been prepared by Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892) and/or Morningstar Research Ltd, subsidiaries of Morningstar, Inc, without reference to your objectives, financial situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide (AU) and Financial Advice Provider Disclosure Statement (NZ). You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.

Website Development by Master Publisher.