Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 438

Fixed income flows are strong, but who's winning and why?

Fixed income is typically the quiet achiever in the Australian retail asset management industry. Recently, it has benefited from strong net flows with the mass exits from term deposits due to ultra-low rates and a steadily declining risk profile across the retail asset management industry as the market continues to mature and shift towards a retirement focus.

The role of fixed income in Australian retail asset management

Source: NMG Managed Funds Review (June 2021)
1 Multi-sector FUM and net flows excludes that attributed to MySuper

However, that tailwind is not treating all fixed income funds equally, and there is only a handful of winners.

Concentration of fixed income funds

As part of our engagements on building portfolios, advisers and their clients state they have different primary core objectives in their fixed income allocations: 

  1. Yield: nil (or very limited) potential for capital loss while seeking to generate a consistent yield 
  2. Defensive: reduce the volatility versus the growth asset allocations
  3. Diversifier: lower risk than growth assets but still generate some returns.

While these objectives are not mutually exclusive (in fact, most advisers have a primary and secondary objective), the primary objective has a significant impact on the types of products used and the resulting allocations.

Which fund managers are the winners?

Those eight products grouped in the exhibit above currently receiving half of fixed income net flow are particularly relevant to one of the objectives, and are therefore heavily supported by investors who use that as their primary approach to allocating to fixed income.

The leading funds are:

  • Ardea Real Outcome Fund
  • La Trobe Australian Credit Fund
  • Janus Henderson Tactical Income Trust
  • Vanguard Global Aggregate Bond Index Fund
  • iShares Australian Bond Index Fund
  • Vanguard Australian Fixed Interest Fund
  • Franklin Absolute Return Fund
  • PIMCO Diversified Fixed Income Fund

Instead of trying to appeal to all investors, these funds recognise they may be too hot or too cold for some objectives. Instead, they understand where they are ‘just right’ for a particular objective that advisers want from their fixed income allocations, and then target their product, sales and marketing activity accordingly.

Just as we have seen with equity fund allocations moving away from benchmark-relative products towards a barbell approach with a blend of passive and high conviction product, we are seeing fixed income allocations shift away from traditional products towards those targeted to one of these core objectives.

For fixed income managers, this means finding a 'Goldilocks' position, and making sure products are ‘just right’ and designed to meet one of these primary fixed income objectives.

 

David Hutchison and Andrew Cummins are Partners at NMG Consulting, part of the NMG Group. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 


 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.