Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 511

Key trends in global dividend income

After two solid years of post pandemic dividend growth, it is pleasing to see the trend in Q1 2023, providing great news for retirees.

In AUD terms income growth was very strong (+10.1% v Q1 2022). Approximately half of this was due to currency moves, with payouts still growing a solid +5.8% in local currency terms.

Global developed market companies had a strong quarter, paying out $A571 billion of dividends in Q1. Strong payouts continue to mask significant differences across countries and sectors.

Importantly, the number of companies cutting to zero remained low in Q1 (5.1%). This supports our house view of future dividend strength.

The Plato Global Equity fund continues to distribute just under 6% p.a. yield since inception, despite lower index yields in recent years. This highlights the continued importance of both income generation via active management and avoiding dividend traps.


Source: Factset

54% of dividend paying companies increased or initiated dividends compared to the same quarter last year. The number of companies decreasing payouts, has ticked up significantly due to the challenging macro environment, but remains moderate at 12%.

We continue to see some large companies, such as Visa Inc, Costco Wholesale, and Shell Plc, increase their dollar payouts. In addition businesses, like shipping company AP Moller - Maersk, have paid out significant special dividends, a continuing post pandemic feature.

North America and Europe increased quarterly income, in contrast to weakening payouts in Asia, when compared to the previous corresponding period in 2022. (North America +13.1%, Europe +16%, Asia -1.4%)

Which countries are leading the charge?

When comparing Q1 2023 with Q1 2022 the story varied significantly within countries. Asian countries ranged from Hong Kong (-23% ) to Singapore (+27%), whilst European countries spanned Finland (-24%) to the Netherlands (+175%).

The US posted strong (+12.5%) dividend growth when based in Aussie dollars. Although not yet a substantial driver, it’s worth noting the US buyback tax did come into effect at the start of Q1.

Despite falling in Q1 (-5.2% v Q1 2022), Australian dividends posted $A32 billion, the fourth highest from a developed country. Despite strong increases from CBA and Woodside, the drop in payout was driven by miners including RIO, BHP, and Fortescue.


Source: Factset

What happened in global sectors through Q4?

Mirroring the trend in countries, sectors were also mixed versus Q1 2022. The stand out increase was once again energy companies (+44%), followed by consumer discretionary (+19.4%). At the other end of the spectrum, materials (-19.9%) payouts fell the most, with telco’s (-6.5%) also cutting significantly.

The drivers of yield, energy and consumer discretionary, continue to be consistent from 2022.

This is similar to the domestic landscape, where big miners are cutting in contrast to energy companies who are lifting dividends to reflect surging gas prices. After a stellar 2022 energy stock prices underperformed in Q1, but strong dividends reflect the balance sheets from the earlier commodity rally. Increased payouts were seen from businesses in the sector, including Equinor and Japan Petroleum Exploration. Co. In contrast materials businesses, for example Rio Tinto and BHP, cut.

Consumer discretionary yield strengthened further, driven by surprisingly strong household balance sheets. In 2023 the sector has overcome cost of living pressures, posting strong stock price return. Many Japanese companies in the sector, like Fast Retailing Co and Suzuki Motor Corp, grew their distributions in the most recent quarter.

Interesting facts in global income

When incorporating dividend cuts and initiations, 3.4 companies increased or initiated dividends for every one company that reduced or completely cut dividends versus the previous corresponding period. This is further proof of dividends continuing to strengthen.

46% of US companies paid a dividend in Q1. Strong ratios were also evident in Japan (72%), Canada (65%) and Australia (52%).

What’s the outlook for global income?

Plato’s proprietary dividend cut model provides insights into future dividends. It represents Plato’s macro view regarding the likelihood that global developed markets will cut their income.

Our model predicts a low probability of global developed market dividends being cut (12%). Q1 is slightly higher than a year ago, which reflects the increasing concern around inflation and global growth. The risk to income remains around the long-term average and continues to indicate a positive outlook for retiree income.

Real Estate and telcos are the highest risk industry groups, the former continuing to reflect the cost of living crisis.

In conclusion

After 2020 pandemic driven cuts to global market income it is important to see two years of strong growth, albeit from a low base. Global equity markets have continued this trend in Q1 2023, reflected in strong headline numbers. But, this masks divergence within sectors, highlighting the importance of vigilance and active management in income generation.

As we look forwards, the low probability of dividend cuts paints a strong dividend picture for yield investors. 

Methodology

  1. The methodology uses dividends paid, in AUD, however the ex dividend date is used to allocate the dividends in the relevant time period e.g. Q3 2020.
  2. Dividend paid ($) for each stock in each calendar quarter is calculated as the shares outstanding as of quarter end multiplied by the total gross dividend per share (DPS) paid out in the calendar quarter. The DPS paid excludes spin offs but includes capital returns and special dividends. Conversion to AUD is done using the prevailing WM/Reuters London exchange rates at the time of dividend payment.
  3. Full year dividend paid ($) is the summation of dividend paid ($) from Q1 to Q4 using the methodology (1).
  4. DPS movement is based on total DPS paid out (in local currencies) over each calendar quarter. DPS movement from quarter to quarter is then categorised as initiating, increasing, unchanged, decreasing or cut to zero.
  5. Secondary issues are removed from the calculations to prevent double counting of income.

 

Daniel Pennell is a Senior Portfolio Manager with Plato Investment Management. Plato is affiliated with Pinnacle Investment Management, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is for general information only and does not consider the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any investor.

For more articles and papers from Pinnacle and its affiliates, click here.

 

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

7 examples of how the new super tax will be calculated

You've no doubt heard about Division 296. These case studies show what people at various levels above the $3 million threshold might need to pay the ATO, with examples ranging from under $500 to more than $35,000.

The revolt against Baby Boomer wealth

The $3m super tax could be put down to the Government needing money and the wealthy being easy targets. It’s deeper than that though and this looks at the factors behind the policy and why more taxes on the wealthy are coming.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Are franking credits hurting Australia’s economy?

Business investment and per capita GDP have languished over the past decade and the Labor Government is conducting inquiries to find out why. Franking credits should be part of the debate about our stalling economy.

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Latest Updates

Superannuation

Here's what should replace the $3 million super tax

With Div. 296 looming, is there a smarter way to tax superannuation? This proposes a fairer, income-linked alternative that respects compounding, ensures predictability, and avoids taxing unrealised capital gains. 

Superannuation

Less than 1% of wealthy families will struggle to pay super tax: study

An ANU study has found that families with at least one super balance over $3 million have average wealth exceeding $19 million - suggesting most are well placed to absorb taxes on unrealised capital gains.   

Superannuation

Are SMSFs getting too much of a free ride?

SMSFs have managed to match, or even outperform, larger super funds despite adopting more conservative investment strategies. This looks at how they've done it - and the potential policy implications.  

Property

A developer's take on Australia's housing issues

Stockland’s development chief discusses supply constraints, government initiatives and the impact of Japanese-owned homebuilders on the industry. He also talks of green shoots in a troubled property market.

Economy

Lessons from 100 years of growing US debt

As the US debt ceiling looms, the usual warnings about a potential crash in bond and equity markets have started to appear. Investors can take confidence from history but should keep an eye on two main indicators.

Investment strategies

Investors might be paying too much for familiarity

US mega-cap tech stocks have dominated recent returns - but is familiarity distorting judgement? Like the Monty Hall problem, investing success often comes from switching when it feels hardest to do so.

Latest from Morningstar

A winning investment strategy sitting right under your nose

How does a strategy built around systematically buying-and-holding a basket of the market's biggest losers perform? It turns out pretty well, so why don't more investors do it?

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.