Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 526

In this new world, it’s time for these old world assets

Investing in unpopular stocks is a great way to make money for investors but a disciplined process is required to find uncomfortable opportunities. This is especially true in smaller companies, which have underperformed their large cap peers in 2022 and into 2023 against a backdrop of rising interest rates and a bleak economic outlook. We’ve seen this movie before. Small caps are more exposed to the economy, have less diversified businesses, and are less liquid than large caps. When the outlook starts to deteriorate, investors rush out of small caps and into large, liquid defensive stocks.

However, this underperformance has historically created an attractive entry point, as smaller companies deliver their strongest absolute and relative performance over larger companies when the economic outlook starts to improve. Small caps are now trading on a material discount to their historical relative valuations versus large caps.

The stockmarket is going through a phase when global investors are attracted to the ‘new world’ of large tech, growth companies. To find unpopular opportunities, a different framework for thinking is required. We hear a lot about new world assets, but in reality, it means higher expectations and greater potential to disappoint.

Uncomfortable opportunities in real assets

In fact, ‘old world’ assets are becoming more attractive because the barriers to building new things are getting higher. Anyone who has attempted an investment development such as residential or commercial property or a major project will know it is taking longer and it is much more expensive. There are more political constraints and fewer trades people. Interest rates are higher and competition among brands for a customer base is intense, and there’s less funding available for new businesses. Money was free a few years ago but now there’s a cost.

Newcrest Mining and Origin Energy are examples of good assets that have received attractive takeover bids in the past few months, Newcrest at a 30% premium and Origin at a 53% premium. Investors often focus on the ‘buy or build’ decision, and our view is that as the barriers go up to building new things, many existing assets become more valuable to buy rather than build.

Two old world companies the market is underestimating

Incitec Pivot (ASX:IPL) is not a household name but it's been unpopular in recent years, with the share price down from $4 to $3 in the last year. There are reasons for this, such as falling fertiliser prices, poor plant reliability and then the CEO stepped down. This is a company that turns gas into fertiliser or explosives, and when their plants don't work efficiently, they don’t make money. So it is a company that is out of favour and herein lies the opportunity. Its assets have value.

Its US fertiliser business is worth about $1.8 billion and Australian fertiliser business is about $1.4 billion, but the explosives business is what really matters. It’s valued at about $5.2 billion. The market probably understands that but underappreciates that this is radically-simplified business. In fact, they have sold the US business and there will be $1.8 billion cash on the balance sheet. They are looking at demerging or selling the Australian fertiliser business. We will be left with a pure play explosives business.

Consider the opportunity. One of the things miners must do is move material, and they need a lot of ammonium nitrate or explosives. In 2016, a huge ammonium nitrate plant was built in Western Australia. The green bars in the chart below show the market was over supplied with explosives for close to a decade. This is the type of original research we do.

How many explosives plants have been built in Australia since 2016? Zero. Miners such as BHP have been on a capex holiday and they are now increasing production, which means they are increasing movement of material. We see a large shortfall in the amount of explosives available in the Australian market. It can’t be covered by imports because explosives do not travel well, and the largest exporter of explosives was Russia with nearly half of global supply. We think this is a great time to be buying into the explosive business after 10 years of underperformance.

The second stock with some old-world characteristics is Domino’s Pizza (ASX:DMP). It was a major Covid winner in the lockdowns, but then it became a huge inflation loser. Inflation ravaged Domino's, it was among the most-impacted companies in the ASX200 from inflation. Food costs went up. Labour costs went up. Then they tried to push prices up but in a very clunky way. They added a Domino's Service Fee, the DSF they called it. It was a variable charge, like the surcharge on Uber during busy times. They had never had one before and customers started leaving. So Domino's was massively hit by inflation and issued seven profit downgrades in two years. It was a terrible time.

It’s out of favour but what is the opportunity? Domino’s makes money when they sell more pizza, and they sell more pizza by rolling out stores. And look at the following chart. They've gone from 500 stores in 2010 to 3,800 today. Even in the toughest time last year, they increased their stores by 6%. They have a very simple model with a delivery focus. It's small format so it's cheap to roll out new stores, in Australia today for about $500,000. They typically pay back in about four years, so for franchisees, this is a great investment.

We believe Domino's will revert to profit growth. They've committed to no more price increases based on what they can see, which will be more stable for customers. With store growth of about 7% per annum, and each store does a little better by about 3% per year. So it’s a business that can grow revenue at 10% a year and its earnings even higher. The inflation headwinds have created an opportunity and now they need to make the case for investing in the company.

That’s what we call an uncomfortable opportunity.

Finding comfort in the discomfort

The key takeaway is that many old world assets may be more attractive when the market is focusing more on the new world. Incitec Pivot, Domino’s, Newcrest and Origin are not large cap tech companies, and investors are overlooking them.

As Insitec Pivot becomes a simplified, pure play explosives business, and Domino's recovers from its inflation shocks, we believe both companies will move from discomfort to comfort.

 

Blake Henricks is Deputy Managing Director and Portfolio manager at Firetrail Investments. Firetrail is affiliated with Pinnacle Investment Management, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

For more articles and papers in Firstlinks from Pinnacle and its affiliates, click here.

 

  •   13 September 2023
  • 1
  •      
  •   

RELATED ARTICLES

Where Australia's largest ethical investor is finding opportunities

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.