Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 473

Six misconceptions and demystifying long/short funds

Long/short funds are a type of fund that aims to maximize the upside of markets, while limiting the downside risks. To do this, these funds take both long and short positions in investment positions, often from a specific market segment. Here we look at long / short funds in more detail, specifically how fund managers go about shorting what they perceive to be overvalued stocks.

Traditional long-only funds

Fund managers analyse an investable universe created according to certain investment criteria, for example, sound management, quality of business, conservative debt and recurring earnings. They then rank stocks on valuation metrics. With the discretion of the portfolio manager, these highest-ranking stocks are generally included in the portfolio. Importantly, nothing is done with the low-ranking or rejected stocks.

Shorting low-ranking stocks

Fund managers employ teams of analysts to evaluate risks and opportunities. This means assessing a great deal of both positive and negative factors impacting both sectors and individual companies. Most fund managers do nothing with the bad news, other than avoid certain stocks. But long/short funds provide investors a way to potentially profit from the bad news, as well as the good. This is done by actively utilising the low-ranking stocks by shorting them. Taking this view can benefit a long/short fund in the following ways:

  • It increases the opportunity set for the fund manager
  • If the stock declines in price, a profit is made when the short position is closed
  • Profit from short positions can be used to increase exposure to high conviction, long stocks
  • Gross exposure to markets increases, increasing the opportunities for the fund manager.

These opportunities are particularly valuable in volatile or sideways-trading markets.

The importance of risk management

Shorting is not without its risks. The Perpetual view is that shorting requires a specific skill set and a prudent risk management process to achieve a favourable balance in its funds that allow shorting. While the ability to short stocks is periodically criticised in the mainstream media, the main issue for investors is the nature of the risk involved. When an investor buys a share, the worst-case scenario is that he or she loses all the money they paid for it. However, when an investor shorts a share, the investor could lose more than their initial investment. There is no limit on the maximum loss because there is no upper limit on the share’s price. In other words, the loss will continue to increase as the security’s price rises. While well-chosen short positions can generate returns, especially during periods of market uncertainty, taking short positions does involve higher levels of risk than taking long positions only.

The benefits of a shorting strategy

  1. Source of return diversification
    Shorting allows investors to profit from declining share price. Not only can this boost portfolio return, but it can also provide diversification from the traditional ‘long only’ portfolio. If the investor’s assumptions are correct and the share falls in value, the short investor can actively generate a return.
  2. Increased opportunity
    Being able to short stocks increases a portfolio manager’s opportunity set. If a ‘long’ investor finds a share to be unattractive, their only option is to sell the share if they own it, or not buy the share.

How does it work?

Profiting from a falling share price takes a great deal of stock picking skill. This example demonstrates how it works in practice:

On those occasions where an investment manager finds a company that they believe will decrease in value, rather than increase, they can take a ‘short’ position in this company. This involves borrowing shares from a broker and selling them at the current price. The investment manager will be required to purchase the shares to return the borrowed stock to the broker in the future. If the share price decreases, the investment manager buys back the share at the lower price and returns it to the broker, keeping the difference as profit. If the share price increases, the investment manager buys back the share at the higher price incurring a loss.

Six shorting misconceptions debunked

While shorting strategies have the potential to generate returns in both up and down markets, there are several myths about shorting that may leave some investors reticent to pursue this investment strategy in their portfolio. And some who are overly enthusiastic!

"Shorting can make a company go bankrupt"

Shorting a share is no more sinister than selling a share for less than you paid for it. Assuming a company has a reasonably strong balance sheet, even if its share price fell to zero, it would still be worth the value of its balance sheet.

"Shorting was a major reason for the GFC”

Prior to the GFC, there were a lot of companies with over-stretched balance sheets that were exposed during this period. Shorting did not create the downward pressure on these shares during the GFC. However, during the extraordinary circumstances of the GFC, it can certainly be argued that it compounded the pressures already at play.

"Shorting is the secret sauce for positive returns"

While shorting provides the opportunity to profit in both rising and falling markets, not all short positions generate a positive return. In fact, shorting is a specialist skill, as picking companies that will decline in price can often be much harder than picking companies that will rise in price.

"Shorting is not transparent"

Since June 2010, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has required all stockbrokers to report their total short sale positions daily. This information is released four business days after the trade on ASIC’s website.

"Shorting is not ethical"

In 2021, Elon Musk described shorting as “a scam legal only for vestigial reasons", echoing a view that shorting a company is tantamount to wanting it to fail. This is not the case. In fact, shorting can be a benefit to the overall market because it adds liquidity, improves trading efficiency and helps to highlight where poor company management is not delivering on its promise to shareholders.

"Shorting doesn’t work"

The positive long-term performance of market indices may lead some to believe that shorting does not work. However, the aim of short selling is to profit from shorter-term factors, such as negative news or earnings downgrades, and can be used as a complement to a long portfolio that benefits from share price gains over the longer term.

 

Sean Roger is Deputy Portfolio Manager for the Perpetual SHARE-PLUS Long-Short Fund at Perpetual Investment Management, a sponsor of Firstlinks. This article contains general information only and is not intended to provide you with financial advice or take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs.

For more articles and papers from Perpetual, please click here.

 

5 Comments
Graeme
September 04, 2022

I would question that "Shorting doesn't work" when applied to equities is a myth. A pure long short fund (ie. market neutral) with an 'average' fund manager should theoretically generate a zero return in both rising and falling markets. However an entirely unscientific review of the performance of the first four market neutral funds I could find over the three months to 31/7/22 (a clearly negative period for markets) showed all had negative performance, ranging from -10 to -3%. Interestingly, all had positive performance over longer periods of positive market movement. One can only conclude from this that shorting simply doesn't work.

Kevin
September 03, 2022

On a further point Jerome the year is not up yet.One year means nothing at all .I'm not expecting to be crucified by the end of this year,but it can happen.
MQG share purchase plan $191 a share.I bought a few more to average down I'm under water.December last year.
CSL share purchase plan $253 a share .I bought more at $242.To date I'm claiming I picked bottom,but I don't pay attention to prices usually.

CBA bought in Feb $93 ish,3 dividends in 13 months expected .

Graham and his $&3)# ING podcast, APA at $8.70 or whatever it was.Graham and his mate picked bottom ish for me.

I'll watch the paint dry for 10 years of short term investing.

In the context that you have given,yes,one year is a long time in options.I'm giving the other side of the coin.Nothing at at all should be based on one year,unless you're partly cashing out and going for some sleep at night money.

Kevin
September 03, 2022

Are you adjusting to the old reality Jerome.I like watching paint dry.Anywhere between a 50 and 100 fold return over the decades is exciting enough for me,and it is free.The registry and the money do the work for me.

In general for some fun,yes.Taking my eyes off the paint and doing something else is a huge increase in my work load though. Each to their own.

Thanks for the article Sean,it confirmed most of what I thought I knew.More articles digging a bit deeper would be good.

Jerome Lander
September 03, 2022

If you're not using or considering long short strategies and other alternatives in some way today, then you're probably not adjusting to the new reality. Long only investing in both stocks and bonds has been crucified this year as the easy money party ended, and remains highly vulnerable to further disappointment. Long only investing is a much lazier (and hence cheaper even if poorer value) way to invest so unfortunately suits many despite its poorer risk adjusted return prospects at the current time. Of course that doesn't mean it has to suit you.

Denial
September 07, 2022

"Long only investing is a much lazier" LOL Jerome Lander. Worst performing funds over most periods greater than 3 years have been the long short funds with just a few minor exceptions and most don't exceed the net returns generated by VanEck index funds. Seems like a lot of smoke and mirror based on the empirical evidence. 

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Australian house prices close in on world record

Sydney is set to become the world’s most expensive city for housing over the next 12 months, a new report shows. Our other major cities aren’t far behind unless there are major changes to improve housing affordability.

The case for the $3 million super tax

The Government's proposed tax has copped a lot of flack though I think it's a reasonable approach to improve the long-term sustainability of superannuation and the retirement income system. Here’s why.

Tariffs are a smokescreen to Trump's real endgame

Behind market volatility and tariff threats lies a deeper strategy. Trump’s real goal isn’t trade reform but managing America's massive debts, preserving bond market confidence, and preparing for potential QE.

The super tax and the defined benefits scandal

Australia's superannuation inequities date back to poor decisions made by Parliament two decades ago. If super for the wealthy needs resetting, so too does the defined benefits schemes for our public servants.

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Getting rich vs staying rich

Strategies to get rich versus stay rich are markedly different. Here is a look at the five main ways to get rich, including through work, business, investing and luck, as well as those that preserve wealth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: Withdrawing assets ahead of the $3m super tax

The super tax has caused an almighty scuffle, but for SMSFs impacted by the proposed tax, a big question remains: what should they do now? Here are ideas for those wanting to withdraw money from their SMSF.

Superannuation

The huge cost of super tax concessions

The current net annual cost of superannuation tax subsidies is around $40 billion, growing to more than $110 billion by 2060. These subsidies have always been bad policy, representing a waste of taxpayers' money.

Planning

How to avoid inheritance fights

Inspired by the papal conclave, this explores how families can avoid post-death drama through honest conversations, better planning, and trial runs - so there are no surprises when it really matters.

Superannuation

Super contribution splitting

Super contribution splitting allows couples to divide before-tax contributions to super between spouses, maximizing savings. It’s not for everyone, but in the right circumstances, it can be a smart strategy worth exploring.

Economy

Trump vs Powell: Who will blink first?

The US economy faces an unprecedented clash in leadership styles, but the President and Fed Chair could both take a lesson from the other. Not least because the fiscal and monetary authorities need to work together.

Gold

Credit cuts, rising risks, and the case for gold

Shares trade at steep valuations despite higher risks of a recession. Amid doubts that a 60/40 portfolio can still provide enough protection through times of market stress, gold's record shines bright.

Investment strategies

Buffett acolyte warns passive investors of mediocre future returns

While Chris Bloomstan doesn't have the track record of his hero, it's impressive nonetheless. And he's recently warned that today has uncanny resemblances to the 1990s tech bubble and US returns are likely to be disappointing.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.