Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 664

SMSF estate planning: Eight things to consider

Increasingly, super is the next major asset after the family home (sometimes it is the client’s most significant asset, as demonstrated in McIntosh v Mcintosh [2014] QSC 99. It is therefore imperative that any estate planning for your client must also involve planning for their SMSF.

Here are eight things that SMSF trustees could consider:

1. Consider what ‘Armageddon’ is for every SMSF

What is each fund’s 'Armageddon', or worst-case scenario?

This will be subjective for each SMSF.

For example, in a 'husband and wife' fund where the wife always left the running of the fund to her husband, what if the husband suddenly died or lost mental capacity? Could the wife continue with the fund, or would it all be too hard for her?

2. Check the trust deed and (for a corporate trustee) the trustee constitution

It is essential for the constituent documents of the fund to authorise any ‘Armageddon’ strategies to be implemented.

For instance, making a binding death benefit nomination (BDBN) can achieve certainty regarding payment of a super death benefit, and can prevent disputes. However, does the fund trust deed authorise a BDBN to be made? If so, would the BDBN lapse after three years or can it be non-lapsing?

What about the trustee constitution? In a two-member fund with a corporate trustee, if one member dies the survivor can usually carry on as the sole director/shareholder. However, the trustee constitution must authorise this.

3. Amend trust deed and/or constitution if unsatisfactory

If the fund trust deed and/or trustee constitution do not authorise the relevant ‘Armageddon’ strategies, they will require amendment.

Consider also whether the trust deed should be completely updated (a common strategy) or should the amendment be more bespoke (especially where necessary to “grandfather” previous provisions).

4. Discuss ‘Armageddon’ with your clients

If the worst case scenario happened, what are the options? For instance:

  • Could the surviving member continue to operate the fund, perhaps as a sole director of a corporate trustee?
  • Or would it be better to simply wind up the fund and rollover to an APRA-regulated or small APRA fund?

5. Consider using the same trust deed for all SMSFs

If you have clients who came to you with an existing SMSF trust deed, these conversations may be quite different for each of them depending on what their trust deed says.

It may make sense (and ultimately save your clients angst and expense) to have the trust deeds for all clients fully updated to a modern trust deed, well before their ‘Armageddon’ arrives.

6. Ensure all members have valid EPOAs

If all fund members have an up-to-date enduring power of attorney (EPOA), it makes things much easier in the event that:

• A member loses capacity - their attorney can become the trustee or director of the trustee in their place under s.17A of the SIS Act;

• A member departs overseas indefinitely - their attorney can become the trustee or director of the trustee in their place to avoid fund residency issues.

However, you need to ensure (on an ongoing basis) that the person nominated as attorney is not a disqualified person (e.g. someone convicted of an offence involving dishonesty), otherwise they will not be able to act as trustee or director of the trustee in place of the member.

7. Ensure BDBNs are up to date and non-lapsing

The last thing your clients need is for a situation like Katz v Grossman or McIntosh v McIntosh to happen to them.

SMSFD 2008/3 confirms that, with a correctly structured trust deed, a well-written BDBN can provide both certainty and an appropriate and tax-effective succession of your clients’ superannuation death benefits.

Whilst being non-lapsing means not having to remember to renew a BDBN, another issue is that some SMSFs don’t authorise a BDBN to be made by a member’s enduring attorney, so if it lapses and the member has since lost capacity the BDBN cannot be renewed.

8. Change from individual trustees to corporate trustee

For many reasons it is prudent to change from having individual trustees to a single corporate trustee, such as:

  • Ease of administration on the death, bankruptcy or incapacity of a member;
  • Ease of administration if a member departs overseas; and
  • Minimise the risk of incurring multiple 'speeding ticket' fines from the ATO.

 

Michael Hallinan is Special Counsel – Superannuation, for SUPERCentral, an independent online platform provider of SMSFs, advice, legal documentation and wealth management services to accounting and financial planning firms throughout Australia.

Please note that these comments are for your consideration only and are provided to assist you in deciding whether to proceed to obtain a formal opinion on the issue. These comments cannot be relied upon by either you or any of your clients until and unless we issue that formal opinion.

 

  •   27 May 2026
  • 5
  •      
  •   
5 Comments
lyn
June 01, 2026

Oldbutsane, In your position re first sentence. Your last sentence is critical.
Also now in position as P of A for remaining member of fund under corporate trustee and it's a hot mess. Found wheels of law & finance move slowly for latter, plus cost of professional advice to P's of A in order to know how to act in best interest of the member left, under no circumstance from this new experience could I ever think made a mistake in my choice of individual trustees. Understand there are reasons for a different choice but to me, costs of 'end matters' seem massive and more complicated.

npickins
May 28, 2026

Please explain what "Minimise the risk of incurring multiple 'speeding ticket' fines from the ATO." means as it is jargon.

Philip
May 29, 2026

Is your first name "Nit" by any chance? ; )
Agreed, however that writers need to be explicit rather than wander into jargon, or worse (as in this case) meaningless jargon...

1
graham
June 03, 2026

Graham
Real world considerations are
Having a signed Substitute Director Nomination for the Corporate Trustee.

Also, many Banks have changed business practices in a post Hayne world - An EPOA will likely gave access to Bank balances, but little else, i.e. no ability to transact - practice varies by Bank, and in some cases by branch.
If the dominant operator - Director / Member is incapacitated, and the other Director / Member is unfamiliar with Bank operations, then the substitute Attorney, or Alternative Director will need a signed Authority to Operate the SMSF bank account.
Logging in using another's credentials is a complete no no. Such cases have resulted in calls from banks Fraud Departments, accounts can be frozen, and complicated time consuming remedying of such situations ensues.

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

SMSFs and the control over estate planning

Limits to a will’s power over an SMSF

Importance of updating your SMSF Trust Deed

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Noel Whittaker’s take on the budget

Marketed as a fix for inequality and housing affordability, the latest budget instead delivers a tangle of tax changes that leave everyday Australians worse off.

Australia has no death duties. Technically.

Australia may not levy formal death duties, but a growing web of tax measures is quietly shaping what wealth passes between generations. Now, the 2026 budget adds another layer.

Lithium's rally is real this time – but no-one trusts it

The lithium rally mirrors the early-2010s tech stock surge, with demand set to double by 2030. Supply has been slow to respond, creating a market deficit for future tech like humanoid robotics and solid-state batteries.

Welcome to Firstlinks Edition 662 with weekend update

The debate over the budget is increasingly shaped by frustration and perceptions of unfairness, rather than clear-eyed assessment of policy outcomes.

How inflation is quietly moving the goalposts on retirement

Inflation doesn’t just raise today’s bills - it quietly increases the amount needed to retire, while simultaneously making it harder to save. Three steps to take before June 30th to improve retirement outcomes.

How to minimise tax with a will

Inheritance tax implications in Australia may surprise some, as poor estate planning without proper wills or trusts can lead to costly tax bills and delays for beneficiaries.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: The CGT changes don’t impact super but what about Div 296 tax decisions?

New CGT rules could tip the scales in the super vs non-super debate. For those facing the Division 296 tax, the case for withdrawing has gotten more complex. A "comparison rate" tool may help assess decisions.

Planning

Testamentary trusts post-budget: Estate planning, tax reform and the ‘death tax’ debate

Proposed Budget changes to taxation are casting new uncertainty over testamentary trusts, prompting closer scrutiny of estate planning structures and the real implications of reforms still taking shape.

Taxation

Income tax and bracket creep

Examining how five "tax cuts" stack up against bracket creep. Why offsets and incremental changes may do little to ease rising average tax burdens, compared to structural reform through indexation over time.  

Exchange traded products

The limits of a quality investing approach in Australia

Quality strategies shine globally, but Australia's concentrated market tells a different story. Limited diversification and sector dominance can constrain the defensive outcomes investors have seen in broader markets.

Investment strategies

Balancing opportunity and complexity

As private markets expand, investors face a growing mix of structures, a stabilising private equity cycle and uneven AI disruption. Fresh questions are being raised about where the real opportunities now sit.

Investment strategies

Why strong returns matter as much as generosity

As EOFY approaches, structured giving offers a tax-effective way to support charities, while allowing donations to grow over time and play a longer-term role in family wealth and legacy planning outcomes.

Investment strategies

The most important investment decision you’ll ever make

Stock picking often gets the spotlight, but research shows asset allocation explains the vast majority of long‑term returns. Understanding your mix of growth and defensive assets is the real key to investment success.

Sponsors

Alliances

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.