Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 425

Seven factors driving growth in Managed Accounts

It's hardly 'late breaking news' to say there’s a lot of change going on in financial advice. Much of it is driven by regulation but the deeper impacts are due to structural change impacting many other sectors of financial services.

Managed Accounts are an important and growing part of the advice profession and IMAP’s survey of the managed account market shows a total Funds Under Management (FUM) as at 30 June 2021 of $111 billion, exceeding $100 billion for the first time.

Managed Accounts servicing more advisers

Managed Accounts are delivered through two main structures – Separately Managed Accounts or SMAs, essentially a single platform managed investment scheme, and Managed Discretionary Accounts or MDAs, an agreement-based service. The former is generally a product-based approach to the delivery of advice, the latter a service-based approach.

Either type of Managed Account is created by or on behalf of the advice profession as a way of delivering more or less customised portfolios in an efficient way. How customised is a function of the technology in use and the client circumstances.


Source: IMAP

IMAP has been collecting data on managed accounts of all types since 2017 and at $111 billion they are almost exactly the same size as the ETF market. This CAGR of 21% over the past three years, if maintained, will see Managed Accounts exceed $200 billion in 2024. Simple trend extrapolation is often a trap, but in an advised market that comfortably exceeds $1 trillion in assets, this seems credible.

We identify seven factors as driving this growth:

1. Professionalisation

Regulation, higher educational standards, the generational change of traditional advisers being replaced by younger, better educated women and men, many more independent investment consultants ... all these have led to the professionalisation of advice and portfolios built to meet client objectives with a higher probability of success.

Advice firms are adding resources to manage or ‘commission’ portfolios delivered through Managed Accounts which reflect particular approaches to investment markets. The investment consultants and research houses have been happy to meet this need and have brought far more rigour to the creation and management of portfolios than the old Approved Product List-based approach. This has allowed advisers to focus on the areas of expertise where they can personally add value for clients.

But professionalism isn’t simply about education standards and compliance. It’s also about operating advice businesses in an efficient manner with appropriate standards of governance, effective operating structure, sustainable revenue and cost models. Managed Accounts enable advisers to meet a continuing level of demand for advice at a time when the number of advisers is declining.

2. Wider investment choice

One of the key features of the investment landscape has been the expansion of investment options such as retail access to international shares, alternative funds or ETFs and other ETPs on the ASX and Chi-X.

The growth in the number and value of ETFs/ETPs, with the transactional advantages, transparency, superior reporting and often lower cost these products are able to offer compared to unlisted managed funds has seen them rapidly adopted into Managed Accounts.

IMAP estimates that Managed Accounts constitute 14% of FUM invested in ETFs in June 2021.

3. Technology

As in so many other areas, technology has transformed the capability of providers to easily create highly customised services. The platforms have been in a technology race to enable licensee-based portfolio management and lower cost technology is enabling the management of directly held assets in a way which simply wasn’t contemplated previously. Apart from the portfolio management capabilities, we’re seeing offshore listed assets directly held by retail clients and traded economically.

As an example of the impact of technology, Nucleus Wealth, the 2021 IMAP Innovation Award winner, offers highly-nuanced individualisation of ESG preferences through Managed Accounts in a way not available in pooled vehicles.

Cloud-based services and blockchain will only accelerate this drive.

4. Regulation

Traditional advice through Statement of Advice (SoAs) and Records of Advice (RoAs) is a cottage industry, inadequately systematised, delivered on a one-by-one basis to clients. It’s a recipe for compliance nightmares and breaches. The recent Westpac advice business corporate action remediation is costing around $100 million and grew out of apparently mishandling less than one corporate action on average per client per year for 14 years.

Managed Accounts enable a licensee to introduce a systematic approach to the management of portfolios, and ensure the clear allocation of responsibilities between advisers, platforms, providers and portfolio managers.

Best interest obligations are a frequently discussed topic in regard to Managed Accounts. Does ‘best interest’ have to mean cheaper? Actually, the correct question is “When is a process that is more structured than traditional advice, has clear objectives, is systematically managed, is more equitable, reduces implementation leakage and enables better reporting not in a client’s best interest?” This message is starting to become apparent to clearer-thinking advice firms.

5. Competitive pressure

Platforms, investment managers, research houses and advice licensees have all felt the pressure in the past few years from their respective client bases to create and support Managed Account offerings. It’s a dynamic market at work and the pressure to innovate isn’t likely to let up in the near future. It’s part of a virtuous circle of innovation where demand calls forth supply and supply creates demand.

6. ‘Retailisation’ of institutional capability

Driven by the factors we’ve set out above, the lines are blurring between retail, wholesale and institutional clients and capabilities. Examples include:

  • A Managed Account presents the chance for a portfolio manager to offer investment managers mandates of tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars
  • Use of assets listed on offshore exchanges and pooled structures such as UCITS in retail portfolios
  • Consultants offer sophisticated capabilities such as dynamic risk management designed specifically to manage sequencing risk for retail clients
  • Management of currency hedging for individual retail clients
  • Institutional asset consultants are also active.

Capabilities which previously were available only to institutional investors or though pooled vehicles such as unit trusts are now increasingly deployed for individual accounts.

7. Price compression

All of these factors are leading to lower costs for retail clients. Advice licensees see a value add for their clients in their ability to use lower cost investment options such as ETFs and direct holdings and in putting pressure on the costs of other participants in the value chain through rebates and specific unit classes.

The price pressures on platforms have occurred for broader reasons, but Managed Accounts have contributed. As advisers feel their own margins are under pressure, expect this focus on driving down costs to continue. And as the costs associated with Managed Accounts fall relative to more expensive service delivery of individual advice through RoAs, expect this economic reality to compound.

The factors we have listed above aren’t temporary and are likely to intensify. Their prediction of a $200 billion market before 2025 doesn’t seem far-fetched.

 

Toby Potter is Chair of IMAP (Institute of Managed Account Professionals) and a Director of Philo Capital Advisers, an MDA Provider. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of any investor.

 

  •   15 September 2021
  • 5
  •      
  •   
5 Comments
Jack
September 16, 2021

Thanks for the article but I'm struggling a little to get to the exact advantage of these managed accounts versus the old fashioned platforms. At its core, is it that in the old way, funds are pooled and the actions of one investor affects others, whereas the new way treats each investor individually?

Toby Potter
September 16, 2021

Hi Jack,
While some managed accounts are effectively also platforms (Praemium, Mason Stevens, Xplore Wealth) many are run on traditional platforms (Philo Capital). The platforms are essentially administrative vehicles.
The key point about managed accounts is the discretion to make investment decisions on behalf of each investor based on the mandate / investment program.
Your comment about each investor being treated individually is correct, compared to pooled unit trusts.

Phil
September 16, 2021

Well the cynic in me would say that most of the advantage here goes to the financial advice community - a way for them to charge a % and to gain efficiency/scale in delivering what was otherwise being delivered by institutions. And they are being enabled by disruptors in the funds/platform space. The espoused tailored mandates are highly arguable, with most I've seen looking very similar at asset allocation and even underlying manager levels, and at worst intensify active management risk by managing direct equities with arguably less experienced investment teams than more traditional fund managers. One aspect also espoused is greater tax efficiency, but I haven't seen any academic or independent research to support that thesis either, perhaps because they haven't been around long enough. I'm still also interested in how Standard 3 will apply, because if it does in the literal sense, many of these SMA's will have to be wound down.

Tried and tested
September 18, 2021

Absolutely spot on...I can't see any benefit to the client in using a SMA, MDA . I did some rough,back of envelope, numbers and couldn't find any difference. No client of mine has ever asked for these ...I think it fails the ' pub test', fasea 3, and best interest duty... Also feel more exposed if the proverbial hits the fan .. sticking with funds

Toby Potter
September 18, 2021

Many managed accounts are comprised of managed funds - in fact the IMAP census shows that managed funds and ETFs are over 50% of the assets held in $111bn of managed accounts. Typically when funds are in a managed account the portfolio manager negotiates a reduction in the fund ICR which is passed on to the clients, the major benefit for the clients is that what they think their adviser is doing " managing their portfolio" actually happens. How many advisers work through their entire client base because they want to increase exposure to an asset class by 5% or reduce exposure to a manger by 25% or increase a holding in a stock but only if the price is less than a certain price. A twice a year meeting and good luck betweentimes isn't gong to be a sustainable advice model.
Most advisers who adopt a managed account of whatever type find their clients say "I thought this was what you were doing anyway"

 

Leave a Comment:

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Are you making these SMSF mistakes?

After four decades advising investors, there are a few common mistakes I've seen SMSF investors make. From holding too much cash and chasing yield to overtrading and trusting tips. Are these errors costing you?

Why have Australian living standards 'fallen' and how do we fix it?

For the last few years there has been much talk of a 'cost-of-living' crisis in Australia and of 'falling living standards'. Lately this has flared up again with the pickup in inflation resulting in a renewed fall in real wages.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

Four options for an income investor’s next dollar

What if Australia’s golden age of dividends is ending? Rather than overhaul your portfolio, it may be worth considering where new capital can work harder. I discuss four income strategies and the trade-offs behind each.

Retirement spending is not one-size-fits-all

New data challenges the idea that Australians are underspending their super. The bigger issue may be helping retirees navigate complexity, make confident decisions and use their savings to support security, wellbeing and choice.

The missing link in the CGT debate

A little-noticed consequence of Labor’s tax changes could have implications well beyond investors’ tax bills. The issue raises bigger questions about incentives, capital allocation and the drivers of long-term economic growth.

Latest Updates

SMSF strategies

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

The ageing ‘crisis’ has not and will not happen

Rising age dependency is frequently treated as a warning sign for economies. But when actual workforce participation is examined, a strikingly different picture emerges about ageing, productivity and economic sustainability.

Retirement

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Shares

Four charts that expose market concentration risk

Investors have recently been rewarded for backing market leaders, but history suggests this eventually comes at a cost. Now may be the time to review whether your portfolio is carrying unintended risks beneath the surface.

Investment strategies

The case for gearing beyond property

Most Australians gear into property but ignore shares. That may be a mistake. Used carefully, geared equity strategies can enhance long-term returns, reduce cash tied up in growth assets and support retirement income goals.

Economy

Australia's $1 trillion debt pile

The headlines exclaiming that Australian government debt has hit A$1 trillion and US government debt has hit $40 trillion has turned heads, but how serious are they really? Will Australia's mix of debt create challenges?

Economy

Has 100 years of growth made us any happier?

For decades, GDP has been the benchmark for economic success, but has it made us materially happier? If happiness does not rise in lockstep with prosperity, are we overlooking what constitutes a successful society?

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.