Register For Our Mailing List

Register to receive our free weekly newsletter including editorials.

Home / 614

Super contribution splitting

Couples looking to maximise their joint savings may benefit from super contribution splitting depending on their circumstances and goals.

Super contribution splitting can be a suitable strategy when one member of a couple has a higher super balance than the other and/or is earning a higher salary and receiving a greater amount of employer super guarantee contributions.

There are different reasons why you might use it, your financial adviser will be best placed to advise you.

How does contribution splitting work?

Contribution splitting allows you to split your before-tax (concessional) contributions to super with your spouse, which includes married, de facto and registered relationships. These comprise, but are not limited to, employer super guarantee contributions, contributions made under a salary sacrifice arrangement and personal contributions by an eligible person which may be claimed as a tax deduction.

Not all contributions qualify, the following contributions can’t be split:

  • after-tax (non-concessional) contributions
  • rollovers
  • super lump sums paid from a foreign super fund
  • contributions to a defined benefit account.

The age of the member splitting the contribution is irrelevant, but your spouse must be under age 65. If they have reached preservation age at the time of the split, your spouse must declare they do not meet the retirement condition of release. Once received by the super fund, the contributions are preserved until your spouse meets a condition of release.

The maximum amount of contributions that can be split annually is the lesser of:

  • 85% of before-tax contributions, and
  • the before-tax (concessional) contributions cap, including any unused concessional contribution cap from the last five years (if eligible).

Contribution splitting doesn’t reduce the amount of concessional contributions which count towards your concessional contributions cap in a financial year and won’t get rid of an excess contribution. Importantly, while the contributions are transferred to your spouse’s super, they still count towards your cap.

Always check with your fund, not all super funds offer contribution splitting and some funds charge a fee.

What are the benefits of splitting?

Couples may use super contribution splitting for different reasons.

  1. You can use it as a strategy to keep your spouse’s super below $500,000. This could allow them to take advantage of their unused concessional contribution cap from the past five years to make a higher pre-tax contribution.
  2. You can use spouse contribution splitting to even out account balances (as far as practicable). With the transfer balance cap placing a limit on the amount of super you can move into a tax-free retirement income stream, splitting contributions from a spouse with a higher balance, particularly if it is done over several years, can assist with both parties maximising their transfer balance cap. This could also be beneficial if the proposed Division 296 tax (additional 15% tax on super balances over $3 million) or a similar concept is legislated, placing an additional tax on high balance super accounts.

Example

Stanley, age 54, has $1.3 million in super. He earns $250,000 pa, plus super guarantee. His spouse Evie, age 54, has $500,000 in super, and earns $70,000 pa, plus super guarantee.

Over the course of the next 10 years, Stanley splits the maximum concessional contribution to Evie. At age 64, assuming no other contributions, and a net earning rate of 5.28%, their super balances are projected to be $2,000,000 for Stanley and $1,235,000 for Evie. This allows them to retire and each transfer their respective super balances into tax-free pensions (based on current legislation).

  1. When one member of the couple is older, the younger spouse could split their super contributions to the older spouse, who may be able to access their benefit at an earlier date.
  2. There may also be advantages in splitting contributions with a spouse who is younger. For example, it may temporarily reduce the value of your combined assets under the social security means test and could result in greater Centrelink or DVA pension entitlements.
  3. For a lower income or non-working spouse, contribution splitting can help ensure they have sufficient funds to pay premiums for Life and Total and Permanent Disability Insurance cover they hold in their super fund.

How do you elect to split and when does it apply?

The superannuation contribution splitting process is retrospective and usually you can only elect to split contributions made during a financial year once that same financial year has ended and within the next 12 months. However, if your entire benefit is to be rolled over, transferred or cashed out, you can request that your contributions be split during the financial year in which they are made.

Importantly, if you intend on claiming a tax deduction for any personal deductible contributions that you want to split, you must lodge the notice of your intention to claim a tax deduction before requesting that the contributions be split.

Example

Lachie is 67 and retired in March 2025. In addition to his employer super guarantee contributions of $15,000, he made a non-concessional contribution of $15,000 in December 2024, on which he intends to claim a deduction. He would like to split the maximum contributions he can to his wife Bree, age 60, and roll his super into an account-based pension to generate a tax-free retirement income stream as soon as possible.

The timing of Lachie’s strategies is important as follows:

  1. Lodge a 'Notice of intent to claim or vary a deduction for personal super contributions' on the $15,000 personal contribution, and receive acknowledgement from the super fund.
  2. Next, complete a 'Superannuation contributions splitting application' to request the maximum contributions of $25,500 ($30,000 x 85%) made in the 2024-25 financial year be split to Bree. This can be done in the same financial year, as his entre balance is to be rolled over. Bree works part-time and is able to declare she is not permanently retired.
  3. Having completed both these steps, Lachie can now rollover his super to a retirement income stream.

If Lachie applies for the Age Pension, the contributions split to Bree will not be assessable under the assets or income test whilst maintained in her accumulation account and may increase his potential benefit.

Get the right advice

Contribution splitting can be valuable under the right circumstances, it’s not a ‘one size fits all’ strategy and its appropriateness will depend on the couple’s personal circumstances and goals. Knowing the rules and benefits can help you decide whether its right for you. What works for one couple may not work for another, and as everyone’s circumstances are different talk to a financial adviser about your options.

 

Brooke Logan is a technical and strategy lead in UniSuper's advice team. UniSuper is a sponsor of Firstlinks. Please note that past performance isn’t an indicator of future performance. The information in this article is of a general nature and may include general advice. It doesn’t take into account your personal financial situation, needs or objectives. Before making any investment decision, you should consider your circumstances, the PDS and TMD relevant to you, and whether to consult a qualified financial adviser.

For more articles and papers from UniSuper, click here.

 

  •   4 June 2025
  • 6
  •      
  •   
6 Comments
Jack
June 09, 2025

I have a younger spouse and am thinking that using this strategy for age pension purposes. That is, super assets don't count in the assets test for the age pension. So I assume if I split contributions with my spouse, we might be better off when I turn 67?

Brooke
June 10, 2025

Hi Jack. Super held in accumulation phase is not assessable for Age Pension whilst under Age Pension age. Therefore, any super you have split to your spouse will not be assessed by Centrelink whilst they are under age 67 and it is in accumulation, even once you reach age 67. It could potentially increase your Age Pension, depending on your other assets and income.

Theo R
June 10, 2025

I'm 55 and my wife is 50 - is there an optimal time to do this, or just asap? And if you split once, can you split again later?

Neil R
June 10, 2025

I wonder how any contribution split would be treated in a subsequent divorce...

Katrina
July 07, 2026

In a divorce you normally have to split super the combined value of super, using whatever metric is negotiated or ordered by the court. There normally isn't a carve out for super unless it is negotiated by the divorcing parties.

Jim
June 10, 2025

Thank you for the article.

My wife and I are both retired. Could you clarify whether in Pension phase (I'm 64), I can make contributions to her accumulation phase fund from any concessional contributions I make myself into my accumulation fund?

 

Leave a Comment:

RELATED ARTICLES

A super new opportunity for EOFY 2018

New super doors opening from 1 July 2017

Meg on SMSFs: Is contribution splitting a forgotten strategy?

banner

Most viewed in recent weeks

Why spending more in early retirement can improve lifetime income

Conventional wisdom encourages retirees to preserve superannuation. But if those likely to qualify for the Age Pension later in life spend a little more today, it may deliver higher lifetime income and a more stable retirement.

Will you run out of money in retirement?

Fear of running out has become a defining retirement anxiety. Why do some retirees die with substantial wealth while others deplete their nest egg? Evidence suggests the answer is more complicated than we think. 

The investment that sidesteps the new tax traps

Tax rules have changed, but many investors are still using yesterday’s strategies. Insurance bonds may offer advantages for those seeking greater control, tax efficiency and certainty about their wealth.

Testamentary trusts have secured the CGT exemption

Treasury’s latest CGT reform draft delivers a win for testamentary trusts and deceased estates, exempting estate-derived gains from the 30% floor. However, questions on death and divorce rollovers remain unresolved.

Meg on SMSFs: What do we think about reversionary pensions these days?

Reversionary pensions have long been a staple of SMSF estate planning, but are they still the best option? Meg Heffron revisits a once-clear favourite and asks whether changing super rules have shifted the balance.

How does the 4% rule stack up?

The 4% rule has long been retirement's gold standard. But after a difficult period for investors, fresh analysis suggests a more conservative approach may significantly improve the chances of making savings last.

Latest Updates

Planning

Testamentary trusts survived the trust tax. The drafting battle has just begun.

The fight over testamentary trusts looked settled. Then the draft legislation arrived. Hidden in a technical detail is a question that could force many families to rethink wills they thought were already future-proof.

Investment strategies

The new capital gains tax trap for your portfolio

Investors have long accepted one portfolio rule without much question. A major tax shift could change that calculation entirely, forcing difficult trade-offs between risk, discipline and an overlooked cost lurking beneath.

Economy

Population growth masks Australia’s productivity problem

For years, investors have benefited from a seemingly reliable growth story. But recent national accounts raise uncomfortable questions about what has really been driving Australia’s economy and whether that can continue unchecked.

Investment strategies

Why tomorrow’s winners may not be today’s index leaders

The stocks that built retirement balances over the past decade now dominate many portfolios. The new challenge is whether these companies can continue meeting the increasingly high expectations embedded in today's share prices.

Investing

What earnings surprises reveal about future returns

Sometimes the most important information in an earnings result isn't the number itself. It's the possibility that the market's assumptions have been fundamentally wrong and future earnings may look very different.

SMSF strategies

Individual SMSF Trusteeship directly liable for ATO fines

A rarely discussed detail buried in SMSF structures could dramatically change who wears the cost when something goes wrong. With penalties rising, a decision many dismissed as administrative may deserve a second look.

Investment strategies

The currency bet you didn’t know you made

Buying global shares means making two bets: on the companies and on the Australian dollar. Most investors consciously choose only the first. Last financial year, the second bet cost 8.5% in returns for many investors.

Sponsors

Alliances

  • ASA-Logo-RGB-ActiveGreen-web.png

© 2026 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Disclaimer
The data, research and opinions provided here are for information purposes; are not an offer to buy or sell a security; and are not warranted to be correct, complete or accurate. Morningstar, its affiliates, and third-party content providers are not responsible for any investment decisions, damages or losses resulting from, or related to, the data and analyses or their use. To the extent any content is general advice, it has been prepared for clients of Morningstar Australasia Pty Ltd (ABN: 95 090 665 544, AFSL: 240892), without reference to your financial objectives, situation or needs. For more information refer to our Financial Services Guide. You should consider the advice in light of these matters and if applicable, the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making any decision to invest. Past performance does not necessarily indicate a financial product’s future performance. To obtain advice tailored to your situation, contact a professional financial adviser. Articles are current as at date of publication.
This website contains information and opinions provided by third parties. Inclusion of this information does not necessarily represent Morningstar’s positions, strategies or opinions and should not be considered an endorsement by Morningstar.